Déterminisme et conséquences écologiques de la dynamique invasive du Cerisier tardif (Prunus serotina Ehrh.) sur les communautés végétales de la forêt de Compiègne

Acta Botanica Gallica

Volumn 154, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 383-394

  Chabrerie, Olivier ^a   Hoeblich, Hélène ^a   Decocq, Guillaume ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE PICARDIE JULES VERNE   (France)

Author keywords

Biodiversity; Biological invasion; Disturbance; Forest; Management; Plant community

Indexed keywords

PRUNUS; PRUNUS SEROTINA;

EID: 35948933460     PISSN: 12538078     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/12538078.2007.10516071     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Braun-Blanquet, J., 1964. Pflanzensoziologie Grünzüge der Vegetationsgrunde. Springer, Berlin 865
2. Cannas, S. A., Paez, S. A., and Marco, D. E., 1999. “ Modelling plant spread in forest ecology using cellular automata. ”. In Computer Physics Communications, 121–122 131–135.
3. Chabrerie, O., Sebert, E., and Decocq, G., 2004. “ Invasive dynamic of Prunus serotina Ehrh. in forest ecosystems:spatial analysis, ecological response of plant communities, mathematical modelling and sociological approach. In:First Prunus serotina ”. In Contact group meeting. Edited by:Verheyen, K., 23Bruxelles, Belgium:Université libre de Bruxelles (ULB).
4. Closset-Kopp, D., Chabrerie, O., and Decocq, G., J. Ecol. submitted.- When Oskar meets Alice:lack of trade-off in r/K-stra- tegies makes Prunus serotina Ehrh. a successful invader of European forests
5. Costello, D. A., Lunt, I. D., and Williams, J. E., 2000. Effects of invasion by the indigenous shrub Acacia sophorae on plant composition of coastal grasslands in south-eastern Australia. Biol. Conserv., 96 (1):113–121.
6. e année de l'ENITEF, Office national des forêts, Compiègne, France 63
7. Decocq, G., 2003. Prunus serotina, ministère de l'Ecologie et du Développement durable, Université de Picardie Jules Verne 38 Dynamique invasive du cerisier tardif, Prunus serotina Ehrh., en système forestier tempéré:déterminants, mécanismes, impacts écologiques, économiques et socio-anthropologiques. Rapport intermédiaire du programme INVABIO II
8. Dufrêne, M., and Legendre, P., 1997. Species assemblages and indicator species:the need for a flexible asymmetrical approach. Ecol. Monogr., 67:345–366.
9. Dukes, J. S., and Mooney, H. A., 1999. Does global change increase the success of biological invaders?. Trends Ecol. Evol., 14 (4):135–139.
10. Higgins, S. I., and Richardson, D. M., 1996. A review of models of alien plant spread. Ecol. Model., 87 (1–3):249–265.
11. Hill, M. O., 1973. Reciprocal averaging:an eigenvector method of ordination. J. Ecol., 61:237–249.
12. Lambinon, J., De Langhe, J. E., Delvosalle, L., and Duvigneaud, J., 1999. Nouvelle flore de la Belgique, du Grand-Duché de Luxembourg, du Nord de la France et des régions voisines. Jardin botanique national de Belgique, Meise, Belgium, 1 092
13. Loreau, M., 2005. “ Paris declaration on biodiversity. In:International Conference ”. In “Biodiversity:science and governance”. Ministère délégué À la recherche (ed.) 3Paris:UNESCO.
14. McCune, B., and Mefford, M. J., 1999. PC-ORD. Multivariate analysis of ecological data, version 4. M.S. Design, Gleneden Beach, Oregon, USA 238
15. ONF. 1995. Forêt domaniale de Compiègne, révision d'aménagement forestier 1996–2010. Office national des forêts, Direction nationale de Picardie, Division de Compiègne, Compiègne, France 86
16. Pitelka, L. F., 1997. Plant migration and climate change. Amer., 85 (5):464–473. Sci.
17. Roux, M., 1991. “ Basic procedures in hierarchical cluster analysis. ”. In Applied Multivariate Analysis in SAR and Environmental studies. Edited by:Devillers, J., and Karcher, W., 115–136. Dordrecht, The Netherlands:Kluwer Academic Publishers.
18. Sartori, F., 1985. Coll. Phytosoc., XIV:185–203. Prunus serotina Ehrh. en Italie., Phytosociologie et foresterie
19. Silvertown, J. W., 1982. Introduction to plant population ecology., Longman, London 209
20. Starfinger, U., 1997. “ Introduction and naturalization of Prunus serotina in central Europe. ”. In Plant invasions:studies from North America and Europe. Edited by:Brock, J. H., Wade, M., Pysek, P., and Green, D., 161–171. Leiden:Backhuys.
21. Starfinger, U., Kowarik, I., Rode, M., and Schepker, H., 2003. From desirable ornamental plant to pest to accepted addition to the flora? The perception of an alien plant species through the centuries. Biol. Invasions, 5:323–335.
22. Thioulouse, J., Chessel, D., Doledec, S., and Olivier, J. M., 1997. ADE-4:a multivariate analysis and graphical display software. Stat. Comput., 7:75–83.
23. Uchytil, R. J., 1991. “ Fire effects information system. Index of species information ”. In Prunus serotina, United States Department of Agriculture, Forest service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire sciences L a b o r a t o r y http://www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/plants/tree/pruser/Access:28/09/2004, Last update:2004, April 7
24. Ward, J. H., 1963. Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function. J. Amer. Stat., 58:238–244.