Characterization of firefly habitat using a geographical information system with hydrological simulation

Ecological Modelling

Volumn 209, Issue 2-4, 2007, Pages 392-400

  Kazama, So ^a   Matsumoto, Satoru ^b   Ranjan, S Priyantha ^a   Hamamoto, Hiroshi ^a   Sawamoto, Masaki ^a  

^a TOHOKU UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b Tochigi Prefecture Office   (Japan)

Author keywords

Eco hydrology; Freshwater biology; GIS; Habitat suitability index

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS; JAPAN; WATERSHEDS;

ECO-HYDROLOGY; FRESHWATER BIOLOGY; HABITAT SUITABILITY INDEX;

BIODIVERSITY;

BEETLE; ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS; GIS; HABITAT QUALITY; HABITAT TYPE; HYDROLOGICAL MODELING;

ASIA; EURASIA; FAR EAST; HONSHU; JAPAN; MIYAGI; NATORI BASIN; TOHOKU;

LAMPYRIDAE;

EID: 35748932383     PISSN: 03043800     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2007.06.029     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Abbott M., Bathurst J., and Cunge J. An introduction to the European Hydrological System-Systeme Hydrologique European SHE2: structure of a physically based distributed modeling. J. Hydrol. 87 (1986) 61-77
2. Bayley P.B., and Osborne L.L. Natural rehabilitation of stream fish populations in Illinois catchment. Freshwater Biol. 29 (1993) 295-300
3. Biggs B.J.F. The contribution of disturbance, catchment geology and land use to the habitat template of periphyton in stream ecosystems. Freshwater Biol. 33 (1995) 419-438
4. Biggs B., and Stokseth S. Hydraulic habitat suitability for periphyton in rivers. Regul. River 12 (1996) 251-261
5. Borchardt D., and Davis J. Ecological impact of urban storm water runoff studies in experimental flumes: population loss by drift and refugial space. Aquat. Sci. 52 (1998) 299-314
6. Borchardt D., and Statzner B. Ecological impact of urban stormwater runoff studied in experimental flumes: population loss by drift and availability of refugial space. Aquat. Sci. 52 (1990) 299-314
7. Burch J.B., and Davis G.M. A taxonomic study of the freshwater snail genus Semisulcospira in Japan. Annu. Rep. Am. Malacol. Union 34 (1967) 36-38
8. Christiaens K., and Feyen J. Constraining soil hydraulic parameter and output uncertainty of the distributed hydrological MIKE SHE model using the GLUE framework. Hydrol. Process. 16 (2002) 373-391
9. Clark M.E., Rose K.A., Levine D.A., and Hargrove W.W. Predicting climate change effects on Appalachian trout: combining GIS and individual-based modeling. Ecol. Appl. 11 (2000) 161-178
10. Devineau J.L., and Fournier A. Integrating environmental and sociological approaches to assess the ecology and diversity of herbaceous species in a Sudan-type savanna (Bondoukuy, western Burkina Faso). Flora Morphol. Distrib. Funct. Ecol. Plants 202 5 (2007) 350-370
11. Echhardt K., and Arnold J.G. Automatic calibration of a distributed catchment model. J. Hydrol. 251 (2001) 103-109
12. Haines-Young R., Green D.R., and Cousins S.H. Landscape Ecology and GIS (1993), Taylor and Francis
13. Hirzel A., Hausser J., Chessel D., and Perrin N. Ecological-niche factor analysis: how to compute habitat-suitability maps without absence data. Ecology 83 (2002) 2027-2036
14. Hirzel A., and Guisan A. Which is the optimal sampling strategy for habitat suitability modeling. Ecol. Model. 157 2-3 (2002) 331-341
15. Hirzel A., Helfer V., and Metral F. Assessing habitat-suitability models with a virtual species. Ecol. Model. 145 2-3 (2001) 111-121
16. Hong S.H., Mladenoff D.J., Radeloff V.C., and Crow T.R. Integration of GIS data and classified satellite imagery for regional forest assessment. Ecol. Appl. 8 (1998) 1072-1083
17. Jirayoot K., Sawamoto M., and Kazama S. Quasi-physically based distribution rainfall-runoff model incorporating GIS data. Annu. J. Hydraulic Eng., JSCE 36 (1992) 659-664
18. Karr J.R. Assessment of biotic integrity using fish communities. Fisheries 6 (1981) 21-27
19. Karssenberg D. The value of environmental modeling languages for building distributed hydrological models. Hydrol. Process. 16 (2002) 2751-2766
20. Kite G., and Kouwen N. Watershed modeling using land classifications. Water Resour. Res. 28 (1992) 3193-3200
21. Kobayashi S., and Kagaya T. Differences in litter characteristics and macroinvertebrate assemblages between litter patches in pools and riffles in a headwater stream. Limnology 3 (2002) 37-42
22. Lewis D.M. Importance of GIS to community-based management of wildlife: lessons from Zambia. Ecol. Appl. 5 (1995) 861-871
