Content literacy: Fundamental toolkit elements

Reading Teacher

Volumn 61, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 192-194

  Brozo, William G ^a   Flynt, E Sutton ^b  

^a GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MEMPHIS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 35649003154     PISSN: 00340561     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1598/RT.61.2.9     Document Type: Review

References (24)

1. Anderman, LH. (1999). Classroom goal orientation, school belonging and social goals as predictors of students' positive and negative affect following the transition to middle school. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 32, 89-103.
2. Berliner, D. (2006). Our impoverished view of educational reform. Teachers College Record, 108, 949-995.
3. Biancarosa, C., & Snow. CE. (2004). Reading next - A vision for action and research in middle and high school literacy: A report to Carnegie Corporation of New York. Washington, DC: Alliance for Excellent Education. Retrieved July 9, 2007, from www.all4ed.org/publications/ReadingNext/ ReadingNext.pdf
4. Braunger, J., Donahue, D.M., Evans, K., & Galguera, T. (2005). Rethinking preparation for content area teaching: The reading apprenticeship approach. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
5. Brozo, W.G., & Simpson, M.L. (2007). Content literacy for today's adolescents: Honoring diversity and building competence. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/ Prentice Hall.
6. Cooter, R.B., & Flynt, E.S. (1996). Teaching reading in the content areas: Developing content literacy for all students. New York: John Wiley.
7. Echevarria, J., Vogt, M.E., & Short, D. (2004). Making content comprehensible to English learners: The SIOP model. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
8. Fisher, J.B., Schumaker, J.B., & Deshler, D.D. (2002). Improving the reading comprehension of at-risk adolescents. In C.C. Block & M. Pressley (Eds.), Comprehension instruction: Research-based best practices (pp. 351-364). New York: Guilford.
9. Francis, DJ., Shaywitz, S.E., Stuebing, K.K., Shaywitz, B.A., & Fletcher, J.M. (1996). Developmental lag versus deficit models of reading disability: A longitudinal, individual growth curves analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 3-17.
10. Guthrie, J.T., & Davis, M.H. (2003). Motivating struggling readers in middle school through an engagement model of classroom practice. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 19, 59-85.
11. Guthrie, J.T., & Humenick, N.M. (2004). Motivating students to read: Evidence for classroom practices that increase reading motivation and achievement. In P. McCardle & V. Chhabra (Eds.), The voice of evidence in reading research (pp. 329-354). Baltimore: Brookes Publishing.
12. Hattie, J. (2003, October). Teachers make a difference: What is the research evidence? Paper presented at the research conference of the Australian Council for Educational Research, Melbourne, VIC, Australia. Retrieved May 22,2007, from www.acer.edu.au/ documents/RC2003_Hattie_TeachersMakeADifference. pdf
13. Hawkins, M.R. (2004). Researching English language and literacy development in schools. Educational Researcher, 33, 14-25.
14. Jiménez, R.T. (1997). The strategic reading abilities and potential of five low-literacy Latina/o readers in middle school. Reading Research Quarterly, 32, 224-243.
15. Mullis, I.V.S., Martin, M.O., Gonzalez, EJ., & Kennedy, A.M. (2003). PIRLS 2001 international report: IEA 's study of reading literacy achievement in primary schools in 35 countries. Chestnut Hill, MA: Boston College.
16. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2001). Knowledge and skills for life: First results from PISA 2000. Paris: Author.
17. Pajares, F. (1996). Self-efficacy beliefs in academic settings. Review of Educational Research, 66, 543-578.
18. Pearman, E.L., Huang, A., & Mellblom, C.I. (1997). The inclusion of all students: Concerns and incentives of educators. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 32, 11-20.
19. Perie, M., Grigg, W.S., & Donahue, P. (2005). The nation's report card: Reading 2005 (NCES 2006-451). U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
20. Pintrich, P.R., & Schunk, D.H. (2001). Motivation in education: Theory, research and applications (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.
21. Qian, D.D. (2002). Investigating the relationship between vocabulary knowledge and academic reading performance: An assessment perspective. Language Learning, 52, 513-536.
22. RAND Reading Study Group. (2002). Reading for understanding: Toward an R&D program in reading comprehension. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
23. Sadoski, M., Goetz, E.T., & Rodriguez, M. (2000). Engaging texts: Effects of concreteness comprehensibility, interest, and recall in four text types. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 85-95.
24. Shaywitz, S. (2003). Overcoming dyslexia: A new and complete science-based program for reading problems at any level. New York: Knopf.