Entry, reforms, complementarity and performance: A tale of two Indian manufacturing sectors

Economic Systems

Volumn 31, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 375-390

  Bhaumik, Sumon Kumar ^a,b,c   Gangopadhyay, Shubhashis ^d   Krishnan, Shagun ^d  

^a BRUNEL UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b IZA   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^d India Development Foundation   (India)

Author keywords

Efficiency; Electrical machinery; India; Industry; Reforms; Textiles

Indexed keywords

EID: 36048969755     PISSN: 09393625     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecosys.2007.08.004     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Banerjee, A.V., Duflo, E., 2002. The nature of credit constraints: evidence from an Indian bank. MIT Working Paper 02-05. Cambridge, MA.
2. Berger, A.N., Klapper, L.F., Peria, M.S.M., Zaidi, R. The effects of bank ownership type on banking relationships and multiple banking in developing countries: detailed evidence from India. Journal of Financial Intermediation.
3. Besley T., and Burgess R. Can labor regulation hinder economic performance? Evidence from India. Q. J. Econ. 119 (2004) 91-134
4. Bhaumik, S.K., Gangopadhyay, S., Krishnan, S., 2006. Reforms, entry and productivity: some evidence from the Indian manufacturing sector. IZA Discussion Paper 2086. Bonn.
5. Bose S., and Coondoo D. The Indian bond market: Part II. ICRA's Bulletin: Money Finance July-September (1999) 51-60
6. Chand S., and Sen K. Trade liberalization and productivity growth: Evidence from Indian manufacturing. Rev. Dev. Econ. 6 (2002) 120-132
7. D'Souza E. The WTO and the Politics of Reform in India's Textile Sector: From Inefficient Redistribution to Industrial Upgradation (2005), Mimeo, Indian Institute of Management, Ahmedabad
8. Gangopadhyay S., and Knopf J.D. Dividends and conflicts between equityholders and debtholders with weak monitoring: the case of India. In: Doukas J., Murinde V., and Wihlborg C. (Eds). Financial Sector Reform and Privatization in Transition Economies (1998), North-Holland, Amsterdam 95-120
9. Hasan, R., Mitra, D., Ramaswamy, K.V., 2003. Trade reforms, labor regulations and labor demand elasticities: empirical evidence from India. NBER Working paper 9879. Cambridge, MA.
10. Khanna S.R. International Trade in Textiles: MFA Quotas and a Developing Exporting Country (1991), ICRIER and Sage Publications, New Delhi
11. Kumbhakar S., and Knox Lovell C.A. Stochastic Frontier Analysis (2000), Cambridge University Press, New York
12. Kumbhakar S., and Tsionas E.G. Estimation of stochastic frontier production functions with input-oriented technical efficiency. J. Econometrics 133 (2006) 71-96
13. Lall S.V., and Chakravorty S. Industrial location and spatial inequality: theory and evidence from India. Rev. Dev. Econ. 9 (2005) 47-68
14. Rodrik, D., Subramanian, A., 2004. From 'Hindu growth' to productivity surge: the mystery of the Indian growth transition. CEPR Discussion Paper 4371. London.
15. Roychowdhury S. Political economy of India's textile industry: the case of Maharashtra, 1984-89. Pac. Aff. 68 (1995) 231-250
16. Sivadasan, J., 2003. Barriers to entry and productivity: micro-evidence from Indian manufacturing sector reforms. Mimeo, University of Chicago, available at: http://bpp.wharton.upenn.edu/Documents/Sivadasan_AEW_paper_1_16_04.pdf.