Effect of occlusion and semi-occlusion on experimental skin wound healing: A reevaluation

Wounds

Volumn 19, Issue 10, 2007, Pages 270-276

  Zhai, Hongbo ^a   Maibach, Howard I ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 35748932943     PISSN: 10447946     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Eaglstein WH.Moist wound healing with occlusive dressings: a clinical focus. Dermatol Surg. 2001;27(2):175-181.
2. Winter GD. Formation of the scab and the rate of epithelization of superficial wounds in the skin of the young domestic pig. Nature. 1962;193:293-294.
3. Hinman CD, Maibach H. Effect of air exposure and occlusion on experimental human skin wounds. Nature. 1963;200:377-378.
4. Winter GD. Effect of air exposure and occlusion on experimental human skin wounds. Nature. 1963;200:378-379.
5. Silverman RA, Lender J, Elmets CA. Effects of occlusive and sem semiocclusive dressings on the return of barrier function to transepidermal water loss in standardized human wounds. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1989;20(5 Pt 1):755-760.
6. Eaglstein WH, Mertz PM, Falanga V. Wound dressings: current and future. Prog Clin Biol Res. 1991;365:257-265.
7. Kannon GA, Garrett AB. Moist wound healing with occlusive dressings. A clinical review. Dermatol Surg. 1995;21(7):583-590.
8. Proksch E, Feingold KR, Man MQ, Elias PM. Barrier function regulates epidermal DNA synthesis. J Clin Invest. 1991;87(5):1668-1673.
9. Proksch E, Feingold KR, Man MQ, Elias PM. Barrier function regulates epidermal DNA synthesis. J Clin Invest. 1991;87(5): 1668-1673.
10. Levy JJ, von Rosen J, Gassmuller J. Kleine Kuhlmann R, Lange L. Validation of an in-vivo wound healing model for the quantification of pharmacological effects on epidermal regeneration. Dermatology. 1995; 190(2): 136-141.
11. Visscher M, Hoath SB, Conroy E, Wickett RR. Effect of semipermeable membranes on skin barrier repair following tape stripping. Arch Dermatol Res. 2001;293(10):491-499.
12. Fore-Pfliger J. The epidermal skin barrier: implications for the wound care practitioner, part I. Adv Skin Wound Care. 2004;17(8):417-425.
13. Aly R, Shirley C, Cunico B, Maibach HI. Effect of prolonged occlusion on the microbial flora,pH,carbon dioxide and transepidermal water loss on human skin. J Invest Dermatol. 1978:71 (6):378-381.
14. Mertz PM, Eaglstein WH. The effect of a semiocclusive dressing on the microbial population in superficial wounds. Arch Surg. 1984; 119(3) : 287-289.
15. Berardesca E. Maibach HI. Skin occlusion: treatment or drug-like device? Skin Pharmacol. 1988; 1 (3):207-215.
16. Schunck M, Neumann C, Proksch E. Artificial barrier repair in wounds by semiocclusive foils reduced wound contraction and enhanced cell migration and reepithelization in mouse skin. J Invest Dermatol. 2005:125(5): 1063-1071.
17. Zhai H, Maibach HI. Occlusive and semipermeable membranes. In: Rovee DT, Maibach HI, eds.The Epidermis in Wound Healing. Boca Raton, Fla: CRC Press: 2004:103-109.
18. Zhai H, Maibach HI. Micro wound healing models. In: Rovee DT, Maibach HI, eds. The Epidermis in Wound Healing. Boca Raton, Fla: CRC Press; 2004:141-151.
19. Bolton L, McNees P, van Rijswijk L, et al.Wound-healing outcomes using standardized assessment and care in clinical practice. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2004;31(2):65-71.
20. Kligman AM. Hydration injury to human skin. In: Van der Valk PGM, Maibach HI, eds. The Irritant Contact Dermatitis Syndrome. Boca Raton, Fla: CRC Press; 1996:187-194.
