Constructing a specific culture: Young people's use of the mobile phone as a social performance

Convergence

Volumn 10, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 28-61

  Caronia, Letizia ^a   Caron, André H ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BOLOGNA   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

^c CITÉ Centre for Interdisciplinary Research on Emerging Technologies

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 36048936186     PISSN: 13548565     EISSN: 17487382     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/135485650401000204     Document Type: Article

References (79)

1. From a radically ethnomethodological-constructionist perspective, the cultural models that organise everyday life in intersubjectively shared ways are seen as constructed moment-by-moment by the ways people participate in social events. See H. Garfinkel, Studies in Ethnomethodology (Englewood Cliff: Prentice Hall, 1967);
2. P. Giglioli and A. Dal Lago (eds), Etnometodologia (Bologna: Il Mulino, 1983).
3. Adopting a bottom-up analytical perspective, the constructionist approach conceives the structures and the meanings of social action as products of the creative process of culture-making through everyday actions and discourses. Of course, this radically bottom-up view may be counterbalanced by the cognitive perspective on cultural models. See, R. D'Andrade, 'Cultural Meaning Systems' in D. Holland and N. Quinn (eds), Cultural Models in Language and Thought (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987);
4. R. D'Andrade and C. Strauss (eds), Human Motives and Cultural Models (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992).
5. K.J. Gergen and G.R. Semin, 'Everyday Understanding in Science and Daily Life' in G.R. Semin and K.J. Gergen (eds), Everyday Understanding: Social and Scientific Implications (London: Sage);
6. P. Jedlowski, 'Tra fenomenologia e sociologia', Encyclopaideia. Rivista di pedagogia, fenomenologia, formazione, 2, no. 1 (1998), pp. 111-118.
7. M. De Certeau, L'invention du quotidien (Paris: UGE, 1980);
8. A. Appadurai (ed), The Social Life of Things (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986);
9. B. Latour, Aramis, ou l'amour de techniques (Paris: la Découverte, 1992);
10. A. Gras, B. Jorges and V. Scardigli (eds), Sociologie des techniques de la vie quotidienne (Paris: L'Harmattan, 1992);
11. A. Semprini, L'objet comme procès et comme action (Paris: L'Harmattan, 1995);
12. A. Semprini (ed), Il senso delle cose. I significati sociali e culturali degli oggetti quotidiani (Milano: Franco Angeli, 1999).
13. S. Livingstone, 'The Meaning of Domestic Technologies: A Personal Construct Analysis of Familial Gender Relations' in R. Silverstone and E. Hirsch (eds), Consuming technologies. Media and Information in Domestic Spaces (London: Routledge, 1992); Semprini, 1995;
14. A.H. Caron and L. Caronia, 'Active Users and Active Objects. The Mutual Construction of Families and Communication Technologies', Convergence, 7, no 3 (2001), pp. 39-61;
15. E. Lally, At Home With Computers (Oxford: Berg, 2002).
16. L. Caronia, La socializzazione ai media. Contesti, interazioni e pratiche educative (Milano: Guerini. 2002).
17. P. Jedlowski, Storie comuni. La narrazione nella vita quotidiana (Milano: Bruno Mondadori, 2000), p. 58.
18. D. Boden and H.L. Molotch, 'The Compulsion of Proximity' in R. Friedland and D. Boden (eds), Now/Here. Space, Time and Modernity (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1994), pp. 257-286.
19. E. Ochs and L. Capps, 'Narrating the Self', Annual Review of Anthropology, 25 (1996), pp. 19-43.
20. S. Livingstone and M. Bovill (eds), Children and Their Changing Media Environment. A European Comparative Study (London: Lawrence Erlbaum, 2001).
21. See, among others, I. Pool (ed), The Social Impact of Telephone (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1977);
22. E. Schegloff, 'Identification and Recognition in Telephone Conversation Openings' in G. Psathas (ed), Everyday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology (New York: Irvington, 1979), pp. 23-78;
23. C. Fisher, America Calling: A Social History of the Telephone to 1940 (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1992);
24. D. Zimmerman Umble, 'The Amish and the telephone. Resistence and reconstruction' in R. Silverstone and E. Hirsch (eds), 1992, pp. 183-194;
25. V. Manceron, 'Tous en ligne: usage sociaux et modes d'interaction au sein d'un réseau de jeunes parisiens', Réseaux, no. 82-83 (1997), pp. 205-217;
