The client-clinician assessment protocol (C-CAP): Evaluation of its psychometric properties for use with people aging with disabilities in need of home modifications

OTJR Occupation, Participation and Health

Volumn 27, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 140-148

  Petersson, Ingela ^a   Fisher, Anne C ^b   Hemmingsson, Helena ^a   Lilja, Margareta ^a  

^a KAROLINSKA INSTITUTE   (Sweden)

^b UMEÅ UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Activities of daily living; Rasch analysis; Self report

Indexed keywords

AGED; AGING; ARTICLE; CLIENT CLINICIAN ASSESSMENT PROTOCOL; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; DISABILITY; EVALUATION; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HOME ENVIRONMENT; HUMAN; INDEPENDENCE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PSYCHOMETRY; RASCH ANALYSIS; RELIABILITY; SAFETY; SELF REPORT; VALIDITY;

EID: 35748978860     PISSN: 15394492     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/153944920702700404     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Albrecht, G. L., Jette, A. M., Petri, H., & Siegel, L. (2001). An evaluation of Swedish disability research. Stockholm: Swedish Council for Working Life and Social Research.
2. American Association of Retired Persons. (2003). A report to the nation on independent living and disability. Washington, DC: Author.
3. Beaton, D. E., Bombardier, C., Guillemin, F., & Ferraz, M. B. (2000). Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine, 25, 3186-3191.
4. Bond, T. G., & Fox, C. M. (2001). Applying the Rasch model: fundamental measurements in human sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, Inc.
5. Boverket. (2000). Handbok for bostadsanpassningsbidraget [Guidelines for the home modification grant]. Karlshamn, Sweden: Boverket.
6. Doble, S. E., & Fisher, A. G. (1998). The dimensionality and validity of the Older Americans Recourses and Services (OARS) Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Scale. Journal of Outcome Measurement, 2, 4-24.
7. Fänge, A., & Iwarsson, S. (2005). Changes in ADL dependence and aspects of usability following housing adaptations: A longitudinal perspective. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 59, 296-304.
8. Fillenbaum, G. G. (1988). Multidimensional functional assessment of older adults: The Duke older Americans resources and services procedures. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, Inc.
9. Fisher, A. G. (1997). Multifaceted measurement of daily life task performance: Conceptualizing a test of instrumental ADL and validating the addition of personal ADL tasks. Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation: State of the Art Reviews, 11, 289-303.
10. Fisher, A. G. (2005). Assessment of motor and process skills: Development, standardization, and administration manual (6th ed.). Fort Collins, CO: Three Star Press.
11. Fisher, W. P. (1992). Reliability statistics. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 6, 238.
12. Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E., & McHugh, P. R. (1975). "Mini-Mental State": A practical guide for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 12, 189-198.
13. Fried, L. P., Young, Y., Rubin, G., & Bandeen-Roche, K., and the WHAS II Collaborative Research Group. (2001). Self-reported preclinical disability identifies older women with early declines in performance and early disease. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 54, 889-901.
14. Gill, T. M., Robison, J. T., & Tinetti, M. E. (1998). Difficulty and dependence: Two components of the disability continuum among community-living older persons. Annals of Internal Medicine, 128, 96-101.
15. Gitlin, L. N., & Corcoran, M. (2000). Client-Clinician Assessment Protocol (C-CAP). Philadelphia: Thomas Jefferson University.
16. Guralnik, J. M., Branch, L. G., Cummings, S. R., & Curb, J. D. (1989). Physical performance measures in aging research. Journal of Gerontology, 44, M141-M146.
17. Iwarsson, S. (2005). A long-term perspective on person-environment fit and ADL dependence among older Swedish adults. The Gerontologist, 45, 327-336.
18. Jagger, C., Arthur, A. J., Spiers, N. A., & Clarke, M. (2001). Patterns of onset of disability in activities of daily living with age. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 49, 404-409.
19. Katz, S., Ford, A. B., Moskowitz, R. W., Jackson, B. A., & Jaffe, M. W. (1963). Studies of illness in the aged. The Index of ADL: A standardized measure of biological and psychosocial function. Journal of the American Medical Association, 185, 914-919.
