Coronary artery imaging with dual-source CT: Initial experience

Chinese Journal of Radiology

Volumn 41, Issue 9, 2007, Pages 973-976

  Zhang, Zhu Hua ^a   Jin, Zheng Yu ^b   Zhang, Shu Yang ^b   Lin, Song Bai ^b   Li, Dong Jing ^b   Kong, Ling Yan ^b   Wang, Yi Ning ^b   Song, Lan ^b   Wang, Yun ^b   Zhao, Wen Min ^b   Wang, Lin Hui ^b   Zhang, Xiao Na ^b   Zhang, Yun Qing ^b   Qi, Bing ^b   Xu, Kai ^b   Liang, Ji Xiang ^b   Zhu, Hai Feng ^b   Mou, Wen Bin ^b   Zhang, Li Ren ^b   Zhu, Wen Ling ^b   Miao, Qi ^b   Fang, Qi ^b   more..

^a PEKING UNION MEDICAL COLLEGE HOSPITAL   (China)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Coronary heart disease; Tomography; X ray computed

Indexed keywords

CALCIUM; METOPROLOL;

ADULT; AGED; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; EXTRASYSTOLE; FEMALE; HEART ARRHYTHMIA; HEART RATE; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; ISCHEMIC HEART DISEASE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; SCREENING TEST;

EID: 35948991140     PISSN: 10051201     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Agatston AS, Janowitz WR, Hildner FJ, et al. Quantification of coronary artery calcium using ultrafast computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol, 1990, 15: 827-832.
2. Austen WG, Edwards JE, Frye RL, et al. A reporting system on patients evaluated for coronary artery disease: report of the Ad Hoc Committee for Grading of Coronary Artery Disease, council on cardiovascular surgery, American Heart Association. Circulation, 1975, 51: 5-40.
3. Achenbach S, Ropers D, Kuettner A, et al. Contrast-enhanced coronary artery visualization by dual-source computed tomography: initial experience. Eur J Radiol, 2006, 57: 331-335.
4. Hoffmann MH, Shi H, Manzke R, et al. Noninvasive coronary angiography with 16-detector row CT: effect of heart rate. Radiology, 2005,234: 86-97.
5. Leschka S, Wildermuth S, Boehm T, et al. Noninvasive coronary angiography with 64-section CT: effect of average heart rate and heart rate variability on image quality. Radiology, 2006, 241: 378-385.
6. Chinese source.
7. Ghersin E, Litmanovich D, Dragu R, et al. 16-MDCT coronary angiography versus invasive coronary angiography in acute chest pain syndrome: a blinded prospective study. AJR, 2006, 186: 177-184.
8. Pannu HK, Jacobs JE, Lai S, et al. Coronary CT angiography with 64-MDCT: assessment of vessel visibility. AJR,2006,187: 119-126.
9. Chinese source.
10. Chinese source.
11. Herzog C, Arning-Erb M, Zangos S, et al. Multi-detector row CT coronary angiography: influence of reconstruction technique and heart rate on image quality. Radiology,2006,238: 75-86.
12. Leschka S, Husmann L, Desbiolles LM, et al. Optimal image reconstruction intervals for non-invasive coronary angiography with 64-slice CT. Eur Radiol,2006,16:1964-1972.