Comparison of cephalometric norms between Japanese and Caucasian adults in antero-posterior and vertical dimension

European Journal of Orthodontics

Volumn 29, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 493-499

  Ioi, Hideki ^a   Nakata, Shunsuke ^a   Nakasima, Akihiko ^a   Counts, Amy L ^b  

^a KYUSHU UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b JACKSONVILLE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASIAN; CAUCASIAN; CEPHALOMETRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FACE; FEMALE; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; INCISOR; JAPAN; MALE; REFERENCE VALUE; REPRODUCIBILITY; STANDARD; STATISTICS; TOOTH ARCH; TOOTH OCCLUSION;

ADULT; ASIAN CONTINENTAL ANCESTRY GROUP; CEPHALOMETRY; DENTAL ARCH; EUROPEAN CONTINENTAL ANCESTRY GROUP; FACE; FEMALE; HUMANS; INCISOR; JAPAN; MALE; REFERENCE VALUES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; VERTICAL DIMENSION;

EID: 35948941895     PISSN: 01415387     EISSN: 14602210     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjm059     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Alcalde R, Jinno T, Orsini M G, Sasaki A, Sugiyama R M, Matsumura T 2000 Soft tissue cephalometric norms in Japanese adults. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 118: 84-89
2. Bishara S E, Hession T J, Peterson LC 1985 Longitudinal soft-tissue profile changes: a study of three analyses. American Journal of Orthodontics 88: 209-223
3. Broadbent B H 1931 A new X-ray technique and its application to orthodontia. Angle Orthodontist 1: 45-66
4. Burstone C J 1967 Lip posture and its significance in treatment planning. American Journal of Orthodontics 53:262-284
5. Burstone C J, Marcotte M R 2000 Problem solving in orthodontics. Quintessence, Publishing Co. Inc., Chicago
6. Christie T E 1977 Cephalometric patterns of adults with normal occlusion. Angle Orthodontist 47: 128-135
7. Downs W B 1948 Variation in facial relationships: their significance, treatment and prognosis. American Journal of Orthodontics 34: 812-840
8. Engel G, Spolter B M 1981 Cephalometric and visual norms for a Japanese population. American Journal of Orthodontics 80: 48-60
9. Hofrath H 1931 Bedeutung der röntgenfern und abstands aufnahme für die diagnostik der kieferanomalien. Fortschritte der Orthodontie 1: 231-258
10. Holdaway R A 1983 A soft-tissue cephalometric analysis and its use in orthodontic treatment planning. Part I. American Journal of Orthodontics 84: 1-28
11. Holdaway R A 1984 A soft-tissue cephalometric analysis and its use in orthodontic treatment planning. Part II. American Journal of Orthodontics 85: 279-293
12. Hulley S B, Cummings S R, Browner W S, Grady D, Hearst N, Newman T B 2001 Designing clinical research. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia
13. Ito K, Suematsu H 1967 Cephalometric study on the profile of Japanese young adult females with normal occlusion. Journal of Japan Orthodontic Society 26: 35-41 (in Japanese)
14. Iwasawa T, Moro T, Nakamura K 1977 Tweed triangle and soft-tissue consideration of Japanese with normal occlusion and good facial profile. American Journal of Orthodontics 72: 119-127
15. Izuka T, Ishikawa H 1957 Normal standards for various cephalometric analysis in Japanese adults. Journal of Japan Orthodontic Society 16: 4-12 (in Japanese)
16. Legan H L, Burstone C J 1980 Soft tissue cephalometric analysis for orthognathic surgery. Journal of Oral Surgery 38: 744-751
17. McNamara Jr J A 1984 A method of cephalometric evaluation. American Journal of Orthodontics 86: 449-169
18. Miura F, Inoue N, Suzuki K 1963 The standards of Steiner analysis for Japanese. Bulletin of Tokyo Medical and Dental University 10: 387-395
19. Miyajima K, McNamara Jr J A, Kimura T, Murata S, Iizuka T 1996 Craniofacial structure of Japanese and European-American adults with normal occlusions and well-balanced faces. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 110: 431-438
20. Nezu H, Nagata K, Yoshida Y, Kosaka H, Kikuchi M 1982 Cephalometric comparison of clinical norms between the Japanese and Caucasians. Journal of Japan Orthodontic Society 41:450-465 (in Japanese)
21. Proffit W R, Fields H W 2000 Contemporary orthodontics. Mosby, St Louis
22. Ricketts R M 1957 Planning treatment on the basis of the facial pattern and an estimate of its growth. Angle Orthodontist 27: 14-37.
23. Ricketts R M 1961 Cephalometric analysis and synthesis. Angle Orthodontist 31: 141-156
24. Riolo M L, Moyers R E, McNamara Jr J A, Hunter W S 1974 An atlas of craniofacial growth. Monograph No. 2, Craniofacial Growth Series. Center for Human Growth and Development, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
25. Sakamoto T 1959 A study on the development changes of dentofacial complex of Japanese with special reference to sella turcica. Journal of Japan Orthodontic Society 18:1-17 (in Japanese)
26. Shishikura K 1969 The study on measurements of hard and soft tissue by cephalograms - particularly on normal and Class I occlusion among Japanese adults. Journal of Japan Orthodontic Society 28: 263-273 (in Japanese)
27. Steiner CC 1953 Cephalometrics for you and me. American Journal of Orthodontics 39: 729-755
28. Tweed C H 1953 Evolutionary trends in orthodontics, past, present, and future. American Journal of Orthodontics 39: 81-108
29. Tweed C H 1954 The Frankfort-mandibular incisor angle (FMIA) in orthodontic diagnosis, treatment planning and prognosis. Angle Orthodontist 24:121-169
30. Uesato G, Kinoshita Z, Kawamoto T, Koyama I, Nakanishi Y 1978 Steiner cephalometric norms for Japanese and Japanese-Americans. American Journal of Orthodontics 73: 321-327
31. Yamauchi K 1959 Studies on 'beautiful face' of Japanese female adult: part 1, roentgenocephalometric analysis. Journal of Japan Orthodontic Society 18:18-20 (in Japanese)
32. Yamauchi K, Sakuda M 1959 Relationship between dental arch and craniofacial components: Japanese male adults with normal occlusions. Journal of Japan Orthodontic Society 18: 21-24 (in Japanese)
33. Yamauchi K, Ito K, Suematsu H, Ozeki S 1967 Sex difference of Japanese adult profile with normal occlusion on cephalometric roentgenograms. Journal of Japan Orthodontic Society 26: 155-160 (in Japanese)
34. Yogosawa F 1969 The relationship between dentoskeletal framework and soft tissue profile. Journal of Japan Orthodontic Society 28: 33-59 (in Japanese)