A metamodel independent approach to difference representation

Journal of Object Technology

Volumn 6, Issue 9, 2007, Pages 165-185

  Cicchetti, Antonio ^a   Di Ruscio, Davide ^a   Pierantonio, Alfonso ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF L'AQUILA   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 36048951507     PISSN: None     EISSN: 16601769     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5381/jot.2007.6.9.a9     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. M. Alanen and I. Porres. Difference and Union of Models. In Procs. UML 2003, volume 2863 of LNCS, pages 2-17.
2. D. T. Barnard, G. Clarke, and N. Duncan. Tree-to-tree correction for document trees. Technical report, Departement of Computing and Information Science Queen's University Kingston, Canada, Jan 1995.
3. J. Bézivin. On the Unification Power of Models. SOSYM, 4(2): 171-188, 2005.
4. J. Bézivin, F. Jouault, P. Rosenthal, and P. Valduriez. Modeling in the Large and Modeling in the Small. In Model Driven Architecture, ECMDA Workshops: Foundations and Applications, volume 3599 of LNCS, pages 33-46, 2004.
5. F. Budinsky, D. Steinberg, E. Merks, R. Ellersick, and T.J. Grose. Eclipse Modeling Framework. Addison Wesley, 2003.
6. M. Carey. Data Delivery in a Service Oriented World: The BEA AquaLogic Data Services Platform.
7. S.-Y. Chien, V. J. Tsotras, and C. Zaniolo. Version Management of XML Documents, volume 1997 of LNCS, pages 184-200. Springer-Verlag.
8. A. Cicchetti, D. Di Ruscio, and A. Pierantonio. Composition of Model Differences. In Procs. CMT 2006, number TR-CTIT-06-34 in CTIT Technical Reports.
9. A. Cicchetti, D. Di Ruscio, and A. Pierantonio. ATL Use Case A Metamodel Independent Approach to Difference Representation, 2007. http://www.eclipse.org/ m2m/atl/usecases/MMIndApproachtoDiffRep/.
10. R. Conradi and B. Westfechtel. Version models for software configuration management. ACM Computing Surveys, 30(2):232-282, 1998.
11. S. Ducasse and S. Demeyer. The FAMOOS Object-Oriented Reengineering Handbook.
12. S. G. Eick, T. L. Graves, A. F. Karr, J. S. Marron, and A. Mockus. Does code decay? assessing the evidence from change management data. IEEE Trans. Software Eng., 27(1):1-12, 2001.
13. S. G. Eick, J. L. Steffen, and E. E. Sumner Jr. Seesoft-a tool for visualizing line oriented software statistics. IEEE Trans. Software Eng., 18(11):957-968, 1992.
14. M. Fischer, M. Pinzger, and H. Gall. Populating a release history database from version control and bug tracking systems. In Procs. ICSM 2003, pages 23-32. IEEE Computer Society.
15. T. Girba and S. Ducasse. Modeling History to Analyze Software Evolution. J. Softw. Maint. Evol.: Res, Pract., 18:207-236, 2006.
16. F. Jouault and J. Bézivin. KM3: a DSL for Metamodel Specification. In Procs. FMOODS'06, volume 4037 of LNCS, pages 171-185.
17. F. Jouault, J. Bézivin, and I. Kurtev. TCS: a DSL for the Specification of Textual Concrete Syntaxes in Model Engineering. In Procs. Fifth Intl. Conference on Generative Programming and Component Engineering (GPCE'06), 2006. to appear.
18. F. Jouault and I. Kurtev. Transforming Models with ATL. In MoDELS Satellite Events, volume 3844 of LNCS, pages 128-138. Springer-Verlag, 2005.
19. A. Ledeczi, M. Maroti, A. Bakay, G. Karsai, J. Garrett, C. Thomason, G. Nordstrom, J. Sprinkle, and P. Volgyesi. The Generic Modeling Environment. In Workshop on Intelligent Signal Processing, 2001.
20. Y. Lin, J. Gray, and F. Jouault. DSMDiff: A Differentiation Tool for DomainSpecific Models, Dec 2006.
21. T. Mens. A state-of-the-art survey on software merging. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng., 28(5):449-462, 2002.
22. D. Ohst, M. Welle, and U. Kelter. Differences between versions of UML diagrams. In Procs. ESEC/FSE2003, pages 227-236. ACM Press.
23. OMG. Meta Object Facility (MOF) 2.0 Core Specification, OMG Documentptc/0310-04. http://www.omg.org/docs/ptc/03-10-04.pdf, 2003.
24. OMG. OCL 2.0 Specification, 2006. OMG Document formal/2006-05-01.
25. D. Roundy. Dares 1.0.9rc2 Official Manual.
26. S. M. Selkow. The tree-to-tree editing problem. Information Processing Letters, 6(6):184-186, 1977.
27. K.-C. Tai. The tree-to-tree correction problem. Journal of the ACM, 26(3):422-433, 1979.
28. S. Tichelaar, S. Ducasse, and S. Demeyer. FAMIX and XMI. In Proceedings WCRE 2000 Workshop on Exchange Formats, pages 296-299, 2000.
29. Z. Xing and E. Strouha. UMLDiff: an algorithm for object-oriented design differencing. In 20th IEEE/ACM ASE, pages 54-65. ACM, 2005.
30. K. Zhang and D. Shasha. Simple fast algorithms for the editing distance between trees and related problems. SIAM Journal of Computing, 18(6): 1245-1262, 1989.