Advanced life support cardiac arrest scenario test evaluation

Resuscitation

Volumn 75, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 484-490

  Perkins, Gavin D ^a,b,f   Davies, Robin P ^b   Stallard, Nigel ^a   Bullock, Ian ^c,f   Stevens, Harry ^e   Lockey, Andrew ^d,f  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WARWICK   (United Kingdom)

^b BIRMINGHAM HEARTLANDS HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^c Nursing Institute   (United Kingdom)

^d CALDERDALE AND HUDDERSFIELD NHS FOUNDATION TRUST   (United Kingdom)

^e PRINCE CHARLES HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^f RESUSCITATION COUNCIL UK   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Advanced life support; Assessment; Cardiopulmonary resuscitation; Education; Medical education

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; HEART ARREST; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MEDICAL PRACTICE; MEDICAL PROFESSION; NORMAL HUMAN; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESUSCITATION;

ADVANCED CARDIAC LIFE SUPPORT; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; EDUCATION, PROFESSIONAL; HEART ARREST; HUMANS; PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING; PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 35748932142     PISSN: 03009572     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2007.05.020     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Perkins G., and Lockey A. The advanced life support provider course. BMJ 325 (2002) S81
2. Nolan J.P. Advanced life support training. Resuscitation 50 (2001) 9-11
3. Perkins G.D. Simulation in resuscitation training. Resuscitation 73 (2007) 202-211
4. Perkins GD. Cardiac Arrest Scenario Tests. 2005.
5. Perkins G.D., Hulme J., and Tweed M.J. Variability in the assessment of advanced life support skills. Resuscitation 50 (2001) 281-286
6. Wass V., Van der Vleuten C., Shatzer J., and Jones R. Assessment of clinical competence. Lancet 357 (2001) 945-949
7. Norcini J.J., Blank L.L., Arnold G.K., and Kimball H.R. Examiner differences in the mini-CEX. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 2 (1997) 27-33
8. Schubert A., Tetzlaff J.E., Tan M., Ryckman J.V., and Mascha E. Consistency, inter-rater reliability, and validity of 441 consecutive mock oral examinations in anesthesiology: implications for use as a tool for assessment of residents. Anesthesiology 91 (1999) 288-298
9. McManus I.C., Thompson M., and Mollon J. Assessment of examiner leniency and stringency ('hawk-dove effect') in the MRCP(UK) clinical examination (PACES) using multi-facet Rasch modelling. BMC Med Educ 6 (2006) 42
10. Perkins G.D., and Tweed M.J. Evaluation assessment of advanced life support skills: examiner consistency. Med Educ 35 7 (2001) S60 abstract
11. Weller J.M., Robinson B.J., Jolly B., et al. Psychometric characteristics of simulation-based assessment in anaesthesia and accuracy of self-assessed scores. Anaesthesia 60 (2005) 245-250
12. Gray J.D. Global rating scalres in residency education. Acad Med 71 (1996) S55-S63
13. Newble D.I., and Swanson D.B. Psychometric characterisitcs of the objective structured clinical examination. Med Educ 22 (1988) 325-334
14. Murray D.J., Boulet J.R., Kras J.F., McAllister J.D., and Cox T.E. A simulation-based acute skills performance assessment for anesthesia training. Anesth Analg 101 (2005) 1127-1134 table
15. Morgan P.J., Cleave-Hogg D., and Guest C.B. A comparison of global ratings and checklist scores from an undergraduate assessment using an anesthesia simulator. Acad Med 76 (2001) 1053-1055
16. Ringsted C., Ostergaard L., Penderson R., Berlac P., and van der Vleuten C.P. A feasibility study comparing checklists and global rating forms to assess resident performance in clinical skills. Med Teach 25 (2003) 654-658
17. Boulet J.R., Murray D., Kras J., Woodhouse J., McAllister J., and Ziv A. Reliability and validity of a simulation-based acute care skills assessment for medical students and residents. Anesthesiology 99 (2003) 1270-1280
18. Morgan P.J., Cleave-Hogg D.M., Guest C.B., and Herold J. Validity and reliability of undergraduate performance assessments in an anesthesia simulator. Can J Anaesth 48 (2001) 225-233
19. Regehr G., MacRae H., Reznick R.K., and Szalay D. Comparing the psychometric properties of checklists and global rating scales for assessing performance on an OSCE-format examination. Acad Med 73 (1998) 993-997
20. Hodges B., Regehr G., McNaughton N., Tiberius R., and Hanson M. OSCE checklists do not capture increasing levels of expertise. Acad Med 74 (1999) 1129-1134
21. Wilkinson T.J., Frampton C.M., Thompson-Fawcett M., and Egan T. Objectivity in objective structured clinical examinations: checklists are no substitute for examiner commitment. Acad Med 78 (2003) 219-223
22. Hawkins R., MacKrell G.M., LaDuca T., et al. Assessment of patient management skills and clinical skills of practising doctors using computer-based case simulations and standardised patients. Med Educ 38 (2004) 958-968
23. Soar J., Perkins G.D., Harris S., and Nolan J. The immediate life support course. Resuscitation 57 (2003) 21-26