Authors should publish their raw data

International Urogynecology Journal

Volumn 18, Issue 12, 2007, Pages 1387-1390

  Nagelkerke, Nicolaas J D ^a   Bernsen, Roos M D ^a   Rizk, Diaa E E ^a  

^a UNITED ARAB EMIRATES UNIVERSITY   (United Arab Emirates)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCESS TO INFORMATION; CLINICAL DATA REPOSITORY; CLINICAL RESEARCH; DATA ANALYSIS; EDITORIAL; GYNECOLOGY; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MEDICAL LITERATURE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROFESSIONAL STANDARD; PUBLICATION; SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; SYSTEMATIC ERROR; UROLOGY; WRITING;

EID: 35948937671     PISSN: 09373462     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00192-007-0464-z     Document Type: Editorial

References (19)

1. Herbison P (2007) How to make your article more acceptable for the statistical reviewer. Neurourol Urodynam 26:318-322
2. U.S. Food and Drug Administration (2007) http://www.fda.gov/. Cited May 1, 2007
3. Kassirer JP, Campion EW (1994) Peer review: Crude and understudied, but indispensable. JAMA 272:96-97
4. LaFollette MC (1996) Stealing into print: Fraud, plagiarism, and misconduct in scientific publishing. University of California Press, Berkeley
5. Ioannidis JP (2005) Why most published research findings are false? PLoS Med 8:e124
6. Hartemink N, Boshuizen HC, Nagelkerke NJ, Jacobs MA, van Houwelingen HC (2006) Combining risk estimates from observational studies with different exposure cutpoints: A meta-analysis on body mass index and diabetes type 2. Am J Epidemiol 163:1042-1052
7. Lose G (2007) Urogynecological research: Current and future developments. Int Urogynecol J 18:599-601
8. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2007) http://www.cdc.gov/ nchs/nhanes.htm. Cited May 1, 2007
9. MEASURE DHS (2007) http://www.measuredhs.com/. Cited May 1, 2007
10. framingham.com (2007) http://www.framingham.com/heart/. Cited May 1, 2007
11. Levy D, Brink S (2005) A change of heart: How the people of framingham, massachusetts, helped unravel the mysteries of cardiovascular disease. Knopf, New York
12. Dietz HP (2007) Bias in research and conflict of interest: Why should we care? Int Urogynecol J 18:241-243
13. Lexchin J, Bero LA, Djulbegovic B, Clark O (2003) Pharmaceutical industry sponsorship and research outcome and quality: Systematic review. BMJ 326:1167-1170
14. Rizk DE (2007) Publication ethics: Science at its best and always informative. Int Urogynecol J 18(7):715-717
15. National Center for Biotechnology Information (2007) http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Genbank/index.html. Cited May 1, 2007
16. Swiss-Prot group (2007) http://expasy.org/people/swissprot.html. Cited May 1, 2007
17. Protein Information Resource (2007) http://pir.georgetown.edu/. Cited May 1, 2007
18. Altman DG, Cates C (2001) Authors should make their data available. BMJ 323:1069
19. Eysenbach G, Sa ER (2001) Code of conduct is needed for publishing raw data. BMJ 323:166