Interceptive timing: Prior knowledge matters

Journal of Vision

Volumn 7, Issue 13, 2007, Pages

  López Moliner, Joan ^a   Field, David T ^b   Wann, John P ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BARCELONA   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF READING   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Cue combination; Interceptive timing; Time to contact

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; HUMAN; PERCEPTION; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; TIME; VISION;

ADULT; CUES; HUMANS; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; SIZE PERCEPTION; TIME FACTORS; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 35649021664     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15347362     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/7.13.11     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Battaglia, P. W., Schrater, P., & Kersten, D. J. (2005). Auxiliary object knowledge influences visually-guided interception behavior. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 95, 145-152.
2. Caljouw, S. R., van der Kamp, J., & Savelsbergh, G. J. (2004). Catching optical information for the regulation of timing. Experimental Brain Research, 155, 427-438.
3. DeLucia, P. R. (2005). Does binocular disparity or familiar size override effects of relative size on judgements of time to contact? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A: Human Experimental Psychology, 58, 865-886.
4. Ernst, M. O., & Banks, M. S. (2002). Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion. Nature, 415, 429-433.
5. Ernst, M. O., & Bülthoff H. H. (2004). Merging the senses into a robust percept. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 162-169.
6. Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
7. Gray, R. (2002) Behavior of college baseball players in a virtual batting task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 1131-1148.
8. Harris, J. M., & Watamaniuk, S. N. (1995). Speed discrimination of motion-in-depth using binocular cues. Vision Research, 35, 885-896.
9. Lee, D. N. (1976). A theory of visual control of braking based on information about time-to-collision. Perception, 5, 437-459.
10. Lee, D. N., & Reddish, P. E. (1981). Plummeting gannets: A paradigm of ecological optics. Nature, 293, 293-294.
11. López-Moliner, J., & Bonnet, C. (2002). Speed of response initiation in a time-to-contact discrimination task reflects the use of η. Vision Research, 42, 2419-2430.
12. Michaels, C. F., Zeinstra, E. B., & Oudejans, R. R. (2001). Information and action in punching a falling ball. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A: Human Experimental Psychology, 54, 69-93.
13. Miyazaki, M., Nozaki, D., & Nakajima, Y. (2005). Testing Bayesian models of human coincidence timing. Journal of Neurophysiology, 94, 395-399.
14. Peper, L., Bootsma, R. J., Mestre, D. R., & Bakker, F. C. (1994). Catching balls: How to get the hand to the right place at the right time. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 591-612.
15. Regan, D., & Beverley, K. I. (1979). Binocular and monocular stimuli for motion in depth: Changing-disparity and changing-size feed the same motion-in-depth stage. Vision Research, 19, 1331-1342
16. Rushton, S. K., & Wann, J. P. (1999). Weighted combination of size and disparity: A computational model for timing a ball catch. Nature Neuroscience, 2, 186-190.
17. Smith, M. R., Flach, J. M., Dittman, S. M., & Stanard, T. (2001). Monocular optical constraints on collision control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 395-410.
18. Sun, H., & Frost, B. J. (1998). Computation of different optical variables of looming objects in pigeon nucleus rotundus neurons. Nature Neuroscience, 1, 296-303.
19. Tresilian, J. R. (1999). Visually timed action: Time-out for 'tau'? Trends in Cognitive Science, 3, 301-310.
20. Tresilian, J. R., Plooy, A., & Carroll, T. J. (2004). Constraints on the spatiotemporal accuracy of interceptive action: Effects of target size on hitting a moving target. Experimental Brain Research, 155, 509-526.
21. Wann, J. P. (1996). Anticipating arrival: Is the tau-margin a specious theory? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 1031-1048.