Effectiveness of a computerised assessment tool to prompt individuals with diabetes to be more active in consultations

Practical Diabetes International

Volumn 24, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 36-41

  Barnard, Katharine D ^a   Cradock, Sue ^b,c   Parkin, Tracy ^d   Skinner, T Chas ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

^b Portsmouth City Primary Care Trust   (United Kingdom)

^c QUEEN ALEXANDRA HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY OF PLYMOUTH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Communication; Diabetes; Patient activation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; AUTOMATION; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONSULTATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HEALTH PRACTITIONER; HUMAN; INDEPENDENCE; INSULIN DEPENDENT DIABETES MELLITUS; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; INTERVIEW; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL ASSESSMENT; NON INSULIN DEPENDENT DIABETES MELLITUS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; OUTPATIENT; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PATIENT CARE; QUESTIONNAIRE; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY; TIME;

EID: 35649008447     PISSN: 13578170     EISSN: 1528252X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/pdi.1047     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. DCCT. The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. N Eng J Med 1993; 329: 977-986.
2. UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. Intensive blood glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes. UKPDS 33. Lancet 1998; 352: 837-853.
3. Morris AD, Boyle DI, McMahon AD, et al. Adherence to insulin treatment, glycaemic control and ketoacidosis in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Lancet 1997; 350: 1505-1510.
4. Donnan PT, MacDonald TM, Morris AD. Adherence to prescribed oral hypoglycaemic medication in a population of patients with Type 2 diabetes: a retrospective cohort study. Diabetic Med 2002; 19: 279-284.
5. Benner JS, Glynn RJ, Mogun H, et al. Long-term persistence in use of statin therapy in elderly patients. JAMA 2002; 288(4): 495-497.
6. Chapman RH, Benner JS, Petrilla AA, et al. Predictors of adherence with anti-hypertensive and lipid-lowering therapy. Arch Intern Med 2005; 165(10): 1147-1152.
7. Toobert DJ, Hampson SE, Glasgow RE. The summary of diabetes self-care activities measures: results from 7 studies and a revised scale. Diabetes Care 2000; 23: 943-950.
8. Murphy E, Kinmonth AL. No symptoms, no problems? Patients' understandings of non-insulin dependent diabetes. Family Pract 1995; 12: 184-192.
9. DAFNE Study Group. Training in flexible, intensive insulin management to enable dietary freedom in people with type 1 diabetes: Dose Adjustment For Normal Eating (DAFNE) randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2002; 325: 746-751.
10. Kingery PM, Glasgow RE. Self-efficacy and outcome expectations in the self-regulation of non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus. Health Education 1989; 20: 13-19.
11. Department of Health, England. The National Framework for Diabetes: Standards. London: Department of Health, 2003.
12. Norris SL, Lau J, Smith SJ, et al. Self-management education for adults with Type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis of the effect on glycaemic control. Diabetes Care 2002; 25: 1159-1171.
13. Padgett D, Mumford E, Hynes M, et al. Meta-analysis of the effects of educational and psychosocial interventions on management of diabetes mellitus. J Clin Epidemiol 1988; 41: 1007-1029.
14. Brown SA. Effects of educational interventions and outcomes in diabetes adults: a meta-analysis revisited. Patient Educ Couns 1990; 16: 189-215.
15. Skinner TC, Cradock S. Empowerment: what about the evidence? Pract Diabetes Int 2000; 17: 91-95.
16. Golin CE, DiMatteo MR, Gelberg L. The role of patient participation in the doctor visit. Implications for adherence to diabetes care. Diabetes Care 1996; 19: 1153-1164.
17. Arborelius E. Using doctor-patient communication to affect patients' lifestyles: theoretical and practical implications. Psychol Health 1996; 11: 845-855.
18. Williams GC, Rodin GC, Ryan RM, et al. Autonomous regulation and long-term medication adherence in adult outpatients. Health Psychology 1998; 17(3): 269-276.
19. Mead N, Bower P. Measuring patient-centredness as a comparison of three observation-based instruments. Patient Educ Couns 2000; 39: 71-80.
20. Michie S, Miles J, Weinman J. Patient-centredness in chronic illness: what is it and does it matter? Patient Educ Couns 2003; 51: 197-206.
21. Harrington J, Noble LM, Newman SP. Improving patients' communication with doctors: a systematic review of intervention studies. Patient Educ Couns 2004; 52: 7-16.
22. Greenfield S, Kaplan SH, Ware JE Jr, et al. Patients' participation in medical care: effects on blood sugar control and quality of life in diabetes. J Gen Intern Med 1988; 3: 448-457.
23. Griffin SJ, Kinmonth A, Veltman MWN, et al. Effect on Health Related Outcomes of Interventions to Alter the Interaction Between Patients and Practitioners: A Systematic Review of Trials. Ann Fam Med 2004; 2(6): 595-608.
24. Glasgow RE, La Chance P, Toobert DL, et al. Long-term effects and costs of a brief behavioural dietary intervention for patients with diabetes delivered from the medical office. Patient Educ Couns 1997; 32: 175-184.
25. Fisher K. Assessing psychosocial variables. A tool for diabetes educators. Diabetes Educator 2006; 32(1): 51-58.
26. Welch G, Guthrie DW. Supporting lifestyle change with a computerized psychosocial assessment tool. Diabetes Spectrum 2002; 15: 203-207.
27. Williams G, Pickup JC. Handbook of Diabetes, 2nd edn. Oxford: Blackwell Science, 2000.
28. Williams GC, Freedman ZR, Deci EL. Supporting autonomy to motivate patients with diabetes for glucose control. Diabetes Care 1998; 21: 1644-1651.
29. Parkin T, Skinner TC. Discrepancies between patient and professionals' recall and perception of an outpatient consultation. Diabetic Med 2003; 20(11): 909-914.
30. Goodchild CE, Skinner TC, Parkin T. The value of empathy in dietetic consultations. A pilot study to investigate its effect on satisfaction, autonomy and agreement. J Hum Nutr Dietet 2005; 18: 181-185.
31. Heisler M, Vijan S, Anderson RM, et al. When do patients and their physicians agree on diabetes treatment goals and strategies, and what difference does it make? J Gen Intern Med 2003; 18(11): 893-902.