The effectiveness of the municipal firms in providing the services;Efektivnost obecních obchodních společností při poskytování služeb

Politicka Ekonomie

Volumn 55, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 691-693

  Pavel, Jan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ECONOMICS   (Czech Republic)

Author keywords

Czech republic; Effectiveness; Municipal firms; Public procurement; Public services; Transparency

Indexed keywords

EID: 35948969191     PISSN: 00323233     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.18267/j.polek.619     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. BAJARI, P.; TADELIS, S. 2001. Incentives versus Transaction Costs: A Theory of Procuremet Contracts. Rand Journal of Economics. Autumn 2001, vol. 32, no. 3, s. 387-407.
2. BEBLAVÝ, M.; SIČÁKOVÁ-BEBLAVÁ, E. 2006. Inštitucionálne dilemy pri zabezpečení verejných služieb. 1. vyd. Bratislava: Transparency International Slovensko, 2006. 147 s. ISBN 80-89244-10-6.
3. BROWN, T. L.; POTOSKI, M. 2003. The Influence of Transactions Costs on Municipal and County Government Choices of Alternative Modes of Service Provision. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. 2003, vol. 13, no. 4, s. 441-468.
4. BUCHANAN, J. 1998. Veřejné finance v demokratickém systému. 1. vyd. Brno: Computer Press, 1998. 324 s. ISBN 80-7226-116-9.
5. BULOW, J.; KLEMPERER, P. 1996. Auction Versus Negotiations. American Economic Review. 1996, vol. 86, no. 1, s. 180-194.
6. DOMBERGER, S.; HALL, C.; LI, E. 1995. The Determinants of Price and Quality in Competitively Tendered Contracts. Economic Journal. 1995, vol. 105, no. 433, s. 1454-1470.
7. CHANDLER, T.; FEUILLE, P. 1991. Municipal Unions and Privatization. Public Administration Review. 1991, vol. 51, no. 1, s. 15-22.
8. INDUSTRY COMMISSION. 1996. Competitive Tendering and Contracting by Public Sector Agencies [Report No. 48]. Melbourne: Australian Government Publishing Service, 1996.
9. KIRZNER, I. 1998. Jak fungují trhy. 1. vyd. Praha: Liberální institut; Centrum liberálních studií; Megaprint, 1998, 90 s. ISBN 80-902270-5-8.
10. MILNE, R. G. 1997. Market-type Mechanisms, Market Testing and Market Making: A Longitudinal Study of Contractor Interest in Tendering. Urban Studies. 1997, vol. 34, no. 4, s. 543-559.
11. NEMEC, J.; MERIČKOVÁ, B.; VÍTEK, L. 2004. Contacting-out on Local Government Level. Transitional Economies: Theory and Selected Evidence from Czech and Slovak Republic. Příspěvek přednesený na konferenci The Eighth International Research Symposium on Public Management, Budapest, 2004.
12. OCHRANA, F. 2004. Veřejné zakázky. 1. vyd. Praha: Ekopress, 2004. 173 s. ISBN 80-86119-79-3.
13. OECD. 2002. Competition and efficiency in Publicly funded Services. Paris: OECD, 2002.
14. OECD. 2006. Roundtable on Concessions. Paris: OECD, 2006.
15. PAVEL, J. 2005. Velikost a transparentnost trhu veřejných zakázek v zemích OECD? Acta Facultatis Aerarii Publici. 2005, vol. 2, no. 1, s. 142-151.
16. PAVEL, J. 2006. Methods of selection of external suppliers of local public services and the impact of the quality of selection procedure on the effectiveness and efficiency of local public service provision in the Czech Republic. Příspěvek přednesený na konferenci Public Administration and Public Policy in Emerging Europe & Eurasia: For Professionalism, Impartiality and Transparency, Ljubjana, 2006. Dostupný z WWW: http://www.nispa.sk/_portal/page.php?sid=360.
17. PAVEL, J. 2006a. Efektivnost a transparentnost obecních obchodních společností. Praha: Transparency International - Česká republika, 2006. Dostupný z WWW: http://www.transparency.cz/pdf/vz_obecni_firmy_pavel.pdf.
18. SZYMANSKI, S. 1996. The Impact of Compulsory Competitive Tendering on Refuse Collection Services. Fiscal Studies. 1996, vol. 17, no. 3, s. 1-19.
19. WILLIAMSON, O. E. 1981. The Economics of Organization: The Transaction Cost Approach. The American Journal of Sociology. 1981, vol. 87, no. 3, s. 548-577.