Individual variation in agrammatism: A single case study of the influence of interaction

International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders

Volumn 42, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 629-647

  Beeke, Suzanne ^a   Wilkinson, Ray ^a   Maxim, Jane ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Agrammatism; Aphasia; Individual variation; Interaction; Qualitative analysis

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CASE REPORT; CONVERSATION; GRAMMAR; HUMAN; LINGUISTICS; MALE; NEUROPSYCHOLOGY; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; SPEECH PERCEPTION; VIDEOTAPE;

APHASIA, BROCA; FAMILY RELATIONS; HEMIPLEGIA; HUMANS; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PSYCHOLINGUISTICS; SPEECH; VOCABULARY;

EID: 35648994412     PISSN: 13682822     EISSN: 14606984     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13682820601160087     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. AUER, P., 1984, Referential problems in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 8, 627-648.
2. BASTIAANSE, R., 1995, Broca's aphasia: a syntactic and/or a morphological disorder? A case study. Brain and Language, 48, 1-32.
3. BASTIAANSE, R., EDWARDS, S. and RISPENS, J., 2002, Verb and Sentence Test (Thames Valley Test Company, Bury St. Edmunds).
4. BEEKE, S., WILKINSON, R. and MAXIM, J., 2003a, Exploring aphasic grammar 2: do language testing and conversation tell a similar story? Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 17, 109-134.
5. BEEKE, S., WILKINSON, R. and MAXIM, J., 2003b, Exploring aphasic grammar 1: a single case analysis of conversation. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 17, 81-107.
6. BEEKE, S., WILKINSON, R. and MAXIM, J., 2006, Grammar without sentence structure: a conversation analytic investigation of agrammatism. Aphasiology (in press).
7. BERNDT, R. S., HAENDIGES, A. N., MITCHUM, C. C. and SANDSON, J., 1997, Verb retrieval in aphasia 2. relationship to sentence processing. Brain and Language, 56, 107-137.
8. EDWARDS, S., 2000, A clinical assessment of verbs in an agrammatic patient. In R. Bastiaanse and Y. Grodzinsky (eds), Grammatical Disorders in Aphasia (London: Whurr), pp. 191-213.
9. FLETCHER, M. and BIRT, D., 1983, Storylines: Picture Sequences for Language Practice (London: Longman).
10. GOODGLASS, H., 1976, Agrammatism. In H. Whitaker and H. A. Whitaker (eds), Studies in Neurolinguistics, Vol. 1 (New York, NY: Academic Press).
11. GOODGLASS, H. and KAPLAN, E., 1983, The Assessment of Aphasia and Related Disorders, 2nd edn (Philadelphia, PA: Lea & Febiger).
12. GOODGLASS, H., GLEASON, J. B., BERNHOLTZ, N. A. and HYDE, M. R., 1972, Some linguistic structures in the speech of a Broca's aphasic. Cortex, 8, 191-212.
13. GOODWIN, C., 1981, Conversational Organization: Interaction between Speakers and Hearers (New York, NY: Academic Press).
14. HEESCHEN, C. and SCHEGLOFF, E., 1999, Agrammatism, adaptation theory, conversation analysis: on the role of so-called telegraphic style in talk-in-interaction. Aphasiology, 13, 365-405.
15. HEESCHEN, C. and SCHEGLOFF, E., 2003, Aphasic agrammatism as interactional artifact and achievement. In C. Goodwin (ed.), Conversation and Brain Damage (New York, NY: Oxford University Press), pp. 231-282.
16. HELASVUO, M.-L., 2001, Emerging syntax for interaction. In M. Selting and E. Couper-Kuhlen (eds), Studies in Interactional Linguistics (Amsterdam: John Benjamins), pp. 25-50.
17. HELASVUO, M.-L., KLIPPI, A. and LAAKSO, M., 2001, Grammatical structuring in Broca's and Wernicke's aphasia in Finnish. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 14, 231-254.
18. HERITAGE, J., 1984, Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology (Cambridge: Polity).
19. HOFSTEDE, B. and KOLK, H. H. J., 1994, The effects of task variation on the production of grammatical morphology in Broca's aphasia: a multiple case study. Brain and Language, 46, 278-328.
20. HUTCHBY, I. and WOOFFITT, R., 1998, Conversation Analysis (Cambridge: Polity).
