Model-based optimisation of the biological performance of a sidestream MBR

Water Science and Technology

Volumn 56, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 135-143

  Nopens, Ingmar ^a   Sin, G ^a   Jiang, T ^a   d'Antonio, L ^a   Stama, S ^a   Zhao, J ^a   Vanrolleghem, P A ^a,b  

^a GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

^b UNIVERSITÉ LAVAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

ASM2d; MBR; Modelling; Nutrient removal; Optimisation; Scenario analysis

Indexed keywords

CHEMICALS REMOVAL (WATER TREATMENT); EFFLUENTS; NITROGEN; NUTRIENTS; OPTIMIZATION; PHOSPHORUS; SEWAGE SLUDGE;

MEMBRANE BIOREACTOR; SCENARIO ANALYSIS;

BIOREACTORS;

AMMONIA; NITRATE; NITROGEN; OXYGEN; PHOSPHATE; PHOSPHORUS;

BIOREACTORS; CHEMICALS REMOVAL (WATER TREATMENT); EFFLUENTS; NITROGEN; NUTRIENTS; OPTIMIZATION; PHOSPHORUS; SEWAGE SLUDGE;

ACTIVATED SLUDGE; BIOREACTOR; EFFLUENT; MEMBRANE; MODELING; NITROGEN; OPTIMIZATION; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; PHOSPHORUS; REMOVAL EXPERIMENT;

AEROBIC REACTOR; ARTICLE; BIODEGRADABILITY; CALIBRATION; CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND; CONTROLLED STUDY; EFFLUENT; MEMBRANE REACTOR; METHODOLOGY; PROCESS OPTIMIZATION; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; SIMULATION; TIME;

BIOREACTORS; MODELS, THEORETICAL; NITROGEN; PHOSPHORUS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SEWAGE; WASTE DISPOSAL, FLUID; WATER PURIFICATION;

EID: 35948939781     PISSN: 02731223     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.2166/wst.2007.640     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Artan, N., Wilderer, P., Orhon, D., Tasli, R. and Morgenroth, E. (2002). Model evaluation and optimisation of nutrient removal potential for sequencing batch reactors. Wat. Sci. Tech., 28(4), 423-432.
2. Comas, J., Rodriguez-Roda, I., Poch, M., Gernaey, K.V., Rosen, C. and Jeppsson, U. (2006). Extension of the IWA/COST simulation benchmark to include expert reasoning for system performance evaluation. Wat. Sci.Tech., 53(4-5), 331-339.
3. Corominas, L., Sin, G., Pug, S., Traore, A., Balaguer, M., Colprim, J. and Vanrolleghem, P.A. (2006). Model-based evaluation of an on-line control strategy for SBRs based on OUR and ORP measurements. Wat. Sci. Tech., 53(4-5), 161-169.
4. Demuynck, C., Vanrolleghem, P.A., Mingneau, C., Liessens, J. and Verstraete, W. (1994). NDBEPR process optimisation in SBRs: Reduction of external carbon source and oxygen supply. Wat. Sci. Tech., 30(4), 169-179.
5. Henze, M., Gujer, W., Mino, T. and van Loosdrecht, M.C.M. (2000). Activated Sludge Models ASM1, ASM2, ASM2d and ASM3. IWA Scientific and Technical Report 9, IWA Publishing, London.
6. Hvala, N., Zec, M., Ros, M. and Strmcnik, S. (2001). Design of a sequencing batch reactor sequence with an input load partition in a simulation-based experimental environment. Water Env. Res., 73, 146-153.
7. Jiang, T., Liu, X., Kennedy, M.D., Schippers, J.C. and Vanrolleghem, P.A. (2005). Calibrating a side-stream membrane bioreactor using Activated Sludge Model No. 1. Wat. Sci. Tech., 52(10-11), 359-367.
8. Jiang, T., Sin, G., Spanjers, H., Nopens, I., Kennedy, M.D., van der Meer, W.G.J., Futselaar, H., Amy. G. and Vanrolleghem, P.A. (2007). Comparison of the activated sludge modelling approach between membrane bioreactor and conventional activated sludge processes. Wat. Res., (submitted).
9. Jiang, T. (2007). Characterisation and modelling of soluble microbial products in membrane bioreactors. PhD thesis, Ghent University, Belgium.
10. Sin, G., Insel, G., Lee, D. and Vanrolleghem, P.A. (2004). Optimal but robust N and P removal in SBRs: A model-based systematic study of operation scenarios. Wat. Sci. Tech, 50(10), 97-105.
11. Sin, G., Villez, K. and Vanrolleghem, P.A. (2006). Application of a model-based optimisation methodology for nutrient removing SBRs leads to falsification of the model. Wat. Sci.Tech, 53(4-5), 95-103.
12. Smolders, G.J.F., Klop, J.M., Van Loosdrecht, M.C.M. and Heijnen, J.J. (1995). A metabolic model of the biological phosphorus removal process; effect of the sludge retention time. Biotech. Bioeng, 48, 222-233.
13. Vanhooren, H., Meirlaen, J., Amerlinck, Y., Claeys, F., Vangheluwe, H. and Vanrolleghem, P.A. (2003). WEST: Modelling biological wastewater treatment. J. Hydroinformatics, 5, 27-50.