23. Luis F.G.L., Do Carmo J.S.A., Cortes R.M.V., and Oliveira D. Hydrodynamics and water quality modelling in a regulated river segment: application on the instream flow definition. Ecol. Model. 173 2-3 (2004) 197-218
24. Matthaei C.D., Uehlinger U., and Frutiger A. Response of benthic invertebrates to natural versus experimental distribution in a Swiss pre-alpine river. Freshwater Biol. 37 (1997) 61-77
25. Minami K. The firefly studies. Ohta Bibliopole (1963) (in Japanese)
26. Moss D., Furse M.T., Wright J.F., and Armitage P.D. The prediction of the macroinvertebrate fauna of unpolluted running-water sites in Great Britain using environmental data. Freshwater Biol. 17 (1987) 41-52
27. Munkhtuya S., and Enkhtsetseg B. GIS database of the environmental information. Proceedings of 21st Asian Conference in Remote Sensing (2000) 306-311
28. Naveh Z. Some remarks on recent developments in landscape ecology as a transciplinarity ecological and geographical science. Landscape Ecol. 5 (1991) 65-73
29. Ogbeibu A.E., and Oribhabor B.J. Ecological impact of river impoundment using benthic macro-invertebrates as indicators. Water Res. 36 (2002) 2427-2436
30. Ohba N. Morphology and behavior of the Lampyridae. Sci. Rep. Yokosuka Museum 25 (1978) 15-28
31. Olivera F., and Maidment D. Geographic information systems (GIS)-based spatially distributed model for runoff routing. Water Resour. Res. 35 (1999) 1155-1164
32. Palmer M.A., Belly A.E., and Berg K.A. Responses of invertebrates to lotic distribution: a test of the hyporheic refuge hypothesis. Oecologia 89 (1992) 182-194
33. Poff N.L., and Allan J.D. Functional organization of stream fish assemblages in relation to hydrological variability. Ecology 76 (1995) 606-627
34. Rand G.M., and Newman J.R. The applicability of habitat evaluation methodologies in ecological risk assessment. Hum. Ecol. Risk Assess. 4 4 (1998) 905-929
35. Richter B.D., Baumgartner J.V., Wigington R., and Braun D.P. How much water does a river need. Freshwater Biol. 37 (1997) 231-249
36. Richardson J.S. Food, microhabitat, or both, macroinvertebrate use of leaf accumulations in a montage stream. Freshwater Biol. 27 (1992) 169-176
37. Sa R., Bexiga C., Veiga P., Vieira L., and Erzini K. Feeding ecology and trophic relationships of fish species in the lower Guadiana River Estuary and Castro Marim e Vila Real de Santo António Salt Marsh Estuarine. Coast. Shelf Sci. 70 1-2 (2006) 19-26
38. Silburn G., and Connolly R.D. Distributed parameter hydrology model (ANSWERS) applied to a range of catchment scales using rainfall simulation data. I. Infiltration modeling and parameter measurement. J. Hydrol. 172 (1995) 87-104
39. Su B., Kazama S., Katayama S., and Sawamoto M. Influences of catchment characteristics on nitrogen concentration in largely forested streams during base flow period. Hydrol. Process. 20 20 (2006) 4391-4403
40. Tada T., Kazama S., and Sawamoto M. Estimation of evapotranspiration distribution in Tohoku region. Proceedings of the International Conference of Water Resources and Environmental Resources, vol. 1 (1996) 627-634
41. Taniguchi Y., and Nakano S. Condition-specific competition: implications for the altitude distribution of stream fishes. Ecology 81 (2000) 2027-2039
42. Townsend C.R., Doledec S., and Scarsbrook M.R. Species traits in relation to temporal and spatial heterogeneity in stream: a test of habitat template theory. Freshwater Biol. 37 (1997) 367-387
43. Uemura M., Ishikawa T., Syudou Y., and Fukui Y. About the habitation conditions of Genjibotaru. Annu. J. Hydraulic Eng., JSCE 47 (2003) 1117-1122 (in Japanese)
44. Vachaud F., and Chen T. Sensitivity of a large-scale hydrologic model to quality of input data obtained at different scale; distributed versus stochastic non-distributed modeling. J. Hydrol. 264 (2002) 101-112
45. Voinov A., Costanza R., Wainger L., Boumans R., Villa F., Maxwell T., and Voinov H. Patuxent landscape model: integrated ecological economic modeling of a watershed. Environ. Model. Softw. 14 (1999) 473-491
46. Whitehead P.G., Johnes P.J., and Butterfield D. Steady state and dynamic modeling of nitrogen in the River Kennet: impacts of land use change since the 1930s. Sci. Total Environ. 282-283 (2002) 417-434
47. Winkle W.V., Jager H.I., Railsback S.F., Holcomb B.D., Studley T.K., and Baldrige J.E. Individual-based model of sympatric populations of brown and rainbow trout for instream flow assessment: model description and calibration. Ecol. Model. 110 2 (1998) 175-207
48. Zalewski M. Ecohydrology-the use of ecological and hydrological processes for sustainable management of water resources. Hydrol. Sci. J. 47 (2002) 823-832