Field ethics: Towards situated ethics for ethnographic research on the Internet;Ética de campo: Hacia una ética situada para la investigación etnográfica de internet

Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung

Volumn 8, Issue 3, 2007, Pages

  Estalella, Adolfo ^a   Ardèvol, Elisenda ^a  

^a UNIVERSITAT OBERTA DE CATALUNYA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 36048986388     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14385627     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Allen, Christina (1996). What's wrong with the "Golden Rule"? Conundrums of conducting ethical research in cyberspace. Information Society, 12, 175-187.
2. American Anthropological Association (1998). Code of ethics of the American Anthropological Association, http://www.aaanet.org/committees/ ethigs/ethcode.htm [30/11/2006].
3. Amit, Vered (2000). Constructing the field. Ethnographic fieldwork in the contemporary world. Londres: Routledge.
4. Ardèvol, Elisenda (2005). Catálogo de sueños: Las relaciones personales en Internet como producto de consumo. En W.AA. (Eds.), X Congreso de Antropología de la Federación de Asociaciones de Antropología del Estado Español (pp.37-58). Sevilla: Federación de Asociaciones de Antropología del Estado Español.
5. Ardèvol, Elisenda; Bertran, Marta; Callen, Blanca & Pérez, Carmen (2003). Etnografía virtualizada: la observación participante y la entrevista semiestructurada en línea. Athenea Digital, 3, 72-92.
6. Basset, E.H. & O'Riordan, Kathleen (2002). Ethics of Internet research: Contesting the human subjects research model. Ethics and Information Technology, 4(3), 233-247.
7. Bromseth, Janne C.H. (2002). Public places - public activities? Methodological approaches and ethical dilemmas in research on computer mediated communication contexts, http://www.intermedia.uio.no/konferanser/skikt- 02/docs/Researching_ICTs_in.context-Ch3-Bromseth.pdf [12/04/2007].
8. Efimova, Lilia (2004). Discovering the iceberg of knowledge work: A weblog case, https://doc.telin.nl/dscgi/ds.pv/Get/File-34786 [15/05/2007].
9. Elgesem, Dag (2002). What is special about the ethical issues in online research? Ethics and Information Technology, 4(3), 195-203.
10. Ess, Charles (2002). Ethical decision-making and Internet research: Recommendations from the AolR ethics working committee. Association of Internet Researchers (AolR), [15/05/2007].
11. Estalella, Adolfo (2005). Pobrecito hablador. Conflictos por la libre participación en una comunidad Colaborativa. Athenea Digital, 7, http://antalya.uab.es/athenea/num7/estalella.pdf [20/07/2006].
12. Forte, Maximilian (2004). Co-construction and field creation: Website development as both an instrument and relationship in action research. En Elizabeth A. Buchanan (Ed.), Readings in virtual research ethics: Issues and controversies (pp.219-245). Londres: Information Science Pub.
13. Geertz, Clifford (1973). Thick description: Toward an interpretative theory of culture. En Clifford Geertz (Ed.), The interpretation of cultures (pp.3-30). Nueva York: Basic Books.
14. Gómez, Leonor (2006). Tras las huellas de los e-nómadas; Reflexiones metodológicas de etnografía digital en foros de Extremadura, http://www.cibersociedad.net/congres2006/gts/comunicacio. php?&id=355 [11/03/2007].
15. Guber, Rosana (2004). El salvaje metropolitano. Reconstrucción del conocimiento social en el trabajo de campo. Buenos Aires: Paidós.
16. Hastrup, Kirsten (1999). A passage to anthropology. Between experience and theory. Londres: Routledge.
17. Hine, Christine (2000). Virtual ethnography. Londres: Sage.
18. Hudson, James M. & Bruckman, Amy (2002). IRC Francais: The creation of an Internet-based SLA community. Computer Assisted Language Learning (CALL), 15(2), 109-134.
19. King, Storm (1996). Researching Internet communities: Proposed ethical guidelines for the reporting of results. The Information Society, 12(2), 119-129.
20. Lin, Yuwei (2006). Mutuality between researchers and respondents in virtual ethnography, http://www.virtualknowledgestudio.nl/conferences/ virtual-ethnography/documents/abstract-lin.pdf [10/12/2006].
21. Mann, Chris & Stewart, Fiona (2000). Internet communication and qualitative research: A handbook for researching online. Londres: Sage.
22. Marcus, George E. (1995). Ethnography in/of the world system: The emergence of multi-sited ethnography. Annual Review of Anthropology, 24, 95-117.
23. Mayans, Joan (2002). Género Chat. O cómo la antropología puso un pie en el Clberespacio. Barcelona: Gedisa.
24. Miller, Daniel & Slater, Don (2000). The Internet. An ethnographie approach. Oxford: Berg.
25. NESH (2001). Guidelines for research ethics in the social sciences, law and the humanities. Oslo: The National Comittee for Research Ethics in the Social Sciences and the Humanities (NESH).
26. Peden, Blaine F. & Flashlnski, Douglas P. (2004). Virtual research ethics: A content analysis of surveys and experiments online. En Elizabeth Buchanan (Ed.), Readings in virtual research ethics: Issues and controversies (pp. 1-26). Londres: Information Science Pub.
27. Sharf, Barbara F. (1999). Beyond netiquette: The ethics of doing naturalistic discourse research on the Internet. En Steve Jones (Ed.), Doing Internet research: Critical issues and methods for examining the Net (pp.243-256). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
28. Sudweeks, Fay & Rafaeli, Sheizaf (1996). How do you get a hundred strangers to agree: Computer mediated communication and collaboration, http://gsb.haifa.ac.il/~shegaf/strangers.html [20/12/2006].
29. Takhteyev, Yuri & Hall, Josep (2005). Blogging together: Digital expression in a real-life community,
30. Velasco, Honorio & Díaz de Rada, Ángel (1997). La lógica de la investigación etnográfica. Valladolid: Trotta.
31. Walther, Joseph B. (2002). Research ethics in Internet-enabled research: Human subjects issues and methodological myopia. Ethics and Information Technology, 4(3), 205-216.
32. Wesch, Mike (2007). YouTube ethnography project, http://www.youtube.com/user/mwesch [19/05/2007].