Effects of auditory feedback deprivation on non-native French vowels produced by children with cochlear implants

Audiological Medicine

Volumn 5, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 274-282

  Bharadwaj, Sneha V ^a   Katz, William F ^a   Tobey, Emily A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT DALLAS   (United States)

Author keywords

Auditory feedback; Children; Cochlear implants; French vowels; Speech production

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUDITORY SYSTEM; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCHOOL CHILD; SENSORY DEPRIVATION; SPEECH ANALYSIS; VOWEL;

EID: 35948937570     PISSN: 1651386X     EISSN: 16513835     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/16513860701705371     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Borden G. An interpretation of research on feedback interruption during speech. Brain Lang. 1979;7:302-19.
2. Zimmermann G, Rettaliata P. Articulatory patterns of an adventitiously deaf speaker: implications for the role of auditory information in speech production. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1981;24:169-78.
3. Cowie R, Douglas-Cowie E. Speech in postlingual deafness. In: Lutman M, Haggard MP, editors. Hearing science and hearing disorders. Washington (DC): Gallaudet Research Institute; 1983a. p. 172-88.
4. Perkell J, Matthies M, Lane H, Guenther F, Wilhelm-Tricarico R, Wozniak J, Guiod P. Speech motor control: acoustic goals, saturation effects, auditory feedback and internal models. Speech Comm. 1997;22:227-50.
5. Perkell J, Guenther FH, Lane H, Matthies M, Perrier P, Vick J, et al. A theory of speech motor control and supporting data from speakers with normal hearing and with profound hearing loss. J Phon. 2000;28:233-72.
6. Kawato M. Internal models for motor control and trajectory planning. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 1999;9:718-27.
7. Callan DE, Kent RD, Guenther FH, Vorperian HK. An auditory-feedback-based neural network model of speech production that is robust to developmental changes in the size and shape of the articulatory system. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2000;43:721-36.
8. Svirsky MA, Jones D, Osberger MJ, Miyamoto RT. The effect of auditory feedback on the control of oral-nasal balance by pediatric cochlear implant users. Ear Hear. 1998;19:385-93.
9. Higgins MB, McCleary EA, Schulte L. Altered phonatory physiology with short-term deactivation of children's cochlear implants. Ear Hear. 1999;20:426-38.
10. Tobey EA, Gray R, Simpson A, Gabbert G, Guravitch S, Kunkel F. Temporal characteristics of speech in young French-speaking children with cochlear implants. In: Waltzman SB, Cohen NL, editors. Cochlear Implants. New York (NY): Thieme; 2000. p. 314-5.
11. Svirsky MA, Tobey EA. Effect of different types of auditory stimulation on vowel formant frequencies in multichannel cochlear implant users. J Acoust Soc Am. 1991;89:2895-904.
12. Perkell JS, Lane H, Svirsky MA, Webster J. Speech of cochlear implant patients: a longitudinal study of vowel production. J Acoust Soc Am. 1992;91:2961-79.
13. Bharadwaj SV, Tobey EA, Assmann PF, Katz WF. Effects of auditory feedback on fricatives produced by cochlear implanted adults and children: acoustic and perceptual evidence. J Acoust Soc Am. 2006;119:1626-35.
14. Bharadwaj SV, Graves AG, Bauer DD, Assmann PF. Effects of auditory feedback deprivation length on the vowel/eh/produced by pediatric cochlear implant users. J Acoust Soc Am. 2007;121:196-202.
15. Svirsky MA, Lane H, Perkell JS, Wozniak J. Effects of short-term deprivation on speech production in adult cochlear implant users. J Acoust Soc Am. 1992;92:1284-300.
16. Richardson LM, Busby PA, Blamey PJ, Dowell RC, Clark GM. The effects of auditory feedback from the Nucleus cochlear implant on the vowel formant frequencies produced by children and adults. Ear Hear. 1993;14:339-49.
17. Krause JC, Braida LD. Acoustic properties of naturally produced clear speech at normal speaking rates. J Acoust Soc Am. 2004;115:362-78.
18. Fougeron C Smith CL (1999). Handbook of the International Phonetic Association. Cambridge, UK: University Press. 1999. p. 78-81.
19. Assmann PF, Ballard W, Bornstein L, Paschall DD. Track-Draw: a graphical interface for controlling the parameters of a speech synthesizer. Behav Res Methods. 1994;26:431-6.
20. Kawahara H, Masuda-Katsuse I, de Cheveigne A. Restructuring speech representations using pitch adaptive time-frequency smoothing and an instantaneous-frequency based F0 extraction: possible role of a repetitive structure in sounds. Speech Comm. 1999;27:187-207.
21. Goberman AM, Elmer LW. Acoustic analysis of clear versus conversational speech in individuals with Parkinson's disease. J Commun Disord. 2005;38:215-30.
22. Flege JE. Production and perception of a novel, second-language phonetic contrast. J Acoust Soc Am. 1993;93:1589-608.
23. Nosofsky RM. Attention, similarity, and the identification-categorization relationship. J Exp Psych Gen. 1986;115:39-57.
24. Kingston J. Learning foreign vowels. Lang Speech. 2003;46:295-349.