Phenomena-based modularisation of chemical process models to approach intensive options

Chemical Engineering Journal

Volumn 135, Issue 1-2, 2008, Pages 83-94

  Arizmendi Sanchez J A ^a   Sharratt, P N ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Behaviour; Object oriented modularisation; Phenomena based modelling; Process intensification; Structure

Indexed keywords

CONSTRAINT THEORY; GRAPH THEORY; MATHEMATICAL MODELS;

OBJECT-ORIENTED MODULARIZATION; PHENOMENA-BASED MODELING; PROCESS INTENSIFICATION;

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING;

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING; CONSTRAINT THEORY; GRAPH THEORY; MATHEMATICAL MODELS;

EID: 36048963255     PISSN: 13858947     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2007.02.017     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Tsouris C., and Porcelli J.V. Process intensification-has its time finally come. Chem. Eng. Prog. 99 10 (2003) 50-55
2. Matlosz M. Integrated multiscale process units with locally structured elements. Proceedings of the AIChE Annual Meeting. Austin, Texas (2004)
3. Stitt E.H. Alternative multiphase reactors for fine chemicals. A world beyond stirred tanks?. Chem. Eng. J. 90 1-2 (2002) 47-60
4. Lerou J.J., and Ng K.M. Chemical reaction engineering: a multiscale approach to a multiobjective task. Chem. Eng. Sci. 51 10 (1996) 1595-1614
5. Ingram G.D., Cameron I.T., and Hangos K.M. Classification and analysis of integrating frameworks in multiscale modelling. Chem. Eng. Sci. 59 (2004) 2171-2187
6. Arizmendi-Sánchez J.A., and Sharratt P.N. Multilevel phenomenological modelling approach to support the evaluation and generation of intensified processes. Proceedings of the European Symposium on Computer-Aided Process Engineering-15. Computer-Aided Chemical Engineering, 20A (2005) 901-906
7. Arizmendi-Sánchez J.A., and Sharratt P.N. Phenomena-based models to encourage intensive design: challenging the paradigm of unit operations. Proceedings of the Process Development Symposium. Palm Springs, AIChE (2006)
8. Siirola J. An industrial perspective on process synthesis. Proceedings of the AIChE Symposium Series, 91 (1995) 222-233
9. Mangold M., Motz S., and Gilles E.D. A network theory for the structured modelling of chemical processes. Chem. Eng. Sci. 57 (2002) 4099-4116
10. Shah N., Samsatli N.J., Sharif M., Borland J.N., and Papageorgiou L.G. Modelling and optimisation for pharmaceutical and fine chemical process development. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Foundations Computer Aided Process Design. Breckenbridge, USA (1999)
11. Sharratt P.N., Wall K., and Borland J.N. Crossing the border-chemistry and chemical engineering in process design. Proceedings of the 6th World Congress of Chemical Engineering. Melbourne (2001)
12. Batres R., Aoyama A., and Naka Y. A life-cycle approach for model reuse and exchange. Comput. Chem. Eng. 26 (2002) 487-498
13. Gavrila I.S., and Iedema P. Phenomena-driven process design, a knowledge-based approach. Proceedings of the European Symposium on Computer Aided Process Engineering-6. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 20 (1996) S103-S108
14. Pohjola V.J., Alha M.K., and Ainassaari J. Methodology of process design. Comput. Chem. Eng. 18 (1994) S307-S311
15. Hauan S., Westerberg A.W., and Lien K.M. Phenomena-based analysis of fixed points in reactive separation systems. Chem. Eng. Sci. 55 6 (2000) 1053-1075
16. Rong B., Kolehmainen E., Turunen I., and Hurme M. Phenomena-based methodology for process intensification. Proceedings of the European Symposium on Computer-Aided Process Engineering-14. Computer-aided Chemical Engineering, 18 (2004) 481-486
17. Stephanopoulos G., Henning G., and Leone H. Model La-a modeling language for process engineering. 1. The formal framework. Comput. Chem. Eng. 14 8 (1990) 813-846
