Effects of vasodilation on cardiac output measured by PulseCO™

Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing

Volumn 21, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 335-339

  Yamashita, Koichi ^a   Nishiyama, Tomoki ^b   Yokoyama, Takeshi ^a   Abe, Hidehiro ^a   Manabe, Masanobu ^a  

^a KOCHI MEDICAL SCHOOL   (Japan)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

Author keywords

Cardiac output; Prostaglandin E1; Pulse contour method; Thermodilution method; Vasodilation

Indexed keywords

ANESTHETICS; BIOMATERIALS; CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY; DILUTION; DRUG INFUSION; GRAFTING (CHEMICAL);

CARDIAC OUTPUT; OFF-PUMP CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFTING; PROSTAGLANDIN; PULSE CONTOUR METHOD; THERMODILUTION METHOD; VASODILATION;

BLOOD VESSELS;

PROSTAGLANDIN E1;

ADULT; AGED; ANALYTICAL EQUIPMENT; ANESTHESIA INDUCTION; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; FEMALE; HEART OUTPUT MEASUREMENT; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; OFF PUMP CORONARY SURGERY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SYSTEMATIC ERROR; SYSTEMIC VASCULAR RESISTANCE; THERMODILUTION; VASODILATATION;

AGED; ALPROSTADIL; BLOOD PRESSURE; CARDIAC OUTPUT; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS, OFF-PUMP; EQUIPMENT FAILURE; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEMALE; HEART CATHETERIZATION; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MONITORING, PHYSIOLOGIC; PULSATILE FLOW; THERMODILUTION; VASCULAR RESISTANCE; VASODILATION;

EID: 36048965479     PISSN: 13871307     EISSN: 15732614     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10877-007-9093-9     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Linton NWF, Linton RAF. Estimation of changes in cardiac output from the arterial blood pressure waveform in the upper limb. Br J Anaesth 2001;86: 486-496
2. Van Lieshout JJ, Wesseling KH. Editorial II continuous cardiac output by pulse contour analysis? Br J Anaesth 2001; 86: 467-468
3. Jansen JRC, Schreuder JJ, Mulier JP, Smith NT, Settels JJ, Wesseling KH. A comparison of cardiac output derived from the arterial pressure wave against thermodilution in cardiac surgery patients. Br J Anaesth 2001; 87: 212-222
4. Rödig G, Prasser C, Keyl C, Keyl C, Liebold A, Hobbhahan J. Continuous cardiac output measurement: Pulse contour analysis vs thermodilution technique in cardiac surgery patients. Br J Anaesth 1999; 82: 525-530
5. Yamashita K, Nishiyama T, Yokoyama T, Abe H, Manabe M. Cardiac output by PulseCO™ is not interchangeable with thermodilution in patients undergoing OPCAB. Can J Anesth 2005; 52: 530-534
6. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; 8476: 307-310
7. Linton R, Band D, O'Brien T, Jonas M, Leach R. Lithium dilution cardiac output measurement: A comparison with thermodilution. Crit Care Med 1997; 25: 1796-1800
8. Jonas MM, Tanser SJ. Lithium dilution measurement of cardiac output and arterial pulse waveform analysis: An indicator dilution calibrated beat-by-beat system for continuous estimation of cardiac output. Curr Opin Crit Care 2002; 8: 257-261
9. Connors AF Jr, Speroff T, Thomas C. The effectiveness of right heart catheterization in the initial care of critically ill patients. JAMA 1996; 276: 889-897
10. Jones CJ, Sugawara M, Kondoh Y, Uchida K, Parker KH. Compression and expansion wavefront travel in caine ascending aortic flow: Wave intensity analysis. Heart Vessels 2002; 16: 91-98
11. 1 on microcirculation of rat cremaster muscle. Microsurgery 1990; 11: 204-208
12. Miyabe M, Fukuda T, Saito S, Tajima K, Toyooka H. Effect of intravenous prostaglandin E1 on pig veesel diameters and intracranial pressure in rabbits. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2001; 45: 1271-1275
13. 2 in surgical patients under general anesthesia. Prostaglandins Leukotriens Med 1985; 18: 359-366
14. Bajorat J, Hofmockel R, Vagts DA, Janda M, Pohl B, Beck C, Noeldge-Schomburg G. Comparison of invasive and less-invasive techniques of cardiac output measurement under different haemodynamic conditions in a pig model. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2006; 23: 23-30
15. Critchley LAH, Critchley JAJH. A meta-analysis of studies using bias and precision statistics to compare cardiac output measurement techniques. J Clin Monit 1999; 15: 85-91