Five hypotheses concerning the fate of the Singapore issues in the Doha Round

Oxford Review of Economic Policy

Volumn 23, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 392-414

  Evenett, Simon J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ST GALLEN   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Doha Round; Singapore issues; WTO

Indexed keywords

MULTILATERAL TRADE; TRADE AGREEMENT; WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION;

ASIA; EURASIA; SINGAPORE [SOUTHEAST ASIA]; SOUTHEAST ASIA;

EID: 35848959087     PISSN: 0266903X     EISSN: 14602121     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/oxrep/grm025     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Ahmed, N. (2003), 'Cancún And Aftermath', Ministry of Commerce, Bangladesh.
2. Deardorff, A. V., and Stern, R. M. (1998), Measurement of Non-tariff Barriers, Ann Arbor, MI, University of Michigan Press.
3. Evenett, S. J. (2003a), 'A Study on Issues Relating to a Possible Multilateral Framework on Competition Policy', prepared for the World Trade Organization's Secretariat.
4. Evenett, S. J. (2003b), 'The Failure of the WTO Ministerial Meeting in Cancún: What Implications for Future Research on the World Trading System?', CESIfo Forum, Autumn, 1-17.
5. Evenett, S. J. (2007), 'EU Commercial Policy in a Multipolar Trading System', Review of European Economic Policy/Intereconomics, 42 3), 143-55.
6. Hoekman, B. M. (2005), 'Government Procurement: Market Access, Transparency and Multilateral Trade Rules', European Journal of Political Economy, 21(1), 163-83.
7. Federal Trust (2003), 'Expanding WTO Rules? Should there be WTO Rules on Competition, Investment, Trade Facilitation, and Transparency in Government Procurement?', 5 June, London, Federal Trust for Education and Research.
8. Finger, J. M. (2007), 'Implementation and Imbalance: Dealing with Hangover from the Uruguay Round', Oxford Review of Economic Policy 23(3), 440-60.
9. Hoekman, B. M. (2003), 'Cancún: Crisis or Catharsis?', note circulated at the Brookings-George Washington Trade Roundtable, 17 September.
10. Hoekman, B. M. Newfarmer, R. (2003), 'After Cancún: Continuation or Collapse?', Trade Note, International Trade Department, Washington, DC, World Bank, 17 December.
11. Ismail, F. (2005), 'A Development Perspective on the WTO July 2005 General Council Decision', Journal of International Economic Law, 8(2), 377-402.
12. Khor, M. (2003), 'An Analysis of the WTO's Fifth Ministerial Conference (Cancún, 10-14 September 2003)', Third World Network.
13. Kol, J., and Winters, L. A. (2004), 'The EU after Cancún: Can the Leopard Change its Spots?', European Foreign Affairs Review, 9 1-25.
14. Lamy, P. (2003), 'Commissioner Lamy's Speech at the EP - Result on the WTO Ministerial Conference in Cancún', 24 September.
15. Lamy, P. (2004), 'Europe and the Future of Economic Governance', Journal of Common Market Studies, 42(1), 5-21.
16. Lawrence, R. Z. (2006), 'Rulemaking Amidst Growing Diversity: A Club-of-Clubs Approach to WTO Reform and New Issue Selection', Journal of International Economic Law, 9(4), 823-35.
17. Lloyd, P. (2005), 'When should New Areas be Added to the WTO?', World Trade Review, 4(2), 273-93.
18. Maskus, K. E. (2002), 'Regulatory Standards in the WTO: Comparing Intellectual Property Rights with Competition Policy, Environmental Protection, and Core Labour Standards', World Trade Review, 1 2), 135-52.
19. Sandrey, R. (2006), 'WTO and the Singapore Issues', Tralac Working Paper No. 18/2006, November.
20. SECO and Evenett, S. J. (eds) (2003), The Singapore Issues and the World Trading System: The Road to Cancún and Beyond, Swiss State Secretariat for Economic Affairs, June.
21. White & Case (2003), 'WTO Talks Collapse in Cancún: A Splash of Cold Water, or Dead in the Water?', Special Report on the WTO Cancún Ministerial, No. 6, 16 September, New York, White & Case LLP.
22. Wolfe, R. (2007), 'Can the Trading System be Governed? Institutional Implications of the WTO's Suspended Animation', forthcoming as a Centre for International Governance Innovation Working Paper, Waterloo, Canada, 24 May.
23. Woolcock, S. (2003), 'The Singapore Issues in Cancún: A Failed Negotiation Ploy or a Litmus Test for Global Governance?', Review of European Economic Policy/Intereconomics, 38(5), 249-55.