User driven, evidence based experimental design; A new method for interface design used to develop an interface for clinical overview of patient records

Studies in Health Technology and Informatics

Volumn 129, Issue , 2007, Pages 1053-1057

  Boye, Niels ^a,f   Eberholst, Frey ^b,f   Farlie, Richard ^c,f   Sørensen, Lene B ^d,f   Lyng, Karen Marie ^e,f  

^a AARHUS UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

^b IBM Inc   (Denmark)

^c HERNING HOSPITAL   (Denmark)

^d Regional Psychiatric Services Central Denmark Region   (Denmark)

^e TietoEnator   (Denmark)

^f AALBORG UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

Author keywords

clinical; clinical reasoning; computerized; computing methodologies; decisions support systems; medical informatics; medical informatics applications; medical record systems; physician practice patterns; software design; user computer interface

Indexed keywords

APPLICATION PROGRAMS; SOFTWARE DESIGN; STATISTICS; USER INTERFACES;

CLINICAL; CLINICAL REASONING; COMPUTERIZED; COMPUTING METHODOLOGIES; MEDICAL INFORMATICS; MEDICAL INFORMATICS APPLICATIONS; MEDICAL RECORD SYSTEMS; PHYSICIAN PRACTICE PATTERNS; SUPPORT SYSTEMS; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACES;

USER CENTERED DESIGN;

ARTICLE; COMPUTER INTERFACE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; HUMAN; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; MEDICAL RECORD; VALIDATION STUDY;

HUMANS; INFORMATION STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL; MEDICAL RECORDS SYSTEMS, COMPUTERIZED; SOFTWARE; SOFTWARE DESIGN; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 35748974555     PISSN: 09269630     EISSN: 18798365     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. Kanstrup A, Boye N, Nohr C. User-driven design considerations of m-learning services for residents-activation of a theoretical model of clinical knowledge. Medinfo2007, Brisbane 2007
2. Berg M. Working with protocols: a sociological view. Neth J Med 1996; 49(3):119-125
3. Berg M. Medical work and the computer-based patient record: a sociological perspective. Methods Inf Med 1998; 37(3):294-301
4. Berg M. Patient care information systems and health care work: a sociotechnical approach. Int J Med Inf 1999; 55(2):87-101
5. Evans D, Patel VL. Advanced Models of Cognition for Medical Training and Practice. Elsivier, 1991
6. Patel VL, Kaufman DR, Arocha JA, Kushniruk AW. Bridging theory and practice: cognitive science and medical informatics. Medinfo 1995; 8 Pt 2:1278-1282
7. Kushniruk AW, Patel VL. Cognitive computer-based video analysis: its application in assessing the usability of medical systems. Medinfo 1995; 8 Pt 2:1566-1569
8. Patel VL, Kushniruk AW. Interface design for health care environments: the role of cognitive science. Proc AMIA Symp 1998;29-37
9. Kushniruk AW, Kan MY, McKeown K, Klavans J, Jordan D, LaFlamme M et al. Usability evaluation of an experimental text summarization system and three search engines: implications for the reengineering of health care interfaces. Proc AMIA Symp 2002;420-424
10. Wulff H, Gotzsche P. Rationel Klinik. 4 ed. Copenhagen: Munksgaard, 1997
11. Cleveland WS, McGill R. Graphical Perception and Graphical Methods for Analyzing Scientific Data. Science 1985; 229:828-833
12. Cleveland WS. Visualizing Data. Hobart Press, Summit, New Jersey, 1993
13. Cleveland WS. The Elements of Graphing Data. Revised edition ed. Hobart Press, Summi, New Jersey, 1994
14. Nygren E, Henriksson P. Reading the medical record. I. Analysis of physicians' ways of reading the medical record. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 1992; 39(1-2):1-12
15. Nygren E, Wyatt JC, Wright P. Helping clinicians to find data and avoid delays. Lancet 1998; 352(9138):1462-1466
16. Hornbaek K, Frokjaer E. Reading patterns and usability in visualizations of electronic documents. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI) 10 (2)[June 2003], 119-149. 2006. ACM press New York, USA. Ref Type: Electronic Citation
17. Kaushal R, Jha AK, Franz C, Glaser J, Shetty KD, Jaggi T et al. Return on investment for a computerized physician order entry system. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2006; 13(3): 261-266.