18. Catino C.A., Grantham S.D., and Ungar L.H. Automatic generation of qualitative models of chemical process units. Comput. Chem. Eng. 15 8 (1991) 583-599
19. E.A. Woods, The Hybrid Phenomena Theory, Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Engineering Cybernetics, Norwegian Institute of Technology, Trondheim, Norway, 1993.
20. Marquardt W. Trends in computer-aided process modeling. Comput. Chem. Eng. 20 6-7 (1996) 591-609
21. Drengstig T., Wasbø S.O., and Foss B.A. A formal graphical based process modeling methodology. Comput. Chem. Eng. 21 (1997) S835-S840
22. Dieterich E.E., and Eigenberger G. The ModuSim concept for modular modeling and simulation in chemical engineering. Comput. Chem. Eng. 21 Suppl. (1997) S805-S809
23. Gilles E.D. Network theory for chemical processes. Chem. Eng. Technol. 21 2 (1998) 121-132
24. Linninger A.A., Chowdhry S., Bahl V., Krendl H., and Pinger H. A systems approach to mathematical modeling of industrial processes. Comput. Chem. Eng. 24 2-7 (2000) 591-598
25. Tränkle F., Zeitz M., Ginkel M., and Gilles E.D. PROMOT: a modelling tool for chemical processes. Math. Comput. Model. Dynam. Syst. 6 3 (2000) 283-307
26. Bogusch R., Lohmann B., and Marquardt W. Computer-aided process modeling with ModKit. Comput. Chem. Eng. 25 7-8 (2001) 963-995
27. Lind M. Modelling goals and functions of complex industrial plants. J. Appl. Artif. Intell. 8 (1994) 259-283
28. Chittaro L., Guida G., Tasso C., and Toppano E. Functional and teleological knowledge in the multimodeling approach for reasoning about physical systems: a case study in diagnosis. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics 23 6 (1993) 1718-1751
29. Chandrasekaran B., Josephson J., and Keuneke A. Functional representations as a basis for generating explanations. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics (1986)
30. Klir G.J. An Approach to General Systems Theory (1969), Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, New York p. 323
31. de Kleer J. How circuits work. In: Bobrow D.G. (Ed). Qualitative Reasoning about Physical Systems (1985), MIT Press
32. Gerstlauer A., Hierlemann M., and Marquardt W. On the representation of balance equations in a knowledge based process modeling tool. Proceedings of the CHISA '93. Prague (1993)
33. Arizmendi-Sánchez J.A., and Sharratt P.N. Phenomenological modelling approach to support the implementation of process intensification in process design. Proceedings of the 7th World Congress of Chemical Engineering. Glasgow (2005)
34. Perkins J.D., Sargent R.W.H., Vazquez-Roman R., and Cho J.H. Computer generation of process models. Comput. Chem. Eng. 20 6-7 (1996) 635-639
35. Mehta V.L., and Kokossis A. Development of novel multiphase reactors using a systematic design framework. Comput. Chem. Eng. 21 (1997) S325-S330
36. Arizmendi-Sanchez J.A., Sharratt P.N., and Wall K. Phenomena-based topological representation of chemical processes. Proceedings of the AIChE Annual Meeting (2005)
37. Wall K., Sharratt P.N., Sadr-Kazemi N., and Borland J.N. Plant-independent process representation. Org. Proc. Res. Dev. 5 4 (2001) 434-437
38. Sharratt P.N. Qualitative frameworks for early stage process design. Proceedings of the AIChE Annual Meeting (2005)
39. Forbus K.D. Qualitative process theory. Artif. Intell. 24 (1984) 85-168
40. Umeda T., Kuriyama T., O'Shima E., and Matsuyama H. Graphical approach to cause and effect analysis of chemical processing systems. Chem. Eng. Sci. 35 12 (1980) 2379-2388
41. Iwasaki Y., and Simon H.A. Causality in device behaviour. Artif. Intell. 29 (1986) 3-32
42. Grantham S.D., and Ungar L.H. A first principles approach to automated troubleshooting of chemical plants. Comput. Chem. Eng. 14 7 (1990) 783-798