Erratum: Mid-term results of a multicenter study of thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair versus open repair (Perspectives in Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy DOI: 10.1177/1531003507303430);Mid-term results of a multicenter study of thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair versus open repair

Perspectives in Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy

Volumn 19, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 124-130

  Go, Michael R ^a   Cho, Jae Sung ^a   Makaroun, Michel S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Endovascular; TAG; Thoracic aortic aneurysm

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; LENGTH OF STAY; MALE; MULTICENTER STUDY; PHASE 2 CLINICAL TRIAL; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; STENT; THORACIC AORTA ANEURYSM;

AGED; AORTIC ANEURYSM, THORACIC; CLINICAL TRIALS, PHASE II; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; LENGTH OF STAY; MALE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; STENTS;

EID: 35748959922     PISSN: 15310035     EISSN: 15310027     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1531003507311826     Document Type: Erratum

References (13)

1. Dake MD, Miller DC, Semba CP, Mitchell RS, Walker PJ, Liddell RP. Transluminal placement of endovascular stentgrafts for the treatment of descending thoracic aortic aneurysms. N Engl J Med. 1994;331:1729-1734.
2. Brandt M, Hussel K, Walluscheck KP, et al. Stent-graft repair versus open surgery for the descending aorta: a case-control study. J Endovasc Ther. 2004;11:535-538.
3. Stone DH, Brewster DC, Kwolek CJ, et al. Stent-graft versus open-surgical repair of the thoracic aorta: midterm results. J Vasc Surg. 2006;44:1188-1197.
4. Najibi S, Terramani TT, Weiss VJ, et al. Endoluminal versus open treatment of descending thoracic aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg. 2002;36:732-737.
5. Bavaria JE, Appoo JJ, Makaroun MS, Verter J, Yu ZF, Mitchell RS; Gore TAG Investigators. Endovascular stent grafting versus open surgical repair of descending thoracic aortic aneurysms in low-risk patients: a multicenter comparative trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2007;133: 369-377.
6. Makaroun MS, Dillavou ED, Kee ST, et al. Endovascular treatment of thoracic aortic aneurysms: results of the phase II multicenter trial of the Gore TAG thoracic endoprosthesis. J Vasc Surg. 2005;41:1-9.
7. Greenberg RK, O'Neill S, Walker E, et al. Endovascular repair of thoracic aortic lesions with the Zenith TX1 and TX2 thoracic grafts: intermediate term results. J Vasc Surg. 2005;41:589-596.
8. Ellozy SH, Carroccio A, Minor M, et al. Challenges of endovascular tube graft repair of thoracic aortic aneurysm: midterm follow-up and lessons learned. J Vasc Surg. 2003;38:676-683.
9. Cho JS, Dillavou ED, Rhee RY, Makaroun MS. Late abdominal aortic aneurysm enlargement after endovascular repair with the Excluder device. J Vasc Surg. 2004; 39:1236-1241.
10. Haider SE, Najjar SF, Cho JS, et al. Sac behavior after aneurysm treatment with the Gore Excluder lowpermeability aortic endoprosthesis: 12-month comparison to the original Excluder device. J Vasc Surg. 2006;44: 694-700.
11. EVAR trial participants. Endovascular aneurysm repair versus open repair in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR trial 1): randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2005;365:2179-2186.
12. EVAR trial participants. Endovascular aneurysm repair and outcome in patients unfit for open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR trial 2): randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2005;365:2187-2192.
13. Leurs LJ, Bell R, Degrieck Y, Thomas S, Hobo R, Lundbom J; EUROSTAR; UK Thoracic Endograft Registry collaborators. Endovascular treatment of thoracic aortic diseases: combined experience from the EUROSTAR and United Kingdom Thoracic Endograft registries. J Vasc Surg. 2004;40:670-679.