Value of the promontory stimulation test in predicting speech perception after cochlear implantation

Laryngoscope

Volumn 117, Issue 11, 2007, Pages 1988-1992

  Lee, Jong Cheol ^a   Yoo, Myung Hoon ^a   Ahn, Joong Ho ^a   Lee, Kwang Sun ^a,b  

^a University of Ulsan College of Medicine   (South Korea)

^b Asan Medical Center   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Cochlear implantation; Promontory stimulation test; Speech perception

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; FEMALE; FUNCTION TEST; HEARING DISORDER; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL RECORD; NERVE STIMULATION; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGNOSIS; PROMONTORY STIMULATION TEST; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SCORING SYSTEM; SPEECH PERCEPTION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; COCHLEAR IMPLANTS; DEAFNESS; ELECTRIC STIMULATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SPEECH PERCEPTION; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC;

EID: 35848944861     PISSN: 0023852X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/MLG.0b013e31813437e6     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Cohen NL, Waltzman SB, Fisher SG. A prospective, randomized study of cochlear implants: the Department of Veterans Affairs Cochlear Implant Study Group. N Engl J Med 1993;328:233-237.
2. Cheng AK, Rubin HR, Powe NR, Mellon NK, Francis HW, Niparko JK. Cost-utility analysis of the cochlear implant in children. JAMA 2000;284:850-856.
3. Wackym PA, Firszt JB, Runge-Samuelson CL. Patient evaluation and device selection for cochlear implantation. In: Cummings CW, Flint PW, Harker LA, et al, eds. Cummings Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, ed 4. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier Mosby; 2005;3603-3636.
4. House WF, Brackmann DE. Electrical promontory testing in differential diagnosis of sensorineural hearing impairment. Laryngoscope 1974;84:2162-2171.
5. House WF, Berliner KI. Safety and efficacy of the House/SM cochlear implant in profoundly deaf adults. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 1986;11:275-286.
6. Pyman BC, Gordon M, Clark GM, Brown AM, Dowell RC, Hollow RD. Factors predicting postoperative sentence scores in postlinguistically deaf adult cochlear implant patients. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1992;101:342-348.
7. Kileny PR, Zimmerman-Phillips S, Kemink JL, Schmaltz SP. Effects of preoperative electrical stimulability and historical factors on performance with multichannel implant. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1991;100:563-568.
8. Sugiyama N, Doi K, Iwaki T, Yamamoto K, Kawashima T, Kubo T. The prognostic value of preoperative promontory testing in Japanese cochlear implant patients [Abstract]. Nippon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho 1999;102:853-857.
9. Kuo SC, Gibson WP. The role of the promontory stimulation test in cochlear implantation. Cochlear Implants Int 2002;3:19-28.
10. Friedland DR, Venick HS, Niparko JK. Choice of ear for cochlear implantation: the effect of history and residual hearing on predicted postoperative performance. Otol Neurotol 2003;24:582-589.
11. Mortensen MV, Madsen S, Gjedde A. Use of time differences in normal hearing - cortical processing of promontorial stimuli. Hear Res 2005;205:94-101.
12. Mortensen MV, Madsen S, Gjedde A. Cortical responses to promontorial stimulation in postlingual deafness. Hear Res 2005;209:32-41.