Monophonic sound source separation with an unsupervised network of spiking neurones

Neurocomputing

Volumn 71, Issue 1-3, 2007, Pages 109-120

  Pichevar, Ramin ^a   Rouat, Jean ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE SHERBROOKE   (Canada)

Author keywords

Amplitude modulation; Auditory maps; Auditory scene analysis; Neurones; Source separation; Speech enhancement; Spikes

Indexed keywords

AMPLITUDE MODULATION; BLIND SOURCE SEPARATION; CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION); NEURONS; SPEECH ENHANCEMENT; UNSUPERVISED LEARNING;

LOG SPECTRAL DISTORTION; MONOPHONIC SOUND SOURCE SEPARATION; SPIKING NEURONES;

PATTERN RECOGNITION SYSTEMS;

ACOUSTICS; ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; AUDITORY SYSTEM; COCHLEAR NUCLEUS; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; FEMALE; FILTER; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; NOISE; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SOUND DETECTION; SPEECH; SYNAPSE; TRAINING;

EID: 35648992055     PISSN: 09252312     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neucom.2007.08.001     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Andersen R., Snyder L., Bradley D., and Xing J. Multimodal representation of space in the posterior parietal cortex and its use in planning movements. Ann. Rev. Neurosci. 20 (1997) 303
2. Atlas L., and Shamma S.A. Joint acoustic and modulation frequency. EURASIP J. Appl. Signal Process. 7 (2003) 668-675
3. Bahoura M., and Rouat J. Wavelet speech enhancement based on the teager energy operator. IEEE Signal Process. Lett. 8 (2001) 10-12
4. M. Bahoura, J. Rouat, New approach for wavelet speech enhancement, Eurospeech 2001, Danemark, 2001, pp. 1937-1940.
5. F. Berthommier, G. Meyer, Improving of amplitude modulation maps for f0-dependent segregation of harmonic sounds, in: Eurospeech'97, 1997.
6. Bohte S.M., Poutré H.L., and Kok J.N. Unsupervised clustering with spiking neurons by sparse temporal coding and multilayer RBF networks. IEEE Trans. Neural Networks 13 2 (2002) 426-435
7. Bregman A. Auditory Scene Analysis (1990), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
8. Brown G., and Cooke M. Computational auditory scene analaysis. Comput. Speech Language (1994) 297-336
9. M. Cooke, Modelling auditory processing and organisation, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Sheffield (published in the Distinguished Dissertations in Computer Science Series, University of Cambridge Press, paper back, 2005).
10. M. Cooke, 〈http://www.dcs.shef.ac.uk/∼martin/〉, 2004.
11. Cooke M., and Ellis D. The auditory organization of speech and other sources in listeners and computational models. Speech Commun. (2001) 141-177
12. Cooke M., Green P., Josifovski L., and Vizinho A. Robust automatic speech recognition with missing and unreliable acoustic data. Speech Commun. 34 (2001) 267-285
13. D. Ellis, Prediction-driven computational auditory scene analysis, Ph.D. Thesis, MIT, 1996.
14. Gabbiani F., Krapp H., Koch C., and Laurent G. Multiplicative computation in a visual neuron sensitive to looming. Nature 420 (2002) 320-324
15. F. Gaillard, Analyse de scènes auditives computationnelle (CASA): Un nouvel outil de marquage du plan temps-fréquence par détection d'harmonicité exploitant une statistique de passage par zéro, Ph.D. Thesis, INPG, 1999.
16. Gerstner W. Spiking neuron models: single neurons, populations, plasticity (2002), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
17. Giguere C., and Woodland P.C. A computational model of the auditory periphery for speech and hearing research. J. Am. Statist. Assoc. (1994) 331-349
