Laboratory evolution of polyandry in the parasitoid wasp Nasonia vitripennis

Animal Behaviour

Volumn 74, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 1147-1154

  Burton Chellew, Maxwell N ^a   Beukeboom, Leo W ^b   West, Stu A ^a   Shuker, David M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

copulation duration; courtship; female receptivity; multiple mating; Nasonia vitripennis; parasitoid wasp; remating

Indexed keywords

COPULATION; COURTSHIP; EVOLUTION; MATING BEHAVIOR; MULTIPLE MATING; PARASITOID; POLYANDRY; WASP;

NASONIA VITRIPENNIS;

EID: 35748983252     PISSN: 00033472     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2006.09.028     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Andersson M.B. Sexual Selection (1994), Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey
2. Arnold S.J., and Duvall D. Animal mating systems: a synthesis based on selection theory. American Naturalist 143 (1994) 317-348
3. Arnqvist G., and Nilsson T. The evolution of polyandry: multiple mating and female fitness in insects. Animal Behaviour 60 (2000) 145-164
4. Arnqvist G., and Rowe L. Sexual Conflict (2005), Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey
5. Bernasconi G., and Keller L. Female polyandry affects their sons' reproductive success in the red flour beetle Tribolium castaneum. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 14 (2001) 186-193
6. Beukeboom L.W., and Van den Assem J. Courtship and mating behaviour of interspecific Nasonia hybrids (Hymenoptera, Pteromalidae): a grandfather effect. Behavior Genetics 31 (2001) 167-177
7. Beukeboom L.W., and Van den Assem J. Courtship displays of introgressed, interspecific hybrid Nasonia males: further investigations into the 'grandfather effect'. Behaviour 139 (2002) 1029-1042
8. Birkhead T.R., and Møller A.P. Extra-pair copulation and extra-pair paternity in birds. Animal Behaviour 49 (1995) 843-848
9. Blanckenhorn W.U., Hosken D.J., Martin O.Y., Reim C., Teuschl Y., and Ward P.I. The costs of copulating in the dung fly Sepsis cynipsea. Behavioral Ecology 13 (2002) 353-358
10. Bordenstein S.R., Drapeau M.D., and Werren J.H. Intraspecific variation in sexual isolation in the jewel wasp Nasonia. Evolution 54 (2000) 567-573
11. Carracedo M.C., Casares P., Izquierdo J.I., and Piñeiro R. Receptivity and sexual maturation of Drosophila melanogaster females in relation to hybridization with D. simulans males: a populational analysis. Animal Behaviour 42 (1991) 201-208
12. Chapman T., Liddle L.F., Kalb J.M., Wolfner M.F., and Partridge L. Cost of mating in Drosophila melanogaster females is mediated by male accessory gland products. Nature 373 (1995) 241-244
13. Daly M. Cost of mating. American Naturalist 112 (1978) 771-774
14. Drapeau M.D., and Werren J.H. Differences in mating behaviour and sex ratio between three sibling species of Nasonia. Evolutionary Ecology Research 1 (1999) 223-234
15. Drnevich J.M., Papke R.S., Rauser C.L., and Rutowski R.L. Material benefits from multiple mating in female mealworm beetles (Tenebrio molitor L.). Journal of Insect Behavior 14 (2001) 215-230
16. Evans J.P., and Magurran A.E. Multiple benefits of multiple mating in guppies. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, U.S.A. 97 (2000) 10074-10076
17. Fedorka K.M., and Mousseau T.A. Material and genetic benefits of female multiple mating and polyandry. Animal Behaviour 64 (2002) 361-367
18. Fowler K., and Partridge L. A cost of mating in female fruit-flies. Nature 338 (1989) 760-761
19. Gavrilets S. Rapid evolution of reproductive barriers driven by sexual conflict. Nature 403 (2000) 886-889
20. Gavrilets S., and Waxman D. Sympatric speciation by sexual conflict. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, U.S.A. 99 (2002) 10533-10538
