Cochlear implant outcomes and quality of life in adults with prelingual deafness

Laryngoscope

Volumn 117, Issue 11, 2007, Pages 1982-1987

  Klop, W Martin C ^a   Briaire, Jeroen J ^a   Stiggelbout, Anne M ^a   Frijns, Johan H M ^a  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Cochlear implantation; Predictive factors; Prelingually deafened adult; Quality of life; Speech perception

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; CONSONANT; FEMALE; HEARING; HEARING IMPAIRMENT; HUMAN; INTERVENTION STUDY; MALE; PHONEME; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGNOSIS; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; SCORING SYSTEM; SPEECH PERCEPTION; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE; VOWEL;

ADULT; COCHLEAR IMPLANTS; DEAFNESS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; QUALITY OF LIFE; REHABILITATION OF HEARING IMPAIRED; SPEECH PERCEPTION; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 35848930768     PISSN: 0023852X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/MLG.0b013e31812f56a6     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Waltzman SB, Cohen NL, Gomolin RH, et al. Open-set speech perception in congenitally deaf children using cochlear implants. Am J Otol 1997;18:342-349.
2. Frijns JH, Briaire JJ, De Laat JA, Grote JJ. Initial evaluation of the Clarion CII cochlear implant: speech perception and neural response imaging. Ear Hear 2002;23:184-197.
3. Cray JW, Allen RL, Stuart A, Hudson S, Layman E, Givens GD. An investigation of telephone use among cochlear implant recipients. Am J Audiol 2004;13:200-212.
4. Zwolan TA, Kileny PR, Telian SA. Self-report of cochlear implant use and satisfaction by prelingually deafened adults. Ear Hear 1996;17:198-210.
5. Teoh SW, Pisoni DB, Miyamoto RT. Cochlear implantation in adults with prelingual deafness. Part I. Clinical results. Laryngoscope 2004;114:1536-1540.
6. Osberger MJ, Fisher L. Preoperative predictors of postoperative implant performance in children. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl 2000;185:44-46.
7. Friedland DR, Venick HS, Niparko JK. Choice of ear for cochlear implantation: the effect of history and residual hearing on predicted postoperative performance. Otol Neurotol 2003;24:582-589.
8. Rubinstein JT, Parkinson WS, Tyler RS, Gantz BJ. Residual speech recognition and cochlear implant performance: effects of implantation criteria. Am J Otol 1999:20;445-452.
9. Kilgard MP, Pandya PK, Engineer ND, et al. Cortical network reorganization guided by sensory input features. Biol Cybern 2002;87:333-343.
10. Oller DK. Eilers RE. The role of audition in infant babbling. Child Dev 1988;59:441-449.
11. Teoh SW, Pisoni DB, Miyamoto RT. Cochlear implantation in adults with prelingual deafness. Part II. Underlying constraints that affect audiological outcomes. Laryngoscope 2004;114:1714-1719.
12. Torrance GW, Feeny DH, Furlong WJ, Barr RD, Zhang Y, Wang Q. Multiattribute utility function for a comprehensive health status classification system. Health Utilities Index Mark 2. Med Care 1996;34:702-722.
13. Hinderink JB, Krabbe PF, Van Den Broek BP. Development and application of a health-related quality-of-life instrument for adults with cochlear implants: the Nijmegen cochlear implant questionnaire. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2000;123:756-765.
14. Krabbe PF, Hinderink JB, Van Den Broek BP. The effect of cochlear implant use in postlingually deaf adults. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2000;16:864-873.
15. Francis HW, Chee N, Yeagle J, Cheng A, Niparko JK. Impact of cochlear implants on the functional health status of older adults. Laryngoscope 2002;112:1482-1488.