21. Bucks D. Guy R, Maibach HI. Effects of occlusion. In: Bronaugh RL, Maibach HI, eds. In vitro Percutaneous Absorption: Principles. Fundamentals, and Applications. Boca Raton, Fla: CRC Press; 1991:85-114.
22. Bucks D. Maibach HI. Occlusion does not uniformly enhance penetration in vivo. In: Bronaugh RL, Maibach HI, eds. Percutaneous Absorption: Drug-Cosmetics-Mechanisms-Methodology. 3rd ed. New York, NY: Marcel Dekker: 1999:81-105.
23. Bucks DA, McMaster JR, Maibach HI, Guy RH. Bioavailability of topically administered steroids: a "mass balance"technique. J Invest Dermatol. 1988;91(1):29-33.
24. Faergemann J, Aly R, Wilson DR, Maibach HI. Skin occlusion: effect on Pityrosporum orbiculare, skin PCO2, pH, transepidermal water loss, and water content. Arch Dermatol Res. 1983:275 (6):383-387.
25. Matsumura H, Oka K, Umekage K, et al. Effect of occlusion on human skin. Contact Dermatitis. 1995;33(4):231-235.
26. Leow YH, Maibach HI. Effect of occlusion on skin. J Dermatol Treat. 1997;8:139-142.
27. Denda M, Sato J, Tsuchiya T. Elias PM, Feingold KR. Low humidity stimulates epidermal DNA synthesis and amplifies the hyperproliferative response to barrier disruption: implication for seasonal exacerbations of inflammatory dermatoses. J Invest Dermatol. 1998; 111(5):873-878.
28. Fluhr JW, Lazzerini S, Distante F, Gloor M, Berardesca E. Effects of prolonged occlusion on stratum corneum barrier function and water holding capacity. Skin Pharmacol Appl Skin Physiol. 1999; 12 (4): 193-198.
29. Warner RR, Boissy YL, Lilly NA, et al. Water disrupts stratum corneum lipid lamellae: damage is similar to surfactants. J Invest Dermatol. 1999; 113(6):960-966.
30. Kligman AM.Hydration injury to human skin: a view from the horny layer. In: Kanerva L. Eisner P. Wahlberg JE. Maibach HI, eds. Handbook of Occupational Dermatology. Berlin, Germany: Springer; 2000:76-80.
31. Zhai H. Maibach HI. Effects of skin occlusion on percutaneous absorption: an overview. Skin Pharmacol Appl Skin Physiol. 2001;14(1):1-10.
32. Zhai H, Maibach HI. Skin occlusion and irritant and allergic contact dermatitis: an overview. Contact Dermatitis. 2001:44(4):201-206.
33. Zhai H, Maibach HI. Occlusion vs. skin barrier function. Skin Res Technol. 2002:8(1):1-6.
34. Eaglstein WH, Mertz PM. New methods for assessing epidermal wound healing: the effects of triamcinolone acetonide and polyethylene film occlusion. J Invest Dermatol. 1978:71(6):382-384.
35. Alvarez OM, Mertz PM, Eaglstein WH. The effect of occlusive dressings on collagen synthesis and re-epithelialization in superficial wounds. J Surg Res. 1983;35(2):142-148.
36. Ramsey DT, Pope ER,Wagner-Mann C, Berg JN, Swaim SF. Effects of three occlusive dressing materials on healingof full-thickness skin wounds in dogs. Am J Vet Res. 1995;56(7):941-949.
37. De Coninck A, Draye JP, Van Strubarq A, et al. Healing of full-thickness wounds in pigs: effects of occlusive and non-occlusive dressings associated with a gel vehicle. J Dermatol Sci. 1996; 13(3):202-211.
38. Ishihara, M, Nakanishi, K, Ono, K, et al. Photocrosslinkable chitosan as a dressing for wound occlusion and accelerator in healing process. Biomaterials. 2002:23(3):833-840.
