Water and globalization: Case study of Central Asia

Irrigation and Drainage

Volumn 56, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 489-507

  Dukhovny, V A ^a,b  

^a Sci Information Centre of the Interstate Coordination Water Commission of Central Asia (SIC ICWC)   (Uzbekistan)

^b ICID ^*  (Uzbekistan)

Author keywords

Central asia; Globalization; Governance; Water sector

Indexed keywords

EID: 35648992979     PISSN: 15310353     EISSN: 15310361     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ird.327     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Allan JA. 1998. Virtual water: a strategic resource, global situations to regional deficits. Groundwater 36(4): 545-546.
2. Allan JA, 2001. Virtual water - economically invisible and politically silent - a way to solve strategic water problems. International Water and Irrigation 21(4): 39-41.
3. Bigday O. 2005, Oligopolization of Agrarian Sector in USA. Russian Academy of Sciences: Moscow; 24-26.
4. Chapagain AK. 2006. Globalization of Water. PhD thesis, Technical University of Delft/UNESCO-IHE. A.A. Balkema Publishers: The Netherlands; 148.
5. Cosgrove WJ, Rijsberman FR. 2000. World Water Vision: Making Water Everybody's Business. Earthscan: London, Great Britain.
6. European Convention. 1992. UNECE Convention on the Protection and Use of Transboundary Watercourses and International Lakes. Geneva.
7. European Commission. 2000. EU Water Framework Directive, Directive 2000/60/EC, Brussels, Belgium.
8. European Union TACIS. 1997-1999. WARMAP Project. Water Use and Farm Management Survey (WUFMAS). Tashkent, Uzbekistan.
9. European Union TACIS. 1999. Water Resource Management in Aral Sea Basin (WARMAP Project), Tashkent, Uzbekistan.
10. Forrester JW. 1972. World Dynamics. Wright-Allen Press Inc.: Cambridge.
11. Gleick P, et al. 2002. Globalization and International Trade of Water. Island Press: Washington; 33-56.
12. Global Environmental Facility (GEF) Program. 1999-2000. Component A-2 "Water Environment Aral Sea Basin Program". GEF Agency.
13. Hoekstra AY, Hung IQ. 2002. Virtual Water Trade: Quantification of Virtual Water Flows between Nations. UNESCO-IHE, RRS, No. 11, Delft, the Netherlands.
14. Hohenheim University and SIC-ICWC. 2006. Rivertwin - Chirchic Project. Reports on grey papers.
15. International Law Association (ILA). 1966. Helsinki rules on the uses of the waters of international rivers. Report of the 52nd Conference, New York; 477.
16. Interstate Coordination Water Commission of Central Asia (ICWC). 1996. Key Provisions of the Aral Sea Basin Water Strategy. The Principal Provisions of Regional Water Strategy approved by the Governments of Central Asian States. Tashkent, Uzbekistan.
17. Interstate Fund of Aral Sea (IFAS). 1994. The Program of Concrete Actions on Improvement of Environment Situation in the Aral Sea Basin for the Nearest 3-5 Years Taking into Account Social and Economic Development of the Region (ASBP-I). Almaty, Kazakhstan.
18. Kavanagh T, Mander J. 2002. Alternatives to Economic Globalization: a Better World is Possible. The International Forum of Globalization, Berret-Koehler publisher: San Francisco.
19. Kyoto Protocol to the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change. 1997. New York.
20. Ministerial meeting. 2001. Bonn Conference Resolutions, Bonn, Germany.
21. Rosengrant MW, Ringler C. 1999. Impact of Food Security and Rural Development of Reallocating Water from Agriculture. International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI: Washington, DC, USA.
22. Saul JR. 2006. The Collapse of Globalization. Atlantic Books: London, Great Britain.
23. UNESCO, Office of International Standards and Legal Affairs, 1994.Convention on Wetlands of International Importance especially as Waterfowl Habitat. Paris, France.
24. United Nations Convention on International Watercourses. 1997. UN Convention on the Law of the Non Navigational Uses of International Watercourses. New York.
25. United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification in Countries Experiencing Serious Drought and/or Desertification, Particularly in Africa, 17 June 1994. New York.
26. Worner J. 2003. Virtual Waters - Virtual Benefits? Scarcity, Distribution and Conflict Reconsidered. Proceeding of UNESCO-IHE RRS, No. 12. Delft, the Netherlands.