Agreement of predicted 305-day milk yields relative to actual 305-day milk weight yields

Journal of Dairy Science

Volumn 90, Issue 10, 2007, Pages 4684-4692

  Quist, M A ^a   LeBlanc, S J ^a   Hand, K J ^b   Lazenby, D ^b   Migllor, F ^c,d   Kelton, D F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GUELPH   (Canada)

^b Ontario Dairy Herd Improvement Corp   (Canada)

^c AGRICULTURE AND AGRI FOOD CANADA   (Canada)

^d CANADIAN DAIRY NETWORK   (Canada)

Author keywords

Daily milk weight; Electronic identification; Electronic milk meter; Multiple trait procedure

Indexed keywords

EID: 35748986140     PISSN: 00220302     EISSN: 15253198     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3168/jds.2006-833     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Averdunk, G., J. Aumann, and J. Duda. 1998. Tendencies in AM/PM recording in Germany and non-conventional recording methods in the future. Pages 139-145 in EAAP Publ. 91: Proc. 31st ICAR Session Mtg., Rotorua, New Zealand. Eur. Assoc. Anim. Prod., Rome, Italy.
2. Bunger, A., K. Kuwan, F. Reinhardt, H.-U. Brahmstaedt, and R. Reents. 2004. Benefits from daily milk recording data. Pages 229-235 in EAAP Publ. 113: Proc. 34th ICAR Session Mtg., Sousse, Tunisia. Eur. Assoc. Anim. Prod., Rome, Italy.
3. Canadian Dairy Information Centre. 2006. Subject: Enrollments on milk recording. http://www.dairyinfo.gc.ca/cdicfpmilkr.htm Accessed July 13, 2006.
4. Funk, D. A. 2002. Performance recording: Different strategies and breeders' needs. Pages 41-46 in EAAP Publ. 107: Proc. 33rd ICAR Session Mtg., Interlaken, Switzerland. Eur. Assoc. Anim. Prod., Rome, Italy.
5. Hand, K. J., D. Lazenby, F. Miglior, D. F. Kelton, and M. A. Quist-Moyer. 2006. Use of daily milk weight to predict lactation and 24-hour yields. Pages 48-52 in Proc. 35th ICAR Session Mtg., Kuopio, Finland. Eur. Assoc. Anim. Prod., Rome, Italy.
6. International Committee for Animal Recording. 2006. Subject: Recording Devices. http://www.icar.org/pages/Sub_Committees/sc_recording_devices.htm Accessed August 2, 2006.
7. Koorn, D. S. 1998. The introduction of a milk recording system based on milk yields of ICAR approved electronic milk meters and AT4 sampling for fat, protein and SCC. Pages 147-150 in EAAP Publ. 91: Proc. 31st ICAR Session Mtg., Rotorua, New Zealand. Eur. Assoc. Anim. Prod., Rome, Italy.
8. Lefcourt, A. M. 1999. Method to monitor the precision of milk yields recorded at individual milking stalls on daily basis. J. Dairy Sci. 82:953-956.
9. Lin, L. I. 1989. A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility. Biometrics 45:255-268.
10. Miglior, F., S. de Roos, Z. Liu, S. Mattalia, L. R. Schaeffer, A. Tondo, and P. VanRaden. 2006. Report of the ICAR working group on lactation calculation methods: A survey on milk recording strategies in dairy cattle. Pages 145-149 in Proc. of 35th ICAR Session Mtg., Kuopio, Finland. Eur. Assoc. Anim. Prod., Rome, Italy.
11. Ng-Kwai-Hang, K. F., J. F. Hayes, J. E. Moxley, and H. G. Monardes. 1984. Variability of test-day milk production and composition and relations of somatic cell counts with yield and compositional changes of bovine milk. J. Dairy Sci. 67:361-366.
12. SAS Institute. 2000. SAS/STATC User's Guide. Version 8. SAS Inst. Inc., Cary, NC.
13. Schaeffer, L. R., and J. Jamrozik. 1996. Multiple-trait prediction of lactation yields for dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 79:2044-2055.
14. Sphar, S. L. 1993. New technologies and decision making in high producing herds. J. Dairy Sci. 76:3269-3277.