21. Gavrilets S., Arnqvist G., and Friberg U. The evolution of female mate choice by sexual conflict. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B 268 (2001) 531-539
22. Grant B., Burton S., Contoreggi C., and Rothstein M. Outbreeding via frequency-dependent mate selection in the parasitoid wasp, Nasonia (=Mormoniella) vitripennis Walker. Evolution 34 (1980) 983-992
23. Grant C.A., Chapman T., Pomiankowski A., and Fowler K. No detectable genetic correlation between male and female mating frequency in the stalk-eyed fly Cyrtodiopsis dalmanni. Heredity 95 (2005) 444-448
24. Halliday T., and Arnold S.J. Multiple mating by females: a perspective from quantitative genetics. Animal Behaviour 35 (1987) 939-941
25. Hamilton W.D. Extraordinary sex ratios. Science 156 (1967) 477-488
26. Harano T., and Miyatake T. Heritable variation in polyandry in Callosobruchus chinensis. Animal Behaviour 70 (2005) 299-304
27. Holmes H.B. Patterns of sperm competition in Nasonia vitripennis. Canadian Journal of Genetics and Cytology 16 (1974) 789-795
28. Jennions M.D., and Petrie M. Why do females mate multiply? A review of the genetic benefits. Biological Reviews 75 (2000) 21-64
29. Kamimura Y. Effects of repeated mating and polyandry on the fecundity, fertility and maternal behaviour of female earwigs, Euborellia plebeja. Animal Behaviour 65 (2003) 205-214
30. King B.H., Grimm K.M., and Reno H.E. Effects of mating on female locomotor activity in the parasitoid wasp Nasonia vitripennis (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae). Environmental Entomology 29 (2000) 927-933
31. Konior M., Radwan J., and Kolodziejczyk M. Polyandry increases offspring fecundity in the bulb mite. Evolution 55 (2001) 1893-1896
32. Kraus F.B., Neumann P., and Moritz R.F.A. Genetic variance of mating frequency in the honeybee (Apis mellifera L.). Insectes Sociaux 52 (2005) 1-5
33. LaMunyon C.W. Increased fecundity, as a function of multiple mating, in an arctiid moth, Utetheisa ornatrix. Ecological Entomology 22 (1997) 69-73
34. Leonard J.E., and Boake C.R.B. Site-dependent aggression and mating behaviour in three species of Nasonia (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae). Animal Behaviour 71 (2006) 641-647
35. Lopez-Arroyo J.I., Tauber C.A., and Tauber M.J. Intermittent oviposition and remating in Ceraeochrysa cincta (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Annals of the Entomological Society of America 92 (1999) 587-593
36. Mackay T.F.C., Heinsohn S.L., Lyman R.F., Moehring A.J., Morgan T.J., and Rollmann S.M. Genetics and genomics of Drosophila mating behavior. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, U.S.A. 102 (2005) 6622-6629
37. McRobert S.P., Schnee F.B., and Tompkins L. Selection for increased female sexual receptivity in raised stocks of Drosophila melanogaster. Behavior Genetics 25 (1995) 303-309
38. Maklakov A.A., and Lubin Y. Sexual conflict over mating in a spider: increased fecundity does not compensate for the costs of polyandry. Evolution 58 (2004) 1135-1140
39. Martin O.Y., and Hosken D.J. Costs and benefits of evolving under experimentally enforced polyandry or monogamy. Evolution 57 (2003) 2765-2772
40. Martin O.Y., and Hosken D.J. Reproductive consequences of population divergence through sexual conflict. Current Biology 14 (2004) 906-910
41. Parker G.A., and Partridge L. Sexual conflict and speciation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B 353 (1998) 261-274
42. Piñeiro R., Carracedo M.C., Izquierdo J.I., and Casares P. Bidirectional selection for female receptivity in Drosophila melanogaster. Behavior Genetics 23 (1993) 77-83
43. Rowe L., Arnqvist G., Sih A., and Krupa J. Sexual conflict and the evolutionary ecology of mating patterns: water striders as a model system. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 9 (1994) 289-293
