A comparative analysis of using trip-based versus link-based traffic data for regional mobile source emissions estimation

Atmospheric Environment

Volumn 41, Issue 35, 2007, Pages 7512-7523

  Bai, Song ^a   Niemeier, Debbie A ^a  

^a University of California   (United States)

^b Ethan)   (United States)

Author keywords

Air quality; Emission inventory; Mobile emission; Traffic data; Vehicle trip

Indexed keywords

AIR QUALITY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; VEHICLES;

EMISSION INVENTORY; MOBILE EMISSION; TRAFFIC DATA; VEHICLE TRIP;

TRAFFIC SURVEYS;

AIR QUALITY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EMISSION INVENTORY; METROPOLITAN AREA; NUMERICAL MODEL; POLLUTANT SOURCE; TRAFFIC EMISSION;

AIR POLLUTION; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS; EXHAUST GAS; METHODOLOGY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SIMULATION; TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORT; TRAVEL; UNITED STATES;

CALIFORNIA; KERN COUNTY; NORTH AMERICA; SACRAMENTO; UNITED STATES;

EID: 35748978797     PISSN: 13522310     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.05.051     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. California Air Resources Board, 2001. Public Meeting to Consider Approval of Revisions to The State's On-road Motor Vehicle Emissions Inventory: Technical Support Document. California Environmental Protection Agency, Sacramento, CA.
2. California Air Resources Board, 2002. EMFAC2002: The Latest Update to The On-road Emissions Inventory. California Environmental Protection Agency, Sacramento, CA. Available at: 〈http://www.arb.ca.gov/msei/onroad/briefs/2002.pdf〉.
3. CFR (Code of Federal Regulations) 40, 1997. Transportation Conformity Rule Amendments: Flexibility and Streamlining; Final Rule. 40 CFR Parts 51 and 93. Federal Register.
4. Chatterjee, A., Miller, T., Philpot, J., Wholley, T., Guensler, R., Hartgen, D., Margiotta, R., Stopher, P.R., 1997. Improving Transportation Data for Mobile Source Emission Estimates. National Cooperative Highway Research Program, NCHRP Report 394, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, DC.
5. Citilabs. TP+ 2.2 User's Guide (2001), Citilabs Inc., Oakland, CA
6. DeCorla-Souza, P., Everett, J., Cosby, J., Lim, P., 1994. Trip-based Approach to Estimate Emissions with Environmental Protection Agency's Mobile Model. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1444, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, DC, pp. 118-125.
7. Ito D., Niemeier D., and Garry G. Conformity: how VMT-speed distributions can affect mobile emission inventories. Transportation 28 4 (2001) 409-425
8. Mahmassani H. Dynamic network traffic assignment and simulation methodology for advanced system management applications. Network and Spatial Economics 2001 1 (2001) 267-292
9. Mahmassani, H., Sbayti, H., Victoria, I., Zhou, X., Chiu, Y., 2002. Final Report (Draft): DYNASMART-P Calibration and Evaluation. Prepared for the US Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration and Oak Ridge National Laboratory. Center for Transportation Research, University of Texas, Austin.
10. Mahmassani, H., Sbayti, H., Zhou, X., 2004a. DYNASMART-P Version 930.9 User's Guide. Prepared for the US Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration and Oak Ridge National Laboratory. Maryland Transportation Initiative, University of Maryland.
11. Mahmassani, H., Lu, J., Dong, J., 2004b. DynaBuilder: A Network Converter for DYNASMART-P. DynaBuilder 0.9 User's Guide. Prepared for the US Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration and Oak Ridge National Laboratory. Maryland Transportation Initiative, University of Maryland.
12. Nanzetta K., Niemeier D., and Utts J. Changing speed-VMT distributions: the effects on emissions inventories and conformity. Journal of Air and Waste Management Association 50 (2000) 459-467
13. National Research Council, 2000. Modeling Mobile-Source Emissions. Committee to review EPA's Mobile Source Emissions Factor (MOBILE) Model, Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology. National Academy Press, Washington, DC. Available at: 〈http://www.nap.edu/catalog/9857.html〉.
14. Niemeier, D., Douglas, E., Kear, T., 2002. The California Department of Transportation/Air Resources Board Modeling Program (CAMP): new research to improve speed correction factors and mobile source emissions modeling. UC Davis-Caltrans Air Quality Project Report, prepared for US Environmental Protection Agency, 11th Annual Emission Inventory Conference.
15. Schrank, D., Lomax, T., 2005. The 2005 urban mobility report. Texas Transportation Institute, The Texas A&M University System. Available at: 〈http://mobility.tamu.edu/ums/report〉.
16. Sheffi Y. Urban Transportation Networks: Equilibrium Analysis with Mathematical Programming Methods (1984), Prentice-Hall Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ
17. US Environmental Protection Agency, 2002. Technical guidance on the use of MOBILE6 for emission inventory preparation. Office of Air and Radiation, Office of Transportation and Air Quality, Washington, DC. Available at: 〈http://www.epa.gov/oms/models/mobile6/420r04013.pdf#search=%22Technical%20Guidance%20on%20the%20Use%20of%20MOBILE6%20for%20Emission%20Inventory%20Preparation%22〉.
18. US Environmental Protection Agency, 2004. Green Book: nonattainment areas for criteria pollutants. Available at: 〈http://www.epa.gov/oar/oaqps/greenbk/o3co.html〉.
19. Ziliaskopoulos A., Waller T., Li Y., and Byram M. Large scale dynamic traffic assignment: implementation issues and computational analysis. Journal of Transportation Engineering 130 5 (2004) 585-593