26. N. Baron, 'History Lessons: Telegraph, Telephone, and E-mail as Social Discourse' in B. Naumann (ed), Dialogue Analysis and the Mass Media. Proceedings of the International Conference, Erlangen, 2-3 April 1998 (Tübingen: Niemeyer, 1999), pp. 1-34;
27. F. Bercelli and G. Pallotti, 'Conversazioni telefoniche' in C. Bazzanella (ed), Sul dialogo (Milano: Guerini, 2002), pp. 177-192.
28. E. Katz and A. Aakhus, Perpetual Contact. Mobile Communication, Private Talk, Public Performance (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002).
29. E. Mante, 'The Netherlands and the USA compared' in E. Katz and A. Aakhus, 2002.
30. P. Jukka-Pekka, 'Finland, a Mobile Culture', in E. Katz and A. Aakhus, 2002.
31. See R. Ling '"C'est bien d'être joignable": l'usage du téléphone cellulaire et mobile chez les jeunes norvégiens', Réseaux, nos. 92-93 (1999), pp. 261-291;
32. R. Ling and B. Yttri,' 'Nobody sits at home and waits for the telephone to ring': Micro and Hyper coordination throug the use of the mobile telephone', Report no. 30/99, Telenor Research and Development (Oslo, 1999);
33. R.E. Grinter and M.A. Eldridge, 'Y do tngrs luv 2 txt msg?' in W. Prinz, M. Jarke, Y. Rogers, K. Schmidt and V. Wulf (eds), Proceedings of the Seventh European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2001), pp. 219-238;
34. G. Cosenza, 'I messaggi SMS' in C. Bazzanella (ed), Sul dialogo (Milano: Guerini, 2002).
35. In Norway 75 per cent of teens aged between 13 and 20 owned or had exclusive use of a mobile phone (R. Ling, Norwegian Teens, Mobile Telephony and SMS Use in School, Kjeller: Telenor R & D, 2000).
36. J.M. Kayani, C.E. Wotring and E.J. Forrets, 'Relational Control and Interactive Media Choice in Technology Mediated Communication', Human Communication Research, 22, no. 3 (1996), pp. 399-421.
37. W. Damon, 'The Nature of Socio-Cognitive Change in the Developing Child' in W.F. Overton (ed.), The Relationship between Social and Cognitive Development (Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1983), p. 103.
38. B. Rogoff, 'Introduction: Thinking and Learning in Social Context' in B. Rogoff and J. Lave (eds), Everyday Cognition: Its Development in Social Context (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1984), pp. 1-8;
39. J. Lave, Cognition in Practice (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1988).
40. C.U. Shantz, 'Social Cognition' in P.H. Mussen (ed.), Handbook of Child Psychology, vol. III: Cognitive Development (New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1983), p. 497.
41. J. Heritage, Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology (Cambridge: Polite Press, 1984).
42. E. Ochs, Culture and Language Development (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988);
43. D. Boden and D.H. Zimmerman (eds), Talk and Social Structure. Studies in Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis (Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1991);
44. C. Goodwin and A. Duranti, 'Rethinking Context: An Introduction' in A. Duranti and C. Goodwin (eds), Rethinking Context. Language as an Interactive Phenomenon (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992), pp. 1-42.
45. J. Potter and M. Wetherell, Discourse and Social Psychology: Beyond Attitudes and Behaviour (London: Sage, 1987).
46. R. Silverstone, E. Hirsch and D. Morley, 'Information and Communication Technologies and the Moral Economy of the Household' in R. Silverstone and E. Hirsch (eds), 1992, pp. 15-31.
47. P. Rabinow and M. Sullivan (eds), Interpretive Social Science: A Second Look (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1987).
48. C.L. Briggs, Learning How to Ask. A Sociolinguistic Appraisal of the Role of Interview in Social Science Research (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986);
49. E.G. Mishler, Research Interviewing: Context and Narratives (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986).
50. L. Palen, M. Salzman and E. Youngs, 'Going Wireless: Behaviour & Practice of New Mobile Phone Users' in D.G. Durand (ed), Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW 2000) (Philadelphia, New York: ACM Press, 2000), pp. 201-210.
51. E. Ochs, C. Taylor, D. Rudolph and R. Smith, 'Story-Telling as a Theory-Building Activity', Discourse Processes, 15 (1992), pp. 22-37; Jedlowsky, 2000.
52. J. Bruner, Actual Minds, Possible Worlds (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1986);
53. J. Bruner, Acts of Meaning (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1990).
54. E. Goffman, Forms of Talk (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1981).
55. M. Goodwin, He-Said-She-Said. Talk as Social Organization among Black Children (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1990), p. 229.
