Regulating against offence: Lessons from the field of UK advertising

Media, Culture and Society

Volumn 29, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 1036-1048

  Amy Chinn, Dee ^a  

^a OXFORD BROOKES UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 35948963676     PISSN: 01634437     EISSN: 14603675     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0163443707083828     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Advertising Standards Authority (1990) Herself Appraised. London: ASA.
2. Advertising Standards Authority (1990) Herself Reappraised: The Treatment of Women in Advertising. London: ASA.
3. Advertising Standards Authority (2001) How Far Can You Go? Advertising Standards Authority Annual Report 2000. London: ASA.
4. Advertising Standards Authority (2002 a) The Public's Perception of Advertising in Today's Society. London: ASA.
5. Advertising Standards Authority (2002 b) Serious O fence in Non-broadcast Advertising. London: ASA.
6. Advertising Standards Authority (2002 c) A Year in Review: Advertising Standards Authority Annual Report 2001. London: ASA.
7. Advertising Standards Authority (2003) We've Got it Covered: Advertising Standards Authority Annual Report 2002. London: ASA.
8. Advertising Standards Authority (2004) On the Move: Advertising Standards Authority Annual Report 2003. London: ASA.
9. Advertising Standards Authority (2005) Open for Business: Advertising Standards Authority Annual Report 2004. London: ASA.
10. Advertising Standards Authority (2006) Right for the Future: Advertising Standards Authority Annual Report 2005. London: ASA.
11. Amy-Chinn, Dee (2006) ' This is Just for Me(n): How the Regulation of Post-feminist Lingerie Advertising Perpetuates Woman as Object ', Journal of Consumer Culture 6 (2). 155 - 75.
12. Beattie, Trevor (2000) ' Murray Fails to see Genius of fcuk Idea ', Marketing Week, 14 December: 29.
13. Bignell, Jonathan (2002) Media Semiotics. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
14. Boddewyn, Jean (1991) ' Controlling Sex and Decency in Advertising around the World ', Journal of Advertising 20 (4). 25 - 35.
15. Brown, Beverley (1980) ' Private Faces in Public Places ', Ideology and Consciousness 7: 3 - 16.
16. Brvicevic, Martha and Gareth Kay (1998) Giving French Connection the F Factor. London: Institute of Practitioners in Advertising.
17. Amy-Chinn, Dee (2001) ' Sex Offence: The Cultural Politics of Perfume ', Women: A Cultural Review 12 (2). 164 - 75.
18. Committee of Advertising Practice (2003) The British Code of Advertising, Sales Promotion and Direct Marketing, 11 th edn. London: CAP.
19. Crozier, Keith and B. Zafer Erdogan (2001) ' Advertising Complainants: Who and Where Are They? ', Journal of Marketing Communications 7: 109 - 20.
20. Devlin, Patrick (1965) The Enforcement of Morals. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Friedan, Betty (1963) The Feminine Mystique. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
21. Gauntlett, David (1995) A Profile of Complainants and their Complaints. London: Broadcasting Standards Council.
22. Green, David P. (2006) We're (Nearly) All Victims Now! London: Civitas.
23. Hailstone, Susanne (1994) The Wonderbra - How Thinking Big Ensured the Survival of the Fittest. London: Institute of Practitioners in Advertising.
24. Hill, Annette (2000) ' The Language of Complaint ', Media, Culture & Society 22 (2). 233 - 6.
25. Hubbard, Phil (2002) ' Maintaining Family Values? Cleansing the Streets of Sex Advertising ', Area, 34 (4). 353 - 60.
26. Kirby, Terry (2006) ' No Charges for Advert which Blamed Homophobic Attacks on Religion ', The Independent, 29 September. URL (consulted November 2006). http://news.independent.co.uk/uk/legal/article1771851.ece
27. Kuhn, Annette (1984) ' Public versus Private: The Case of Obscenity and Indecency ', Leisure Studies 3 (1). 53 - 65.
28. Longford Committee (1972) Pornography: The Longford Report. London: Coronet.
29. Millwood Hargrave, Andrea (2000) Delete Expletives? London: ASA / BBC /BSC/ ITC.
30. Williamson, Judith (1978) Decoding Advertisements. London and New York: Marion Boyars.