21. JEFFERSON, G., 1973, A case of precision timing in ordinary conversation: overlapped, tag-positioned address terms in closing sequences. Semiotica, 9, 47-96.
22. KAY, J., LESSER, R. and COLTHEART, M., 1992, Psycholinguistic Assessments of Language Processing in Aphasia, PALPA (Hove: Lawrence Erlbaum).
23. KOLK, H., 1998, The malleability of agrammatic symptoms and its implications for therapy. In E. G. Visch-Brink and R. Bastiaanse (eds), Linguistic Levels in Aphasiology (San Diego, CA: Singular), pp. 193-209.
24. KOLK, H. and HEESCHEN, C., 1990, Adaptation symptoms and impairment symptoms in Broca's aphasia. Aphasiology, 4, 221-231.
25. KOLK, H. and HEESCHEN, C., 1992, Agrammatism, paragrammatism and the management of language. Language and Cognitive Processes, 7, 89-129.
26. LESSER, R. and MILROY, L., 1993, Linguistics and Aphasia: Psycholinguistic and Pragmatic Aspects of Intervention (London: Longman).
27. MARSHALL, J., 2002, Assessment and treatment of sentence processing disorders: a review of the literature. In A. E. Hillis (ed.), The Handbook of Adult Language Disorders: Integrating Cognitive Neuropsychology, Neurology, and Rehabilitation (New York, NY: Psychology Press), pp. 351-372.
28. MYERSON, R. and GOODGLASS, H., 1972, Transformational grammars of three agrammatic patients. Language and Speech, 15, 40-50.
29. NESPOULOUS, J.-L., CODE, C., VIRBEL, J. and LECOURS, A. R., 1998, Hypotheses on the dissociation between 'referential' and 'modalizing' verbal behaviour in aphasia. Applied Psycholinguistics, 19, 311-331.
30. OCHS, E., SCHEGLOFF, E. A. and THOMPSON, S. A. (eds), 1996, Interaction and Grammar (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
31. SACKS, H., SCHEGLOFF, E. A. and JEFFERSON, G., 1974, A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50, 696-735.
32. SALIS, C. and EDWARDS, S., 2004, Adaptation theory and non-fluent aphasia in English. Aphasiology, 18, 1103-1120.
33. SCHEGLOFF, E. A., 1979, The relevance of repair to syntax-for-conversation. In T. Givon (ed.), Syntax and Semantics 12: Discourse and Syntax (New York, NY: Academic Press), pp. 261-286.
34. SCHEGLOFF, E., 2003, Conversation analysis and communication disorders. In C. Goodwin (ed.), Conversation and Brain Damage (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 21-55.
35. SCHIFFRIN, D., 1987, Discourse Markers (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
36. SCHWARTZ, M. F., FINK, R. B. and SAFFRAN, E. M., 1995, The modular treatment of agrammatism. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 5, 93-127.
37. SPRINGER, L., HUBER, W., SCHLENCK, K. -J. and SCHLENCK, C., 2000, Agrammatism: deficit or compensation? Consequences for aphasia therapy. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 10, 279-309.
38. THOMPSON, S. A. and MULAC, A., 1991, A quantitative perspective on the grammaticization of epistemic parentheticals in English. In E. C. Traugott and B. Heine (eds), Approaches to Grammaticalization, Vol. 2: Focus on Types of Grammatical Markers (Amsterdam: John Benjamins), pp. 313-329.
39. VAN LANCKER SIDTIS, D., 2004, When novel sentences spoken or heard for the first time in the history of the universe are not enough: toward a dual-process model of language. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 39, 1-44.
40. WHITWORTH, A., 1996, Thematic Roles in Production, TRIP: An Assessment of Word Retrieval at the Sentence Level (London: Whurr).
41. WILKINSON, R., 1995, Aphasia: conversation analysis of a non-fluent aphasic person. In M. Perkins and S. Howard (eds), Case Studies in Clinical Linguistics (London: Whurr), pp. 271-292.
42. WILKINSON, R., MAXIM, J. and BEEKE, S., 2001, R000222754: An Investigation of Aphasic Syntax-for-Conversation: Final Report (London: Economic and Social Research Council). Available at: www.esrc.ac.uk
43. WRAY, A. and PERKINS, M. R., 2000, The functions of formulaic language: an integrated model. Language and Communication, 20, 1-28.