18. S. Grossberg, K. Govindarajan, L. Wyse, M. Cohen, M. ARTSTREAM: a neural network model of auditory scene analysis and source segregation, Neural Networks, 2003.
19. S. Harding, G. Meyer, Multi-resolution auditory scene analysis: robust speech recognition using pattern-matching from a noisy signal, In: EUROSPEECH, September 2003, pp. 2109-2112.
20. C.K. Henkel, The auditory system, in: D.E. Haines (Ed.), Fundamental Neuroscience, Churchill Livingstone, 1997.
21. Hopfield J. Pattern recognition computation using action potential timing for stimulus representation. Nature 376 (1995) 33-36
22. G. Hu, D. Wang, Monaural speech segregation based on pitch tracking and amplitude modulation, Technical Report, Ohio State University, 2002.
23. G. Hu, D. Wang, Separation of stop consonants, in: ICASSP Hong Kong, 2003.
24. Hu G., and Wang D. Monaural speech segregation based on pitch tracking and amplitude modulation. IEEE Trans. Neural Networks 15 (2004) 1135-1150
25. T. Irino, R. Patterson, Speech segregation using event synchronous auditory vocoder, in: ICASSP, 2003, vol. V, pp. 525-528.
26. T. Irino, M. Unoki, A time-varying, analysis/synthesis auditory filterbank using the gammachirp, in: Proceedings of the International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (ICASSP) 98, May 1998, Seattle, Washington, vol. 6, pp. 3653-3656.
27. Jang G., and Lee T. Single-channel signal separation using time-domain basis functions. IEEE-SPL (2003) 168-171
28. Jang G., and Lee T. A maximum likelihood approach to single channel source separation. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 4 (2003) 1365-1392
29. Kim S., Frisina D.R., and Frisina R.D. Effects of age on contralateral suppression of distorsion product otoacoustic emissions in human listeners with normal hearing. Audiol. Neuro Otol. 7 (2002) 348-357
30. Kouwe A.J.W., Wang D.L., and Brown G.J. A comparison of auditory and blind separation techniques for speech segregation. IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process. 9 (2001) 189-195
31. G. Kubin, W.B. Kleijn, On speech coding in a perceptual domain, in: ICASSP, March 1999, Phoenix, Arizona, vol. 1, pp. 205-208.
32. Levy N., Horn D., Meilijson I., and Ruppin E. Distributed synchrony in a cell assembly of piking neurons. Neural Networks 14 6-7 (2001) 815-824
33. Liberman M., Puria S., and Guinan J.J. The ipsilaterally evoked olivocochlearreflex causes rapid adaptation of the 2f1-f2 distortion product otoacoustic emission. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 99 (1996) 2572-3584
34. C. von der Malsburg, 1981. The correlation theory of brain function, Technical Report Internal Report 81-2, Max-Planck Institute for Biophysical Chemistry.
35. von der Malsburg C. The what and why of binding: the modeler's perspective. Neuron (1999) 95-104
36. von der Malsburg C., and Schneider W. A neural cocktail-party processor. Biol. Cybern. (1986) 29-40
37. Mellinger D.K., and Mont-Reynaud B.M. Scene analysis. In: Hawkins H., McMullen T., Popper A., and Fay R. (Eds). Auditory Computation (1996), Springer, New York 271-331
38. G. Meyer, D. Yang, W. Ainsworth, in: Applying a model of concurrent vowel segregation to real speech, Computational models of auditory function, S. Greenberg, M. Slaney (Eds.), 2001, pp. 297-310.
39. Milner P. A model for visual shape recognition. Psychol. Rev. 81 (1974) 521-535
40. J. Nix, M. Kleinschmidt, V. Hohmann, Computational auditory scene analysis by using statistics of high-dimensional speech dynamics and sound source direction, in: EUROSPEECH, September 2003, pp. 1441-1444.
41. Patterson R., Robinson K., Holdsworth J., McKeown D., Zhang C., and Allerhand M. Complex sounds and auditory images. In: Cazals Y., Demany L., and Horner K. (Eds). Auditory Physiology and Perception (1992), Pergamon Press, Oxford 429-446