20. Keith, R. A., Granger, C. V., Hamilton, B. B., & Sherwin, F. S. (1987). The functional independence measure: A new tool for rehabilitation. Advances in Clinical Rehabilitation, 1, 6-18.
21. Kielhofner, G. (1995). A model of human occupation: Theory and application (2nd ed.). Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins.
22. Kielhofner, G. (2002). A model of human occupation: Theory and application (3rd ed.). Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins.
23. Küçükdeveci, A., Yavuzer, G., Tennant, A., Süldür, N., Sonel, B., & Arasil, T. (2000). Adaptation of the modified Barthel Index for use in physical medicine and rehabilitation in Turkey. Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 32, 87-92.
24. Lawton, M. P., & Brody, E. M. (1969). Assessment of older people: Self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. The Gerontologist, 9, 179-186.
25. Lawton, M. P., & Nahemov, L. E. (1973). Ecology and the aging process. In C. Eisdorfer & M. P. Lawton (Eds.), The psychology of adult development and aging (pp. 619-674). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
26. Lilja, M. (2002). Riktlinjer för användning av Client-Clinician Assessment Protocol (C-CAP) [Guidelines for using Client-Clinician Assessment Protocol (C-CAP)]. Stockholm: Karolinska Institutet.
27. Linacre, J. M. (1994-2005). FACETS: Many-facet Rasch measurement computer program (Version 3.54). Chicago: MESA.
28. Linacre, J. M. (2002). Optimizing rating scale category effectiveness. Journal of Applied Measurement, 3, 85-106.
29. Linacre, J. M., Heinemann, A. W., Wright, B. D., Granger, C. V., & Hamilton, B. B. (1994). The structure and stability of the Functional Independence Measure. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 75, 127-132.
30. Mahoney, F. I., & Barthel, D. W. (1965). Functional evaluation: The Barthel Index. Maryland State Medical Journal, 14, 61-65.
31. Mann, W. C., Hurren, D., Tomita, M., Bengali, M., & Steinfeld, E. (1994). Environmental problems in homes of elders with disabilities. Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, 14, 191-211.
32. McCreadie, C., & Tinker, A. (2005). The acceptability of assistive technology to older people. Aging & Society, 25, 91-110.
33. Nilsson, Å. L., Sunnerhagen, K. S., & Grimby, G. (2005). Scoring alternatives for FIM in neurological disorders applying Rasch analysis. Acta Neurologica Scandinavica, 111, 264-273.
34. Radloff, L. S. (1977). The CESD scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1, 385-401.
35. Reuben, D. B., Seeman, T. E., Keeler, E., Hayes, R. P., Bowman, L., & Sewall, A. (2004). Refining the categorization of physical functional status: The added value of combining self-reported and performance-based measures. The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences & Medical Sciences, 59, M1056-M1061.
36. Rogers, J. C., Holm, M. B., & Stone, R. G. (1997). Evaluation of daily living tasks: The home care advantage. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 51, 410-422.
37. Schultz, R., & Heckhausen, J. (1999). Aging, culture and control: Setting a new research agenda. Journal of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences & Social Sciences, 54, P139-P145.
38. Simonsick, E. M., Guralnik, J. M., & Fried, L. P. (1999). Who walks? Factors associated with walking behavior in disabled older women with and without self-reported walking difficulty. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 47, 672-680.
39. Socialstyrelsen. (2002). Äldre som flyttar till service och vård [Elderly that move to service and care]. Stockholm: Author.
40. Steinfeld, E., & Danford, G. S. (1999). Enabling environments: Measuring the impact of environment on disability and rehabilitation. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
41. Streiner, D., & Norman, G. (2003). Health measurement scales. New York: Oxford University Press.
42. Svensk Författningssamling, SFS 1992:1574. Lag om bostadsanpassning mm [Swedish act on home modification grants etc].
43. Tennant, A., Penta, M., Tesio, L., Grimby, G., Thonnard, J. L., Slade, A., et al. (2004). Assessing and adjusting for cross-cultural validity of impairment and activity limitation scales through differential item functioning within the framework of the Rasch model: The PRO-ESOR project. Medical Care, 42, 137-148.
44. Wright, B., & Linacre, J. M. (1994). Reasonable mean-square fit values. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 8, 370.
45. Zimmer, Z., & Chappell, N. L. (1999). Receptivity to new technology among older adults. Disability and Rehabilitation, 21, 222-230.