Applying triple graph grammars for pattern-based workflow model transformations

Journal of Object Technology

Volumn 6, Issue 9, 2007, Pages 253-273

  Lohmann, Carsten ^a   Greenyer, Joel ^b   Jiang, Juanjuan ^c   Systä, Tarja ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SIEGEN   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PADERBORN   (Germany)

^c TAMPERE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 36048977644     PISSN: None     EISSN: 16601769     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5381/jot.2007.6.9.a13     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (39)

1. W.M.P. van der Aalst, A.H.M. ter Hofstede, B. Kiepuszewski, and A.P. Barros, Workflow Patterns.,Distributed and Parallel Databases, 14(3), pp. 5-51, July 2003.
2. W.M.P. van der Aalst, Patterns and XPDL: A Critical Evaluation of the XML Process Definition Language, QUT Technical report, FIT-TR-2003-06, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, 2003.
3. A. Agrawal, G. Karsai and F. Shi, Graph Transformations on Domain-Specific Models, Technical report, ISIS-03-403, Vanderbilt University, 2003.
4. L. Baresi, K. Ehrig, and R. Heckel, Verification of model transformations: A case study with BPEL, Proc. of the 2nd Symposium on Trustworthy Global Computing, TGC'06, 2006.
5. J. Bézivin, G. Dupé, F. Jouault, and J. E. Rougui, First experiments with the ATL model transformation language: Transforming XSLT into XQuery, In Proc. of the OOPSLA'03 Workshop on Generative Techniques in the Context of MDA, 2003.
6. BEA Systems, IBM Corp., Microsoft Corp., SAP AG, Siebel Systems, Business Process Execution Language for Web Services, Version 1.1. Specification, 2003.
7. Object Management Group, Business Process Modeling Notation, version 1.0, http://www.bpmn.org, 2006.
8. K. Czarnecki and S. Helsen, Classification of Model Transformation Approaches, In Proc. of the OOPSLA'03 Workshop on Generative Techniques in the Context of MDA, 2003.
9. The Eclipse Project, The Eclipse Modeling Framework http://www.eclipse.org/emf/, 2006.
10. R. Eshuis, P. Grefen and S. Till; Structured service composition; In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Business Process Management (BPM), Lecture Notes in Computer Science 4102, pp. 97-112, Springer, 2006
11. IBM, The Emerging Technologies Toolkit (ETTK), http://www.alphaworks.ibm. com/tech/ettk, 2006.
12. University of Paderborn, Fujaba Tool Suite, http://www.fujaba.de, 2006.
13. A. Gepting, J. Greenyer, E. Kindler, A. Maas, S. Munkelt, C. Pales, T. Pivl, O. Rohe, V. Rubin, M. Sander, A. Scholand, C. Wagner, R. Wagner: Component Tools: A vision for a tool. E. Kindler ed., Algorithmen und Werkzeuge für Petrinetze (AWPN) - Algorithms and Tools for Petri nets. Proc. of the AWPN workshop, pp. 37-42, 2004.
14. J. Greenyer, A Study of Model Transformation Technologies: Reconciling TGGs with QVT, University of Paderborn, MSc thesis, July 2006.
15. R. Grønmo and J. Oldevik, An empirical study of the UML Model Transformation Tool (UMT), In INTEROP-ESA, 2005.
16. T. Hornung, A. Koschmider, and J.Mendling, Integration of heterogeneous BPM Schemas: The Case of XPDL and BPEL,in CAiSE, 2006.
17. A. Kalnins, J. Barzdins and E. Celms, Model Transformation Language MOLA, In Proc. of MDAFA, pp. 14-28, 2004.
18. A. Kalnins and V. Vitolins, Use of UML and Model Transformations for Workflow Process Definitions, Communications of the 7th International Baltic Conference on Databases and Information Systems (Baltic DB&IS 2006)., Vilnius, Lithuania, July 3-6, pp. 3-14, 2006.
19. B. Kiepuszewski, A.H.M. ter Hofstede, and C. Bussler. On structured workflow modelling. In B. Wangler and L. Bergman, editors, Proc. CAiSE '00, Springer, pp. 431-445, 2000.
20. E. Kindler, V. Rubin, and R. Wagner, An Adaptable TGG Interpreter for In Memory Model Transformations, In Proc. of the FUJABA Days, pp. 35-38, 2004.
21. th International Conference on Theory and Application of Petri Nets 2006, LNCS 4024, pp. 37-56, 2006.
22. A. Königs, A. Schurr: MDI - a Rule-Based Multi-Document and Tool Integration Approach Special Section on Model-based Tool Integration in Journal of Software&System Modeling, Academic Press, 2006.
23. Object Management Group, Model Driven Architecture, http://www.omg.org/ mda, 2006.
24. J. Mendling, K. Lassen, and U. Zdun, Transformation strategies between block-oriented and graph-oriented process modelling languages, Technical Report JM2005-10-10, WU Vienna, http://wi.wuwien.ac.at/home/mendling/publications/TR05- Strategy.pdf, 2005.
25. T. Mens, P. V. Gorp, D. Varro, G. Karsai, Applying a Model Transformation Taxonomy to Graph Transformation Technology, In Proc. Int'l Workshop on Graph and Model Transformation (GraMoT 2005), Electronic Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 152 (2005), pp. 143-159, 2006.
26. Tata Consultancy Services (TCS), ModelMorf, http://www.tcstrddc.com/ ModelMorf/index.htm, 2006.
27. S. Demathieu, C. Griffin, and S. Sendall, Model Transformation with the IBM Model Transformation Framework, IBM, http://www-128.ibm.com/developerworks, 2005.
28. T. Pratt, Pair Grammars, Graph Languages and String-to-Graph Translations, Journal of Computer and System Sciences, volume 5, Academic Press, pp. 560-595, 1971.
29. Object Management Group, MOF QVT, Final Adopted Specification, http://www.omg.org, 2005.
30. A. Rito-Silva, S. Fernandes, J. Martins, and D. Domingos, Microworkflow component framework supporting service composition, INESC-ID, Deliverable IST-2001-37724 ACE-GIS D4.2, November 2003.
31. O. Rohe, Model Transformation by Interpreting TripleGraph Grammars: Evaluation and Case Study, University of Paderborn, BSc thesis, January, 2006.
32. A. Schürr, Specification of Graph Translators with Triple Graph Grammars, In Proceedings of the 20 International Workshop on Graph-Theoretic Concepts in Computer Science, Herrsching, Germany, June 1994. Springer Verlag, 1994.
33. D. Skogan, R.Grønmo, and I. Solheim, Web Service Composition in UML, In Proc. of EDOC, pp. 47-57, 2004.
34. France Telecom, SmartQVT, http://smartqvt.elibel.tm.fr/, 2006.
35. Borland, Together Architect 2006, http://www.borland.com/us/products/ together/index.html, 2006.
36. Object Management Group, Unified Modeling Language Specification, version 2.0, http://www.omg.org/uml/, 2005.
37. D. Varro, G. Varro and A. Pataricza, Designing the automatic transformation of visual languages, Science of Computer Programming, vol. 44(2), pp. 205-227, 2002.
38. Workflow Management Coalition, Workflow Process Definition Interface - XML Process Definition Language. Version 2.0, Document Number WFMC-TC-1025, 2005.
39. World Wide Web Consortium, XSL Transformations (XSLT) Version 1.0, http://www.w3.org/TR/xslt, 1999.