Probabilistic evaluation of global seismic capacity of degrading structures

Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics

Volumn 36, Issue 13, 2007, Pages 2043-2058

  Koduru, S D ^a   Haukaas, T ^a   Elwood, K J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Collapse detection; Finite element reliability analysis; Global seismic capacity; Nonlinear static procedures; Probabilistic capacity models; Smoothing techniques

Indexed keywords

COLUMNS (STRUCTURAL); CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; REINFORCED CONCRETE; RELIABILITY; STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS;

COLLAPSE DETECTION; FINITE ELEMENT RELIABILITY ANALYSIS; GLOBAL SEISMIC CAPACITY; NONLINEAR STATIC PROCEDURES; PROBABILISTIC CAPACITY MODELS; SMOOTHING TECHNIQUES;

SEISMIC DESIGN;

DYNAMIC RESPONSE; FAILURE ANALYSIS; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; MODELING; PROBABILITY; RELIABILITY ANALYSIS; SEISMIC HAZARD; SEISMIC RESPONSE;

EID: 35748967555     PISSN: 00988847     EISSN: 10969845     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/eqe.733     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE). Prestandard and Commentary for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings, FEMA 356. Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC, 2000.
2. Applied Technology Council (ATC - Project 55). FEMA 440: Improvement of Nonlinear Static Procedures. Department of Homeland Security, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC, 2005.
3. Applied Technology Council. Seismic evaluation and retrofit of concrete buildings. Report ATC-40, Applied Technology Council, Redwood City, CA, 1996.
4. Chopra AK, Goel RK. Evaluation of NSP to estimate seismic deformation: SDF systems. Journal of Structural Engineering 2000; 126:482-490.
5. Fajfar P. Capacity spectrum method based on inelastic demand spectra. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1999; 28:979-993.
6. Lin Y-Y, Chang K-C, Wang YL. Comparison of displacement coefficient method and capacity spectrum method with experimental results of RC columns. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2004; 33:35-48.
7. Chopra AK, Goel RK. A modal pushover procedure for estimating seismic demands for buildings. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2002; 31:561-582.
8. Sugano S. Seismic behavior of reinforced concrete columns which used ultra-high-strength concrete. Proceedings of the 11th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Pergamon Press/Elsevier: Oxford/ Amsterdam, 1996, Paper No. 1383.
9. Pujol S. Drift capacity of reinforced concrete columns subjected to displacement reversals. Ph.D. Dissertation, School of Civil Engineering, Purdue University, 2002.
10. Elwood KJ, Moehle JP. Drift capacity of reinforced concrete columns with light transverse reinforcement. Earthquake Spectra 2005; 21:71-89.
11. Elwood KJ, Moehle JP. Axial capacity model for shear-damaged columns. ACI Structural Journal 2005; 102: 578-587.
12. Gardoni P, Der Kiureghian A, Mosalam KM. Probabilistic capacity models and fragility estimates for reinforced concrete columns based on experimental observations. Journal of Engineering Mechanics 2002; 128:1024-1038.
13. Zhu L, Elwood KJ, Haukaas T, Gardoni P. Application of a probabilistic drift capacity model for shear-critical columns. American Concrete Institute (ACI), Special Publication 2006; SP-236:81-102.
14. Haukaas T, Der Kiureghian A. Finite element reliability and sensitivity methods for performance-based engineering. Report No. PEER 2003/ 14, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, CA, 2004.
15. McKenna F, Fenves GL, Scott MH. OpenSees: Open System for Earthquake Engineering Simulation. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, CA, 2004.
16. Haukaas T, Elwood KJ. Finite element reliability analysis with degrading reinforced concrete columns. Proceedings of the ICOSSAR 2005, International Conference on Safety and Reliability of Engineering Systems and Structures, Rome, Italy, 2005; 3575-3581.
17. Ditlevsen O, Madsen HO. Structural Reliability Methods. Wiley: Chichester/New York, NY, 1996.
18. Haukaas T, Der Kiureghian A. Parameter sensitivity and importance measures in nonlinear finite element reliability analysis. Journal of Engineering Mechanics 2005; 131:1013-1026.
19. Hohenbichler M, Rackwitz R. Sensitivity and importance measures in structural reliability. Civil Engineering Systems 1986; 3:203-209.
20. Bjerager P, Krenk S. Parameter sensitivity in first order reliability theory. Journal of Engineering Mechanics 1989; 115:1577-1582.
21. Elwood KJ. Modelling failures in existing reinforced concrete columns. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering 2004; 31:846-859.
22. Zhu L, Elwood KJ, Haukaas T. Classification and seismic safety evaluation of existing reinforced concrete columns. Journal of Structural Engineering 2007, in press.
23. Haukaas T, Der Kiureghian A. Strategies for finding the design point in nonlinear finite element reliability analysis. Journal of Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics 2006; 21:133-147.
24. Barbato M, Conte JP. Finite element structural response sensitivity and reliability analyses using smooth versus non-smooth material constitutive models. International Journal of Safety and Reliability 2006; 1:3-39.
25. Sezen H. Seismic response and modeling of reinforced concrete building columns. Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, CA, 2002.
26. Elwood KJ, Moehle JP. Shake table tests and analytical studies on the gravity load collapse of reinforced concrete frames. Report no. PEER 2003/01, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, CA, 2003.