Currency of online breast cancer information

Studies in Health Technology and Informatics

Volumn 129, Issue , 2007, Pages 973-976

  Meric Bernstam, Funda ^a   Walji, Muhammad ^b   Sagaram, Smitha ^b   Sagaram, Deepak ^b   Bernstam, Elmer ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS   (United States)

Author keywords

breast neoplasms; internet; medical informatics; patient satisfaction

Indexed keywords

DISEASES; INTERNET;

BREAST CANCER; BREAST CANCER MANAGEMENTS; BREAST NEOPLASM; CLINICAL PRACTICES; HEALTH INFORMATIONS; MEDICAL INFORMATICS; ONLINE HEALTH INFORMATION; PATIENT SATISFACTION;

WEBSITES;

ARTICLE; BREAST TUMOR; HUMAN; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; INFORMATION SERVICE; INTERNET; TIME;

BREAST NEOPLASMS; HUMANS; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; INFORMATION SERVICES; INTERNET; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 35748963557     PISSN: 09269630     EISSN: 18798365     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. Ries LAG HD, Krapcho M, Mariotto A, Miller BA, Feuer EJ, Clegg L, Eisner MP, Horner MJ, Howlader N, Hayat M, Hankey BF, Edwards BK (eds). SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975-2003. 2006 [cited 2006 December 2]; Available from: http://seer. cancer. gov/csr/1975-2003/
2. Satterlund MJ, McCaul KD, Sandgren AK. Information gathering over time by breast cancer patients. J Med Internet Res. 2003 Jul-Sep;5(3):e15
3. Fox S, Rainie L. Vital decisions: how internet users decide what information to trust when they or their loved ones are sick. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project; 2002 May 22, 2002
4. Hesse BW, Nelson DE, Kreps GL, Croyle RT, Arora NK, Rimer BK, et al. Trust and sources of health information: the impact of the Internet and its implications for health care providers: findings from the first Health Information National Trends Survey. Arch Intern Med. 2005 Dec 12-26;165(22):2618-24
5. Fox S, Rainie L. The online health care revolution: How the Web helps Americans take better care of themselves. Washington DC: Pew Internet and American Life Project: Online; 2000 Novermber 26
6. Helft PR, Hlubocky FJ, Gordon EJ, Ratain MJ, Daugherty C. Hope and the media in advanced cancer patients. American Society of Clinical Oncology 36th annual meeting; 2000 2000; New Orleans, LA; 2000
7. Ask an Expert. 2003
8. Eysenbach G, Kohler C. How do consumers search for and appraise health information on the world wide web? Qualitative study using focus groups, usability tests, and indepth interviews. BMJ. 2002 Mar 9;324(7337):573-7
9. Image-detected breast cancer: state of the art diagnosis and treatment. International Breast Cancer Consensus Conference. J Am Coll Surg. 2001 Sep;193(3):297-302
10. Schwartz GF, Guiliano AE, Veronesi U. Proceeding of the consensus conference of the role of sentinel lymph node biopsy in carcinoma or the breast April 19-22, 2001, Philadelphia, PA, USA. Breast J. 2002 May-Jun;8(3): 124-38
11. Carlson RW, Anderson BO, Bensinger W, Cox CE, Davidson NE, Edge SB, et al. NCCN Practice Guidelines for Breast Cancer. Oncology (Williston Park). 2000 Nov;14(11A): 33-49
12. Harris JR, Halpin-Murphy P, McNeese M, Mendenhall NP, Morrow M, Robert NJ. Consensus Statement on postmastectomy radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1999 Jul 15;44(5):989-90
13. Giordano SH, Duan Z, Kuo YF, Hortobagyi GN, Freeman J, Goodwin JS. Impact of a scientific presentation on community treatment patterns for primary breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2006 Mar 15;98(6):382-8
14. Vicini FA, Kestin L, Chen P, Benitez P, Goldstein NS, Martinez A. Limited-field radiation therapy in the management of early-stage breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2003 Aug 20;95(16):1205-10
15. Walji M, Sagaram S, Meric-Bernstam F, Johnson CW, Bernstam EV. Searching for cancer-related information online: unintended retrieval of complementary and alternative medicine information. Int J Med Inform. 2005 Aug;74(7-8):685-93.