Relationships among measures as empirical evidence of validity: Incorporating multiple indicators of achievement and school context

Educational Assessment

Volumn 12, Issue 3-4, 2007, Pages 239-266

  Goldschmidt, Pete ^a,b   Martinez, Jose Felipe ^b   Niemi, David ^b   Baker, Eva L ^b  

^a CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 35948929116     PISSN: 10627197     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (14)

1. Aitkin, M., & Longford, N. (1986). Statistical modeling issues in School Effectiveness Studies. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, A, 149(1), 1-43.
2. American Psychological Association, American Educational Research Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education. (1999). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
3. Burstein, L. (1980). The analysis of multilevel data in educational research and evaluation. In D. C. Berliner (Ed.), Review of research in education (Vol. 8, pp. 158-233). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
4. Kleinbaum, D. (1994). Logistic regression: A self-learning text. New York: Springer-Verlag.
5. Linn, R. L., Baker, E. L., & Dunbar, S. B. (1991). Complex, performance-based assessment: Expectations and validation criteria. Educational Researcher, 20(8), 15-21.
6. Martinez-Fernandez, J. F. (2005). A multilevel study of the effects of opportunity to learn (OTL) on student reading achievement: Issues of measurement, equity, and validity (Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles). Dissertation Abstracts International DAI-A 65/11, 3155006.
7. Martinez-Fernandez, J. F., & Goldschmidt, P. (2003). LAUSD Language Arts Performance Assignments: Generalizability studies of central ratings (Final report). Los Angeles: University of California, Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing.
8. Messick, S. (1989). Validity. In R. L. Linn (Ed.), Educational measurement (3rd ed., pp. 13-103). New York: American Council on Education/Macmillan.
9. Messick, S. (1994). The interplay of evidence and consequences in the validation of performance assessments. Educational Researcher, 23(2), 13-23.
10. Messick, S. (1996). Validity of performance assessment. In G. Phillips (Ed.), Technical issues in large-scale performance assessment (pp. 1-18). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
11. National Research Council. (2001). Knowing what students know: The science and design of educational assessments. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
12. Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
13. Solmon, L. C., & Goldschmidt, P. (2004). Comparing traditional public schools and charter schools on retention, school switching, and achievement growth (Policy Rep. No. 192). Phoenix, AZ: Goldwater Institute.
14. Worthen, B. R., White, K. R., Fan, X., & Sudweeks, R. R. (1999). Measurement and assessment in schools (2nd ed.). New York: Longman.