The processing consequences of the imperfective paradox

Journal of Semantics

Volumn 24, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 307-330

  Baggio, Giosuè ^a   Van lambalgen, Michiel ^b  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 35848970365     PISSN: 01675133     EISSN: 14774593     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/jos/ffm005     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Andrade-Lotero, E. (2006), Meaning and Form in Event Calculus. Unpublished Master's thesis, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
2. Baayen, R., R. Piepenbrock, & L. Gulikers (1996), CELEX2. Linguistic Data Consortium. Philadelphia.
3. Clark, H. (1973), 'The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy: A critique of language statistics in psychological research'. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 12:335-59.
4. Cook, A., J. Limber, & E. O'Brien (2001), 'Situation-based context and the availability of predictive inference'. Journal of Memory and Language 44:220-34.
5. de Swart, H. (1998), 'Aspect shift and coercion'. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 16:347-85.
6. Doets, K. (1994), From Logic to Logic Programming. MIT Press. Cambridge, MA.
7. Dowty, D. (1979), Word Meaning and Montague Grammar. Reidel. Dordrecht.
8. Frank, S., M. Koppen, L. Noordman, & W. Vonk (2003), 'Modeling knowledge-based inferences in story comprehension'. Cognitive Science 27:875-910.
9. Frazier, L. (1987), 'Sentence processing: A tutorial review'. In M. Coltheart (ed.), Attention and Performance, Volume XII. Erlbaum Press. Hillsdale, 559-586.
10. Friederici, A. (2002), 'Towards a neural basis of auditory sentence processing'. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 6:78-84.
11. Geurts, B., & F. van der Slik (2005), 'Monotonicity and processing load'. Journal of Semantics 22:97-117.
12. Goldberg, A. (1995), Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. University of Chicago Press. Chicago.
13. Hagoort, P. (2006), 'The Memory, Unification, and Control (MUC) model of language'. In A. Meyer, L. Wheeldon, and A. Krott (eds.), Automaticity and Control in Language Proccssing. Psychology Press. Philaldelphia, 243-270.
14. Hagoort, P., & C. Brown (1994), 'Brain responses to lexical ambiguity resolution and parsing'. In C. Clifton, L. Frazier, and K. Rayner (eds.), Perspectives on Sentence Processing. Lawrence Erlbaum. Hillsdale, 45-81.
15. Hagoort, P, L. Hald, M. Bastiaansen, & K. Petersson (2004), 'Integration of word meaning and world knowledge in language comprehension'. Science 304:438-41.
16. Hamm, F., & M. van Lambalgen (2003), 'Event calculus, nominalisation and the progressive'. Linguistics and Philosophy 26:381-458.
17. Hitzler, P., S. Hölldobler, & A. Seda (2004), 'Logic programs and connectionist networks'. Journal of Applied Logic 3:245-72.
18. Hornik, K., M. Stinchcombe, & H. White (1989), 'Multilayer feedforward networks are universal approximators'. Neural Networks 2 359-66.
19. Jackendoff, R. (2002), Foundations of Language: Brain, Meaning, Grammar, Evolution. Oxford University Press. Oxford.
20. Kamp, H. (1981), 'A theory of truth and semantic representation'. In J. Groenendijk, T. Janssen, and M. Stokhof (eds.), Formal Methods in the Study of Language. Amsterdam Mathematical Centre. Amsterdam.
21. Kutas, M., & S. Hillyard (1980), 'Reading senseless sentences: Brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity'. Science 207:203-5.
22. Kutas, M., & S. Hillyard (1984), 'Brain potentials during reading reflect word expectancy and semantic association'. Nature 307 161-3.
23. Landman, F. (1992), 'The progressive'. Natural Language Semantics 1:1-32.
24. Levelt, W. (1990), 'Are multilayer feed-forward networks effectively turing machines?' Psychological Research 52:153-7.
25. Luck, S. (2005), An Introduction to the Event-Related Potential Technique. MIT Press. Cambridge, MA.
26. Mart, D. (1982), Vision: A Computational Investigation into the Human Representation and Proccssing of Visual Information. Freeman. San Francisco.
27. Marr, D., & T. Poggio (1976), 'From understanding computation to understanding neural circuitry'. MIT AI Memos 357:1-22.
28. Marslen-Wilson, W. (1989), 'Access and integration: Projecting sound onto meaning'. In W. Marslen-Wilson (ed.), Lexical Representation and Process. The MIT Press. Cambridge, MA, 3-24.
29. McCulloch, W., & E. Pitts (1943), 'A logical calculus of the ideas immanent in nervous activity'. Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics 5:115-33.
30. McMillan, C., R. Clark, P. Moore, C. Devita, & M. Grossman (2005), 'Neural basis of generalized quantifier comprehension'. Neuropsychologia 43:1729-37.
31. McMillan, C., R. Clark, P. Moore, & M. Grossman (2006), 'Quantifier comprehension in corticobasal degeneration'. Brain and Cognition 62:250-60.
32. Michaelis, L. (2001), A Unification-Based Model of Aspectual Type-Shifting. University of Colorado at Boulder.
33. Minsky, M. (1977), 'Frame-system theory'. In P. Johnson-Laird and P. Watson (eds.), Thinking. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge, 104-116.
34. Parsons, T. (1990), Events in the Semantics of English. MIT Press. Cambridge, MA.
35. Petersson, K. (2005), 'On the relevance of the neurobiological analogue of the finite-state architecture'. Neurocomputing 65-66 825-32.
36. Reichenbach, H. (1947), Elements of Symbolic Logic. Macmillan. New York.
37. Rojas, R. (1996), Neural Networks: A Systematic Introduction. Springer. Berlin, New-York.
38. Rosenblatt, F. (1962), Principles of Neurodynamics: Perceptrons and the Theory of Brain Mechanisms. Spartan Books. New York.
39. Rothstein, S. (2004), Structuring Events. Blackwell. Oxford.
40. Schäfer, A., & H. Zimmermann (2006), 'Recurrent neural networks are universal approximators'. In S. Kollias, A. Stafylopatis, W. Duch, and E. Oja (eds.), Artificial Neural Networks ICANN 2006. Springer. Berlin, New York, 632-640.
41. Schank, R., & R. Abelson (1977), Scripts, Plans, Goals and Understanding. Lawrence Erlbaum. Hillsdale.
42. Stenning, K., & M. van Lambalgen (2005), 'Semantic interpretation as computation in nonmonotonic logic: The real meaning of the suppression task'. Cognitite Science 29: 919-60.
43. Stenning, K., & M. van Lambalgen (2007), Human Reasoning and Cognitive Science. MIT Press. Cambridge, MA.
44. van Berkum, J., P. Hagoort, & C. Brown (1999), 'Semantic integration in sentences and discourse: Evidence from the N400'. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 11:657-71.
45. van Berkum, J., P. Zwitserlood, P. Hagoort, & C. Brown (2003), 'When and how do listeners relate a sentence to the wider discourse? Evidence from the N400 effect'. Cognitive Brain Rescarch 17:701-18.
46. van der Velde, F. (1993), 'Is the brain an effective turing machine or a finite-state machine?' Psychological Research 55:71-9.
47. van Dijk, T. (1980), Macrostructures. Lawrence Erlbaum. Hillsdale.
48. van Lambalgen, M., & F. Hamm (2004), The Proper Treatment of Events Blackwell. Oxford.
49. Vendler, Z. (1957), 'Verbs and times'. The Philosophical Review 66: 143-60.
50. Wike, E., & J. Church (1976), 'Comments on Clark's "The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy"'. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 14: 249-55.