Fraud and deceit in published medical research

Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand

Volumn 90, Issue 10, 2007, Pages 2238-2243

  Lohsiriwat, Varut ^a   Lohsiriwat, Supatra ^a  

^a MAHIDOL UNIVERSITY   (Thailand)

Author keywords

Medical research publication; Research ethics

Indexed keywords

ATTITUDE TO CHANGE; BIOETHICS; FORGERY; HARM REDUCTION; HONESTY; MEDICAL AUDIT; MEDICAL ETHICS; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PEER REVIEW; PRIMARY PREVENTION; PROFESSIONAL MISCONDUCT; PROFESSIONALISM; PUBLICATION; RESEARCH ETHICS; REVIEW; RISK REDUCTION; SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT;

ETHICS, RESEARCH; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; HUMANS; PUBLISHING; SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT;

EID: 35848947027     PISSN: 01252208     EISSN: 01252208     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (18)

1. Claxton LD. Scientific authorship. Part 1. A window into scientific fraud? Mutat Res 2005; 589: 17-30.
2. Th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2000.
3. Bostanci A. Research ethics. Germany gets in step with scientific misconduct rules. Science 2002; 296: 1778.
4. DeMets DL. Distinctions between fraud, bias, errors, misunderstanding, and incompetence. Control Clin Trials 1997; 18: 637-50.
5. Bonetta L. The aftermath of scientific fraud. Cell 2006; 124: 873-5.
6. Ranstam J, Buyse M, George SL, Evans S, Geller NL, Scherrer B, et al. Fraud in medical research: an international survey of biostatisticians. ISCB Subcommittee on Fraud. Control Clin Trials 2000; 21: 415-27.
7. Snyder EY, Loring JF. Beyond fraud - stem-cell research continues. N Engl J Med 2006; 354: 321-4.
8. Cho MK, McGee G, Magnus D. Research conduct. Lessons of the stem cell scandal. Science 2006; 311: 614-5.
9. Ngai S, Gold JL, Gill SS, Rochon PA. Haunted manuscripts: ghost authorship in the medical literature. Account Res 2005; 12: 103-14.
10. Farthing MJ. Retractions in Gut 10 years after publication. Gut 2001; 48: 285-6.
11. White C. Suspected research fraud: difficulties of getting at the truth. BMJ 2005; 331: 281-8.
12. Weiss RB, Gill GG, Hudis CA. An on-site audit of the South African trial of high-dose chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer and associated publications. J Clin Oncol 2001; 19: 2771-7.
13. Rhodes R, Strain JJ. Whistleblowing in academic medicine. J Med Ethics 2004; 30: 35-9.
14. Sox HC, Rennie D. Research misconduct, retraction, and cleansing the medical literature: lessons from the Poehlman case. Ann Intern Med 2006; 144: 609-13.
15. Kjeldsen SE, Narkiewicz K, Cifkova R, Mancia G. ESH statement on detection and punishment of abstract fraud and poster plagiarism. Blood Press 2005; 14: 322-3.
16. Surgical Journal Editors Group. Consensus statement on surgery journal authorship - 2006. Surgery 2006; 139: 11A-2A.
17. Norman C. Reduce fraud in seven easy steps. Science 1984; 224: 581.
18. Bennett J, Collins J. The relationship between physicians and the biomedical industries: advice from the Royal College of Physicians. Clin Med 2002; 2: 320-2.