Development, deployment and usability of a point-of-care decision support system for chronic disease management using the recently-approved HL7 decision support service standard

Studies in Health Technology and Informatics

Volumn 129, Issue , 2007, Pages 861-865

  Lobach, David F ^a   Kawamoto, Kensaku ^a   Anstrom, Kevin J ^b   Russell, Michael L ^c   Woods, Peter ^c   Smith, Dwight ^c  

^a Division of Clinical Informatics Baystate Health   (United States)

^b Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics ^*  (United States)

^c DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

clinical decision support; decision support servic; Health Level 7; service oriented architecture; web services

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; DISEASES; INFORMATION SERVICES; SERVICE ORIENTED ARCHITECTURE (SOA); WEB SERVICES;

CHRONIC DISEASE MANAGEMENT; CLINICAL DECISION SUPPORT; CLINICAL DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS; DECISION SUPPORT SERVICES; DECISION SUPPORTS; HEALTH LEVEL 7; INDUSTRIALIZED NATIONS; INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS;

DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS;

ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO COMPUTERS; CHRONIC DISEASE; COMPUTER SYSTEM; CONSUMER; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; DISEASE MANAGEMENT; HOSPITAL INFORMATION SYSTEM; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; STANDARD; UTILIZATION REVIEW;

ATTITUDE TO COMPUTERS; CHRONIC DISEASE; COMPUTER SYSTEMS; CONSUMER SATISFACTION; DATA COLLECTION; DECISION MAKING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, CLINICAL; DISEASE MANAGEMENT; HUMANS; POINT-OF-CARE SYSTEMS;

EID: 35748956883     PISSN: 09269630     EISSN: 18798365     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (28)

1. National Library of Medicine. MEDLINE Fact Sheet. Available at: http://www. nlm. nih. gov/pubs/factsheets/ medline. html. Accessed 12/4/06.
2. Davis DA, Thomson MA, Oxman AD, and Haynes RB. Changing physician performance. A systematic review of the effect of continuing medical education strategies. AMA 1995:274:700-705.
3. McGlynn EA, Asch SM, Adams J, Keesey J, Hicks J, DeCristofaro A, and Kerr EA. The quality of health care delivered to adults in the United States. N Engl J Med 2003:348:2635-2645.
4. Kohn LT, Corrigan JM, and Donaldson MS, eds. To Err is Human: Building a Safer Health System. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1999.
5. Vincent C, Neale G, and Woloshynowych M. Adverse events in British hospitals: preliminary retrospective record review. BMJ 2001:322:517-519.
6. Hunt DL, Haynes RB, Hanna SE, and Smith K. Effects of computer-based clinical decision support systems on physician performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review. JAMA 1998:280:1339-1346.
7. Kawamoto K, Houlihan CA, Balas EA, and Lobach DF. Improving clinical practice using clinical decision support systems: a systematic review of trials to identify features critical to success. BMJ 2005. 330:765-768.
8. Southern California Evidence-based Practice Center. Costs and Benefits of Health Information Technology. Evidence Report/Technology Assessment, Number 132. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. April 2006. http://www. ahrq. gov/downloads/pub/evidence/pdf/ hitsyscosts/hitsys. pdf. Accessed 11/28/06.
9. Kawamoto K. Integration of knowledge resources into applications to enable clinical decision support: architectural considerations. In Greenes RA, ed. Medical Decision-Making: Computer-Based Approaches to Achieving Healthcare Quality and Safety. Burlington, MA: Elsevier, Inc. 2007; pp. 503-538.
10. Boxwala AA, Tu S, Peleg M, Zeng Q, Ogunyemi O, Greenes RA, Shortliffe EH, and Patel VL. Toward a representation format for sharable clinical guidelines. J Biomed Inform 2001:34:157-169.
11. Johnson PD, Tu S, Booth N, Sugden B, and Purves IN. Using scenarios in chronic disease management guidelines for primary care. Proc AMIA Symp 2000:389-393.
12. Tu SW, Musen MA, Shankar R, Campbell J, Hrabak K, McClay J, Huff SM, McClure R, Parker C, Rocha R, Abarbanel R, Beard N, Glasgow J, Mansfield G, Ram P, Ye Q, Mays E, Weida T, Chute CG, McDonald K, Molu D, Nyman MA, Scheitel S, Solbrig H, Zill DA, and Goldstein MK. Modeling guidelines for integration into clinical workflow. Medinfo 2004:2004:174-178.
13. First DataBank. Drug Information Framework Information Page. Available at: http://www. firstdatabank. com/ products/di-framework/. Accessed 12/4/06.
14. Peleg M, Boxwala AA, Ogunyemi O, Zeng Q, Tu S, Lacson R, Bernstam E, Ash N, Mork P, Ohno-Machado L, Shortliffe EH, and Greenes RA. GLIF3: the evolution of a guideline representation format. Proc AMIA Symp 2000:645-649.
15. Shiffman RN, Michel G, Essaihi A, and Thornquist E. Bridging the guideline implementation gap: a systematic, document-centered approach to guideline implementation. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2004:11:418-426.
16. Pryor TA, and Hripcsak G. The Arden syntax for medical logic modules. Int J Clin Monit Comput 1993:10:215-224.
17. Karadimas HC, Chailloleau C, Hemery F, Simonnet J, and Lepage E. Arden/J: an architecture for MLM execution on the Java platform. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2002:9:359-368.
18. Zielstorff RD. Online practice guidelines: issues, obstacles, and future prospects. J Am Med Inform Assoc 1998:5:227-236.
19. Hunt DL, Haynes RB, Hayward RS, Pim MA, and Horsman J. Patient-specific evidence-based care recommendations for diabetes mellitus: development and initial clinic experience with a computerized decision support system. Int J Med Inf 1998:51:127-135.
20. Henry SB, Douglas K, Galzagorry G, Lahey A, and Holzemer WL. A template-based approach to support utilization of clinical practice guidelines within an electronic health record. J Am Med Inform Assoc 1998:5:237-244.
21. Kawamoto K, and Lobach DF. Design, implementation, use, and preliminary evaluation of SEBASTIAN, a standardsbased Web service for clinical decision support. Proc AMIA Symp 2005:380-384.
22. Huang C, Noirot LA, Heard KM, Reichley RM, Dunagan C, and Bailey TC. Implementation of Virtual Medical Record Object Model for a Standards-Based Clinical Decision Support Rule Engine. Proc AMIA Symp 2006:958.
23. Goldberg HS, Vashevko M, Pastilnik A, Smith K, Plaks N, and Blumenfeld BM. Evaluation of a Commercial Rule Engine as a Basis for a Clinical Decision Support Service. Proc AMIA Symp 2006:294-298.
24. Health Level 7. HL7 Decision Support Service specification (Draft Standard for Trial Use). Available at: http://www. hl7. org/v3ballot/html/ infrastructure/dss/ dss. htm. Accessed 11/27/06.
25. Cerami E. Top ten FAQs for Web services. Available at: http://webservices. xml. com/pub/a/ws/2002/02/12/ webservicefaqs. html. Accessed 11/27/06.
26. Doll WJ, and Torkzadeh G. The Measurement of End-User Computing Satisfaction. MIS Quarterly 1988:12:259-274.
27. Davis FD. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly 1989:13:319-340.
28. Kawamoto K, and Lobach DF. Proposal for fulfilling strategic objectives of the U. S. roadmap for national action on decision support through a service-oriented architecture leveraging HL7 services. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2007:14:146-155.