39. Grubauer G, Feingold KR, Elias PM. Relationship of epidermal lipogenesis to cutaneous barrier function. J Lipid Res. 1987;28(6):746-752.
40. Grubauer G, Elias PM, Feingold KR. Transepidermal water loss: the signal for recovery of barrier structure and function. J Lipid Res. 1989;30(3):323-333.
41. Lee SH, Elias PM, Proksch E. Menon GK, Mao-Quiang M, Feingold KR. Calcium and potassium are important regulators of barrier homeostasis in murine epidermis. J Clin Invest. 1992;89(2):530-538.
42. Taljebini M, Warren R, Mao-Ouiang M, Lane E, Elias PM, Feingold KR. Cutaneous permeability barrier repair following various types of insults: kinetics and effects of occlusion. Skin Pharmacol. 1996:9(2): 111-119.
43. Jiang S, Koo SW, Lee SH. The morphologic changes in lamellar bodies and intercorneocyte lipids after tape stripping and occlusion with a water vapor-impermeable membrane. Arch Dermatol Res. 1998;290(3):145-151.
44. Wood LC, Elias PM, Sequeira-Martin SM, Grunfeld C, Feingold KR. Occlusion lowers cytokine m RNA levels in essential fatty acid-deficient and normal mouse epidermis, but not after acute barrier disruption. J Invest Dermatol. 1994; 103 (6):834-838.
45. Pinski JB. Human dermabrasion as a wound healing model. In: Maibach HI, Lowe N, eds. Models in Dermatology. Basel, Switzerland: Karger; 1987:196-197.
46. Agren MS, Karlsmark T, Hansen JB, Rygaard J. Occlusion versus air exposure on full-thickness biopsy wounds. J Wound Care. 2001; 10(8) : 301-304.
47. Welzel J, Wilhelm KP, Wolff HH. Occlusion does not influence the repair of the permeability barrier in human skin. In: Elsner P, Maibach HI, eds. Irritant Dermatitis. New Clinical and Experimental Aspects. Current Problem in Dermatology. Basel, Switzerland: Karger; 1995;23:180-186.
48. Rovee DT, Kurowsky CA, Labun J, Downes AM. Effect of local wound environment on epidermal healing. In: Maibach HI, Rovee DT, eds. Epidermal Wound Healing. Chicago, III: Year Book Medical Publishers; 1972:159-181.
49. Pollack SV.Wound healing: a review. II. Environmental factors affecting wound healing. J Dermatol Surg Oncol. 1979;5 (6):477-481.
50. Pollack SV. Wound healing: a review. IV. Systemic medications affecting wound healing. J Dermatol Surg Oncol. 1982;8 (8):667-672.
51. Pollack SV.The wound healing process. Clin Dermatol. 1984;2(3):8-16.
52. Rovee DT, Linsky CB, Bothwell JW. Experimental models for the evaluation of wound repair. In: Maibach HI, ed. Animal Models in Dermatology. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 1975:253-266.
53. Bolton L, Vasko AJ, Monte K. Quantification of wound healing. In: Schwindt DA, Maibach HI, eds. Cutaneous Biometrics. New York, NY: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers; 2000:205-219.
54. Hutchinson JJ, McGuckin M. Occlusive dressings: a microbiologic and clinical review. Am J Infect Control. 1990; 18 (4):257-268.
55. Gordon BI, Maibach HI. Adhesive tape anhidrosis. Arch Dermatol. 1969; 100 (4):429-431.
56. Williams C. Algosteril calcium alginate dressing for moderate/ high exudate. Br J Nurs. 1999;8(5): 313-317.
57. Rovee DT, Kurowsky CA, Labun J. Local wound environment and epidermal healing. Mitotic response. Arch Dermatol. 1972:106 (3):330-334.
58. Fisher LB, Maibach HI.The effect of occlusive and semipermeable dressings on the mitotic activity of normal and wounded human epidermis. Br J Dermatol. 1972;86 (6):593-600.