Perceptions about copyright of digital content and its effects on scholarship: A South African perspective

Libri

Volumn 57, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 84-91

  Masango, Charles A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAPE TOWN   (South Africa)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 36048942399     PISSN: 00242667     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1515/LIBR.2007.84     Document Type: Review

References (32)

1. Amen, K., T. Keogh and N. Wolff. 2002. Digital copyright: A tale of domestic discord, presented in three Acts. Computers in libraries 22(5): 22-27.
2. Baldwin, C. 2001. Electronic copyright: A publisher's view. Available at URL: http://users.aber.ac.uk/mdt/ copyrite/superj.htm [viewed July 25, 2006].
3. Braunstein, P. 2000. Cracking DVD Code: MPAA's dragooning of Norwegian teen raises hackers' hackles. LA Weekly 11-17, 2000. Available at URL: http://www.laweekly.com/ink/00/12/cyberbraunstein.php [viewed July 25, 2006].
4. Bygrave, L. A. 2002. The technologisation of copyright: implications for privacy and related interests. European intellectual property reviews 24(2): 51-57. Available at URL: http://folk.uio.no/lee/publications/ technologisation_copyright_eipr_final.pdf [viewed July 25, 2006].
5. Copeling, A.J.C. 1978. Copyright and the Act of 1978. Durban: Butterworths.
6. Croft, J. B. 2005. Interlibrary loan and licensing: tools for proactive contract management. Journal of library administration 42(3/4): 41-53.
7. Digital Millennium Copyright Act. 1998. The Digital Millennium Copyright Act of 1998: Copyright Office Summary. Pub. L. No. 105-304, 112 Stat. 2860 (Oct. 28, 1998). Available at URL: http://www.loc.gov/ copyright/ legislation/dmca.pdf [viewed July 25, 2006].
8. Emery, J. 2005. Is our best good enough? Educating end-users about licensing terms. Journal of library administration 42(3/4): 27-39.
9. Harper, G. 2004. Copyright and the university community: implementing a comprehensive copyright policy. Available at URL: http://www.utsystem.edu/ ogc/ intellectualproperty/admin3.htm [viewed July 25, 2006].
10. Hofman, J. 1999. Cyberlaw: a guide for South Africans doing business online. Cape Town: Ampersand Press.
11. HSRC Education Research Programme, No. 8. 1987. Copyright and education and training in the Republic of South Africa. Pretoria: Human Sciences Research Council.
12. International Coalition of Library Consortia. 2001. Statement of current perspective and preferred practices for the selection and purchase of electronic information: Update No.1: new developments in e-journal licensing. Available at URL: http://www.library.yale.edu/consortia/ 2001currentpractices.htm [viewed July 25, 2006].
13. JSTOR terms and conditions. 2005. Available at URL: http://www.jstor.org/about/terms.html [viewed July 25, 2006].
14. nd ed. London: Bowker Saur.
15. Lahore, J. and WA. Rothnie. 2004. Digital Agenda - The Copyright Amendment (Digital Agenda) Act 2000. Sydney, Australia: Butterworths. 1-Commentary
16. Leaffer, M. 1989. Understanding copyright law. New York: Matthew Bender.
17. Liebowitz, S. 2002. Policing pirates in the networked age. Policy analysis 438, May 15, 2002. Available at URL: http://www.cato.org/pubs/pas/ pa438.pdf [viewed July 25, 2006].
18. Litman, J. 1996. Revising copyright law for the information age. Available at URL: http://www.law.cornell.edu/ commentary/intelpro/litrvtxt.htm [viewed July 21, 2005].
19. Loundy, D. 1995. Revising the copyright law for electronic publishing. Available at URL: http://www.loundy com/Revising-HyperT.html [viewed July 25, 2006].
20. Malhotra, D. N. 1995. Copyright: a perspective from the developing world. In Copyright and development: inequality in the information age. Edited by Philip G. Altbach. Boston: Bellagio Publishing Network. 4: 35-48.
21. nd ed. Edited by Chris Armstrong & Laurence W. Bebbington. London: Facet Publishing. 122-139.
22. Muir, A. 2003. Copyright and licensing for digital preservation. Library + information update 2(6): 34-36.
23. th ed. Aldershot: Gower.
24. Punch, K.F. 1998. Introduction to social research: quantitative and qualitative approaches. London: Sage.
25. Samuelson, P. 1994. Copyright, digital data, and fair use in digital networked environments. Available at URL: http://www.lexum.umontreal.ca/ conf/ae/en/ samuelson.html [viewed July 25, 2006].
26. ScienceDirect Subscriber Licence. 1999. Available at URL: http://www.griffith.edu.au/ins/collections/ ejournal/elsevier.pdf [viewed July 25, 2006].
27. Shenton, A.K. and P. Dixon. 2004. Debates and paradoxes surrounding the use of qualitative methods. Education for information 22(1): 1-12.
28. th ed. Cape Town: Juta Law. 2:220-234.
29. Trosow, S.E. 2003. The illusive search for justification theories: copyright, commodification and capital. Canadian journal of law and jurisprudence 16(2): 217241.
30. United Kingdom Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (c.48). 2000. Miscellaneous and general: devices designed to circumvent copy-protection. Available at URL: http://www.hmso.gov.uk/acts/actsl988/ Ukpga_19880048_en_21.htm#mdiv296 [viewed July 25,2006].
31. Williams, S. 2002. Free as in freedom: Richard Stallman's crusade for free software. Sebastopol: O'Reilly & Associates.
32. Wyatt, A. M. 2005. Licences, the law, and libraries, journal of library administration 42(3/4): 163-176.