44. Saul G.B., and Kayhart M. Mutants and linkage in Mormoniella. Genetics 41 (1956) 930-937
45. Sgro C.M., and Partridge L. Evolutionary responses of the life history of wild-caught Drosophila melanogaster to two standard methods of laboratory culture. American Naturalist 156 (2000) 341-353
46. Shuker D.M., and Day T.H. The repeatability of a sexual conflict over mating. Animal Behaviour 61 (2001) 755-762
47. Shuker D.M., and Day T.H. Mate sampling and the sexual conflict over mating in seaweed flies. Behavioral Ecology 13 (2002) 83-86
48. Shuker D.M., Phillimore A.J., Burton-Chellew M.N., Hodge S.E., and West S.A. The quantitative genetic basis of polyandry in the parasitoid wasp, Nasonia vitripennis. Heredity 98 (2007) 69-73
49. Singh S.R., and Singh B.N. Female remating in Drosophila ananassae: bidirectional selection for remating speed. Behavior Genetics 31 (2001) 361-370
50. Stockley P., and Seal N.J. Plasticity in reproductive effort of male dung flies (Scatophaga stercoraria) as a response to larval density. Functional Ecology 15 (2001) 96-102
51. Stutt A.D., and Siva-Jothy M.T. Traumatic insemination and sexual conflict in the bed bug Cimex lectularius. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, U.S.A. 98 (2001) 5683-5687
52. Thornhill R., and Alcock J. The Evolution of Insect Mating Systems (1983), Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts
53. Torres-Vila L.M., Gragera J., Rodriguez-Molina M.C., and Stockel J. Heritable variation for female remating in Lobesia botrana, a usually monandrous moth. Animal Behaviour 64 (2002) 899-907
54. Tregenza T., and Wedell N. Benefits of multiple mates in the cricket Gryllus bimaculatus. Evolution 52 (1998) 1726-1730
55. Tregenza T., and Wedell N. Polyandrous females avoid costs of inbreeding. Nature 415 (2002) 71-73
56. Vahed K. The function of nuptial feeding in insects: review of empirical studies. Biological Reviews 73 (1998) 43-78
57. Van den Assem J., and Feuth-de Bruijn E. Second matings and their effect on sex-ratio of offspring in Nasonia vitripennis (Hymenoptera-Pteromalidae). Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 21 (1977) 23-28
58. Van den Assem J., and Jachmann F. Changes in male perseverance in courtship and female readiness to mate in a strain of the parasitic wasp Nasonia vitripennis over a period of 20+ years. Netherlands Journal of Zoology 49 (1999) 125-137
59. Van den Assem J., and Werren J.H. A comparison of the courtship and mating behavior of 3 species of Nasonia (Hymenoptera, Pteromalidae). Journal of Insect Behavior 7 (1994) 53-66
60. Van den Assem J., Gijswijt M.J., and Nubel B.K. Observations on courtship strategies and mating strategies in a few species of parasitic wasps (Chalcidoidea). Netherlands Journal of Zoology 30 (1980) 208-227
61. Van den Assem J., Jachmann F., and Simbolotti P. Courtship behavior of Nasonia vitripennis (Hym, Pteromalidae): some qualitative, experimental evidence for the role of pheromones. Behaviour 75 (1980) 301-307
62. Wedell N., and Karlsson B. Paternal investment directly affects female reproductive effort in an insect. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B 270 (2003) 2065-2071
63. Wedell N., Wiklund C., and Cook P.A. Monandry and polyandry as alternative lifestyles in a butterfly. Behavioral Ecology 13 (2002) 450-455
64. Whiting A.R. Biology of parasitic wasp Mormoniella vitripennis [=Nasonia brevicornis] (Walker). Quarterly Review of Biology 42 (1967) 333-406
65. Whiting P.W. Mutant types in Mormoniella. Genetics 35 (1950) 140
66. Whiting P.W. Comparable mutant eye colours in Mormoniella and Pachycrepoideus. Evolution 8 (1954) 135-147
67. Worden B.D., and Parker P.G. Polyandry in grain beetles, Tenebrio molitor, leads to greater reproductive success: material or genetic benefits?. Behavioral Ecology 12 (2001) 761-767