Reply to "Letter to the editor: 'Ocular lens does not change volume during accommodation'" [2]

American Journal of Physiology - Cell Physiology

Volumn 293, Issue 5, 2007, Pages

  Candia, Oscar A ^a  

^a MOUNT SINAI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CYANOACRYLATE; GLUE; SOLVENT;

ACCOMMODATION; CAMERA; CAPSULAR SURFACE; CILIARY BODY; CROSS SECTIONAL AREA; EQUATORIAL LENGTH; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IRIS; LENS; LENS CAPSULE; LENS VOLUME; LETTER; NONHUMAN; PARAMETER; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

EID: 36048940292     PISSN: 03636143     EISSN: 15221563     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1152/ajpcell.00294.2007     Document Type: Letter

References (6)

1. Augusteyn RC, Rosen AM, Borja D, Ziebarth NM, Parel JM. Biometry of primate lenses during immersion in preservation media. Mol Vis 12: 740-747, 2006.
2. Gerometta R, Zamudio AC, Escobar DP, Candia OA. Volume change of the ocular lens during accommodation. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 293: C797-C804, 2007.
3. Kuszak JR, Mazurkiewicz M, Jison L, Madurski A, Ngando A, Zoltoski RK. Quantitative analysis of animal model lens anatomy: accommodative range is related to fiber structure and organization. Vet Ophthalmol 9: 266-280, 2006.
4. Rosen AM, Denham DB, Fernandez V, Borja D, Ho A, Manns F, Parel JM, Augusteyn RC. In vitro dimensions and curvatures of human lenses. Vision Res 46: 1002-1009, 2006.
5. Schachar RA, Liao GG. The ocular lens does not change volume during accommodation (Letter to the editor). Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 293: C797-C804, 2007.
6. Strenk SA, Strenk LM, Semmlow JL, DeMarco JK. Magnetic resonance imaging study of the effects of age and accommodation on the human lens cross-sectional area. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 45: 539-545, 2004.