56. G. Marrone, C'era una volta il telefonino (Roma: Meltemi, 1999).
57. C. Bazzanella, 'Dialogic Repetition' in H. Loffler (ed), Dialoganalyse IV (Tubingen: Max Niemayer, 1993) pp. 285-294.
58. E. Schegloff, G. Jefferson and H. Sacks, 'The Preference for Self-Correction in the Organization of Repair in Conversation', Language, 53, no. 2 (1977), pp. 361-382.
59. D. Suess, A. Suoninen, et al., 'Media Use and the Relationships of Children and Teenagers with their Peer Groups: A Study of Finnish, Spanish and Swiss Cases', European Journal of Communication, 13, no. 4 (1998).
60. Whether a member of the group itself or of the research team, the interviewer's official role was to make participants engage in a topic-centred, focused discussion. It becomes easy to claim here that the discursive data are biased, i.e. they are created by the questions proposed by the interviewer. Adopting an ethnographic approach, it is hard to argue for biased conversational material insofar as every conversation is seen as a joint product of the people who participate. See N. Wolfson, 'Speech Events and Natural Speech: Some Implications for Sociolinguistic Methodology', Language in Society, 5 (1976), pp. 189-209;
61. W. Labov and D. Fanshell, Therapeutic Discourse. Psychotherapy as Conversation (New York: Academic Press, 1977); Briggs, 1986; Mishler, 1986; Caronia, 1997. From a conversation analysis point of view there is no 'spontaneous' discourse in a strict sense of the term and there is also no biased discourse insofar as the insertion of a topic in conversation is always a way to deviate, give new direction, and propose the speaker's candidate topic as the possible new relevant one. According to this theoretical frame work, the interviewers' efforts at topic managing are similar to what happens in naturally occurring conversations where and when someone engages in projecting the thematic flow of the talk.
62. This may be obvious in the case of the 'invited stories' (E.C. Cuff and D.W. Francis, 'Some Features of 'Invited Stories' about Marriage Breakdown', International Journal of Sociology of Language, 18 (1978), pp. 11-133) where one of the speakers proposes the scene and asks for some examples. But we also collected narratives in which the public location of the MP use was a topic created by the participants while linking their turns of talk to previous ones.
63. N. Quinn and D. Holland, 'Culture and Cognition' in D. Holland and N. Quinn (eds), 1987, pp. 3-42; D'Andrade and Strauss, 1992.
64. E. Goffman, Interaction Ritual (Garden City: Doubleday, 1967); Goffman, 1981.
65. P. Bourdieu, La distinction. Critique sociale du jugement (Paris: Minuit, 1979).
66. E.N. Goody (ed), Questions and Politeness: Strategies in Social Interaction (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1978);
67. P. Brown and S.S. Levinson, Politeness (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987).
68. B. Glaser and A. Strauss, The Discovery of Grounded Theory (Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1967).
69. M. Bakhtin, The Dialogic Imagination (Austin: University of Texas Press, 1981).
70. R. Ling, '"One can speaks about common manners!": the use of mobile telephones in inappropriate situations', Report 32/96, Telenor Research & Development (Oslo: 1996); Palen, Salzman and Youngs, 2000.
71. On linguistic, pragmatic features and politness concerns regarding email communication, see, among others, P. Violi, 'Electronic Dialogue Between Orality and Literacy: A Semiotic Approach' in Cmejrkovà et al. (eds), Dialogue in the Hearth of Europe (Tübingen: Niemeyer, 1998), pp. 263-270; Baron, 1999;
72. N. Baron, Alphabet to E-mail. How Written English Evolved and Where It's Heading (London: Routledge, 2000);
73. A. Garcea and C. Bazzanella, 'Discours rapporté et courrier électronique', Faits de langue, no. 1 (2002), pp. 233-246.
74. Goffman, 1967, 1981; A. Roversi, 'Introduzione all'edizione italiana' in N. Elias, La civiltà delle buone moniere (Bologna: Il Mulino, 1998), pp. IX-XIX.
75. M. Dallari, I testi dell'esserci (Torino: Il Segnalibro, 2000).
76. M. Dallari, Lo specchio e l'altro (Firenze: La Nuova Italia, 1990).
77. L. Balduzzi (ed), Le voci del corpo (Firenze: La Nuova Italia, 2002).
78. On gendered coping with the media, see D. Lemish, T. Liebes and V. Seidman, 'Gendered Media Meanings and Uses' in S. Livingstone and M. Bovill (eds), Children and Their Changing Media Environment (London: Erlbaum, 2001), pp. 263-282.
79. V. Zolberg, 'Taste as a Social Weapon' in Contemporary Sociology, 4 (1986), pp. 511-515.