42. Pena J., and Konishi M. Auditory spatial receptive fields created by multiplication. Science 292 (2001) 249-252
43. R. Pichevar, 〈http://www-edu.gel.usherbrooke.ca/picr1601/〉 2007.
44. R. Pichevar, J. Rouat, Cochleotopic/AMtopic (CAM) and Cochleotopic/Spectrotopic (CSM) map based sound source separation using relaxation oscillatory neurons, in: IEEE Neural Networks for Signal Processing Workshop, Toulouse, France, 2003.
45. R. Pichevar, J. Rouat, A quantitative evaluation of a bio-inspired sound segregation technique for two- and three-source mixtures sounds, in: Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer, Berlin, 2004, vol. 3445, pp. 430-435.
46. R. Pichevar, J. Rouat, C. Feldbauer, G. Kubin, A bio-inspired sound source separation technique in combination with an enhanced FIR gammatone analysis/synthesis filterbank, in: EUSIPCO Vienna, 2004.
47. Plante F., Meyer G., and Ainsworth W. Improvement of speech spectrogram accuracy by the method of reassignment. IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process. (1998) 282-287
48. M.J. Reyes-Gomez, B. Raj, D. Ellis, Multi-channel source separation by factorial HMMs, in: ICASSP, 2003.
49. Riesenhuber M., and Poggio T. Are cortical models really bound by the binding problem?. Neuron 84 (1999) 87-93
50. Roman N., Wang D., and Brown G. Speech segregation based on sound localization. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (2003)
51. D.F. Rosenthal, H.G. Okuno (Eds.), 1998. Computational Auditory Scene Analysis, L. Erlbaum.
52. J. Rouat, 〈http://www.gel.usherbrooke.ca/rouat/〉 2005.
53. Rouat J., Liu Y.C., and Morissette D. A pitch determination and voiced/unvoiced decision algorithm for noisy speech. Speech Commun. 21 (1997) 191-207
54. J. Rouat, R. Pichevar, Source separation with one ear: proposition for an anthropomorphic approach, EURASIP J. Appl. Signal Process. (9) (2005) 1365-1374.
55. S. Roweis, Factorial models and refiltering for speech separation and denoising, in: Eurospeech 2003.
56. S.T. Roweis, One microphone source seperation, in: NIPS, Denver, USA, 2000.
57. Sameti H., Sheikhzadeh H., Deng L., and Brennan R. HMM based strategies for enhancement of speech signals embedded in nonstationary noise. IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process. (1998) 445-455
58. J.L. Schwartz, P. Escudier, Auditory processing in a post-cochlear neural network: vowel spectrum processing based on spike synchrony, in: EUROSPEECH, 1989, pp. 247-253.
59. P. Tang, J. Rouat, Modeling neurons in the anteroventral cochlear nucleus for amplitude modulation (AM) processing: application to speech sound, in: Proceedings of the International Conference on Spoken Language Processing, October 1996, p. Th.P.2S2.2.
60. Todd N. An auditory cortical theory of auditory stream segregation. Network Comput. Neural Syst. 7 (1996) 349-356
61. J.-M. Valin, F. Michaud, J. Rouat, D. Ltourneau, Robust sound source localization using a microphone array on a mobile robot, in: IEEE/RSJ-International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, October 2003.
62. J.-M. Valin, J. Rouat, F. Michaud, Microphone array post-filter for separation of simultaneous non-stationary sources, in: IEEE International Conference on Acoustics Speech Signal Processing, 2004.
63. Wang D., and Brown G.J. Separation of speech from interfering sounds based on oscillatory correlation. IEEE Trans. Neural Networks 10 3 (1999) 684-697
64. Wang D., and Terman D. Image segmentation based on oscillatory correlation. Neural Comput. 9 (1997) 805-836
65. M. Weintraub, A theory and computational model of auditory monaural sound separation, Ph.D. Thesis, Stanford, 1985.