Mirror gametes donation

Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volumn 28, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 187-191

  Pennings, Guido ^a  

^a GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Ethics; Fairness; Oocyte donation; Reciprocity; Sperm donation

Indexed keywords

GAMETE; HUMAN; MEDICAL ETHICS; OOCYTE DONATION; RECIPIENT; REVIEW; SOCIAL INTERACTION; SPERM DONOR;

FEMALE; HUMANS; INSEMINATION, ARTIFICIAL, HETEROLOGOUS; MALE; OOCYTE DONATION; SPERMATOZOA; TISSUE DONORS;

EID: 35649007426     PISSN: 0167482X     EISSN: 17438942     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01674820701656492     Document Type: Review

References (21)

1. Craft I, Thornhill A. Would all-inclusive compensation attract more gamete donors to balance their loss of anonymity? Reproductive BioMedicine Online 2005;10:301-306.
2. Pennings G. The loss of sperm donor candidates due to the abolition of the anonymity rule: analysis of an argument. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 2001;18:617-622.
3. Pennings G. Commentary on Craft and Thornhill: new ethical strategies to recruit gamete donors. Reproductive BioMedicine Online 2005;10:307-309.
4. Baetens P, Devroey P, Camus M, Van Steirteghem A, Ponjaert-Kristoffersen I. Counselling couples and donors for oocyte donation: the decision to use either known or anonymous oocytes. Human Reproduction 2000;15:476-484.
5. Fehrman-Ekholm I, Gabel H, Magnusson G. Reasons for not accepting living kidney donors. Transplantation 1996;61:1264-1265.
6. Sells RA. Paired-kidney-exchange programs. New England Journal of Medicine 1997;337:1392-1393.
7. Rawls J. A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press; 1971.
8. Jarvis R. Join the club: a modest proposal to increase availability of donor organs. Journal of Medical Ethics 1995;21:199-204.
9. Den Hartogh G. Gift of bijdrage? Over morele aspecten van orgaandonatie. [Gift or contribution? About moral aspects of organ donation] Rathenau Instituut, Den Haag. Studie 47;2003.
10. Buchanan A. Justice as reciprocity versus subject-centered justice. Philosophy and Public Affairs 1990;19:227-252.
11. Pennings G. Gamete donation in a system of need-adjusted reciprocity. Human Reproduction 2005;20:2990-2993.
12. Wikler D. Equity, efficacy, and the point system for transplant recipient selection. Transplantation Proceedings 1989;21:3437-3439.
13. Pennings G. Postmenopausal women and the right of access to oocyte donation. Journal of Applied Philosophy 2001;18:171-181.
14. Rimington MR, Ahuja KK, Simons EG, Bowen-Simpkins P, Nair S, Armar NA, Gill A, Arian-Schad M, Wilcox M. Should non-patient volunteers donate eggs? Reproductive BioMedicine Online 2003;6:277-280.
15. Pennings G, Devroey P. Subsidized in-vitro fertilization treatment and the effect on the number of egg sharers. Reproductive BioMedicine Online 2006;13:8-10.
16. Ahuja KK, Simons EG, Mostyn BJ, Bowen-Simpkins P. An assessment of the motives and morals of egg share donors: policy of 'payments' to egg donors requires a fair review. Human Reproduction 1998;13:2671-2678.
17. Blyth E. Patient experiences of an "egg sharing" programme. Human Fertility 2004;7:157-162.
18. Pennings G. Demanding pure motives for donation: the moral acceptability of blood donations by haemochromatosis patients. Journal of Medical Ethics 2005;31:69-72.
19. Karrfelt HME, Berg UB, Linblad FIE, Tyden GE. To be or not to be a living donor. Transplantation 1998;65:915-918.
20. Rapport F. Exploring the beliefs and experiences of potential egg share donors. Journal of Advanced Nursing 2003;43:28-42.
21. Ferraretti AP, Pennings G, Gianaroli L, Magli MC. Semen donor recruitment in an oocyte donation programme. Human Reproduction 2006;21:2482-2485.