Ripening of cervix for induction of labour by hydrostatic sweeping of membrane versus Foley's catheter balloning alone

Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons Pakistan

Volumn 16, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 347-350

  Ifnan, Fakiha ^a,b   Jameel, M B ^a  

^a NISHTAR MEDICAL COLLEGE   (Pakistan)

^b Moza Taraf Mubarik Doaim   (Pakistan)

Author keywords

Cervical ripening; Cesarean section; Hydrostatic membrane sweeping; Intracervical Foley's catheter; Labour induction

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BALLOON DILATATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HYDROSTATIC PRESSURE; LABOR INDUCTION; METHODOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PREGNANCY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; UTERINE CERVIX RIPENING;

BALLOON DILATATION; CERVICAL RIPENING; FEMALE; HUMANS; HYDROSTATIC PRESSURE; LABOR, INDUCED; PREGNANCY;

EID: 36048976609     PISSN: 1022386X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. 1. Tenore JL. Methods for cervical ripening and induction of labour. Am Fam Physician 2003; 67: 2123-2128 (Pubitemid 36617394)
2. 2. Rayburn WF, Zhang J. Rising rates of labor induction: present concerns and future strategies. Obstet Gynecol 2002; 100: 164-167 (Pubitemid 34722857)
3. Jodie R, James RS. Cervical ripening. [Online] 2005 [cited 2005 Oct 20]. Available from: http://www.online-ambulance.com/ articles/doc/9/grp/Women/art/ CervicalR.htm
4. Baxley EG. Labor induction: a decade of change. Am Fam Physician 2003; 67: 2076-8, 2083-2084
5. 2 pessary for induction of labour. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak 2003; 13: 317-320
6. Rayburn WF. Pre-induction cervical ripening: basis and methods of current practice. Obstet Gynecol Surv 2002; 57: 683-692
7. 7. Levy R, Ferber A, Ben-Arie A, Paz B, Hazan Y, Blickstein I, et al. A randomized comparison of early versus late amniotomy following cervical ripening with a Foley catheter. BJOG 2002; 109: 168-172 (Pubitemid 37338038)
8. Adair CD. Nonpharmacological approaches to cervical priming and labour induction. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2000; 43: 447-454
9. Kelly AJ, Kavanagh J, Thomas J. Castor oil, bath, and/or enema for cervical priming and induction of labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2002; CD003099.
10. Kavanagh J, Kelly AJ, Thomas J. Sexual intercourse for cervical ripening and induction of labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2002; CD003093.
11. Beal MW. Acupuncture and acupressure: applications to women's reproductive health care. J Nurse Midwifery 1999; 44: 217-230
12. Barrilleaux PS, Bofill JA, Terrone DA, Magann EF, May WL, Morrison JC. Cervical ripening and induction of labour with misoprostol, dinoprostone gel and Foley catheter: a randomized trial of 3 techniques. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002; 186: 1124-1129
13. 2: a double blind randomized controlled study. Obstet Gynecol 2001, 97: 375-380
14. 14. Rust OA, Greybush M, Atlas RO, Jones KJ, Balducci J. Preinduction cervical ripening: a randomized trial of intravaginal misoprostol alone vs. a combination of transcervical Foley balloon and intravaginal misoprostol. J Reprod Med 2001; 46: 899-904. (Pubitemid 33032050)
15. 15. Niromanesh S, Mosavi-Jarrahi A, Samkhaniani F. Intracervical Foley catheter balloon vs. prostaglandin in preinduction cervical ripening. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2003; 81: 23-27 (Pubitemid 36379234)
16. Ekele BA, lsah AY. Cervical ripening: how long can the Foley catheter safely remain in the cervical canal? Afr J Reprod Health 2002; 6: 98-102.
17. 7. Sciscione AC, Muench M, Pollock M, Jenkins TM, Tildon-Burton J, Colmorgen GH. Transcervical Foley catheter for preinduction cervical ripening in an outpatient versus inpatient setting. Obstet Gynecol 2001; 98(5 pt 1):751-756 (Pubitemid 33042540)
18. 18. Siddiqui S, Zubari NF, Zafar A, Qureshi RN. Increased risk of cervical canal infection with intracervical Foley catheter. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak 2003; 13: 146-149 (Pubitemid 36527339)
19. 2 pessary, intracervical Foley's catheter and extra-amniotic saline infusion. J Surg 2000; 19-20: 12-18
20. Binti RB, Parul SS, Jignesh JK, Shashank VP. Induction of labour by Foley's catheter. J Bombay Hospital 2003: 297-300.
21. 21. Dalui R, Suri V, Ray P, Gupta I. Comparison of extra amniotic Foley's catheter and intracervical prostaglandin E gel for preinduction cervical ripening. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2005; 84: 362-367 (Pubitemid 40478185)
22. 22. Adeniji OA, Oladokun A, Olayemi O, Adeniji Ol, Ogunbode O, Odukogbe AA, et al. Pre-induction cervical ripening: transcervical Foley's catheter versus intravaginal misoprostol. J Obstet Gynaecol 2005; 25: 134-139 (Pubitemid 43323027)
23. 23. Guinn DA, Davies JK, Jones RO, Sullivan L, Wolf D. Labour induction in women with an unfavorable Bishop score: randomized controlled trial of intrauterine Foley catheter with concurrent oxytocin infusion versus Foley catheter with extraamniotic saline infusion with concurrent oxytocin infusion. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004; 191: 225-229 (Pubitemid 39077980)
24. Fernanda GCS, Jose GC, Fabiana K, Ricardo PT, Mary AP. Cervical ripening methods for labour induction. Rev Bras Saude Matern Infant Recife 2004; 4: 125-133
25. 25. Sciscione A, Larkin M, O'Shea A, Pollock M, Hoffman M, Colmorgen G. Pre-induction cervical ripening with the Foley catheter and the risk of subsequent preterm birth. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004; 190:751-754 (Pubitemid 38406788)
26. 26. Bujold E, Blackwell SC, Gauthier RJ. Cervical ripening with transcervical Foley catheter and the risk of uterine rupture. Obstet Gynecol 2004; 103: 18-23. (Pubitemid 39248461)