Preferences for involvement in treatment decision-making among Norwegian women with urinary incontinence

Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica

Volumn 86, Issue 11, 2007, Pages 1370-1376

  O'Donnell, Máire ^a   Hunskaar, Steinar ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BERGEN   (Norway)

Author keywords

Decisional preferences; Norway; Treatment decision making; Urinary incontinence

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION MAKING; EDUCATION; FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; NORWAY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RATING SCALE; SOCIOECONOMICS; TELEPHONE; URINE INCONTINENCE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGE FACTORS; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; FEMALE; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HEALTH STATUS; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; NORWAY; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PATIENT SATISFACTION; ROLE; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS; URINARY INCONTINENCE;

EID: 35648985745     PISSN: 00016349     EISSN: 16000412     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00016340701622310     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Hunskaar S, Arnold EP, Burgio K, Diokno AC, Herzog AR, Mallett VT. Epidemiology and natural history of urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J. 2000;11:301-19.
2. Hannestad YS, Rortveit G, Sandvik H, Hunskaar S. A community-based epidemiological survey of female urinary incontinence: The Norwegian EPICONT Study. J Clin Epidemiol. 2000;53:1150-7.
3. Hunskaar S, Vinsnes A. The quality of life in women with urinary incontinence as measured by the sickness impact profile. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1991;39:378-82.
4. Sandvik H, Kveine E, Hunskaar S. Female urinary incontinence - psychosocial impact, self-care, and consultations. Scand J Caring Sci. 1993;7:53-6.
5. Wyman JF, Harkins SW, Choi SC, Taylor JR, Fantl JA. Psychosocial impact of urinary incontinence in women. Obstet Gynecol. 1987;70:378-81.
6. Hannestad YS, Rortveit G, Hunskaar S. Help-seeking and associated factors in female urinary incontinence. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2002;20:102-7.
7. Davison BJ, Parker PA, Goldenberg SL. Patients' preferences for communicating a prostate cancer diagnosis and participating in medical decision-making. BJU Int. 2004;93:47-51.
8. Degner LF, Kristjanson LJ, Bowman D, Sloan JA, Carriere KC, O'Neil J, et al. Information needs and decisional preferences for women with breast cancer. JAMA. 1997;277:1485-92.
9. Beaver K, Luker KA, Owens RG, Leinster SJ, Degner LF, Sloan JA. Treatment decision-making in women newly diagnosed with breast cancer. Cancer Nurs. 1996;9:8-19.
10. Degner LF, Sloan JA. Decision-making during serious illness: what role do patients really want to play? J Clin Epidemiol. 1992;45:941-50.
11. Hack TF, Degner LF, Watson P, Sinha L. Do patients benefit from participating in medical decision-making? Longitudinal follow-up of women with breast cancer. Psychooncology. 2006;15:9-19.
12. Hack TF, Degner LF, Dyck DG. Relationship between preferences for decisional control and illnesss information among women with breast cancer: a quantitative and qualitative analysis. Soc Sci Med. 1994;39:279-89.
13. Barry B, Henderson A. Nature of decision-making in the terminally ill patient. Cancer Nurs. 1996;19:384-91.
14. Davison BJ, Degner LF. Empowerment of men newly diagnosed with prostate cancer. Cancer Nurs. 1997;20: 187-96.
15. Bradley JG, Zia MJ, Hamilton N. Patient preferences for control in medical decision-making: a scenario-based approach. Fam Med. 1996;28:496-501.
16. Roe B. Effective and ineffective management of incontinence: issues around illness trajectory and health care. Q Health Res. 2000;10:677-90.
17. Abrams P, Cardozo L, Fall M, Griffiths D, Rosier P, Ulmsten U, et al. The standardization of terminology of lower urinary tract function: Report from the standardization sub-committee of the International Continence Society. Neurourol Urodyn. 2002;21:167-78.
18. Sandvik H, Seim A, Vanvik A, Hunskaar S. A severity index for epidemiological surveys of female urinary incontinence: comparison with 48 hour pad-weighing tests. Neurourol Urodyn. 2000;19:137-45.
19. Degner LF, Sloan JA, Venkatesh P. The Control Preferences Scale. Can J Nurs Res. 1997;29:21-43.
20. O'Donnell M, Monz B, Hunskaar S. General preferences for involvement in treatment decision-making among European women consulting for urinary incontinence. Soc Sci Med. 2007;64:1914-24.
21. Mansell D, Poses RM, Kazis L, Duefield CA. Clinical factors that influence patients' desire for participation in decisions about illness. Arch Intern Med. 2000;160:2991-6.
22. O'Donnell M, Hunskaar S. Preferences for involvement in treatment decision-making generally and in hormone replacement and urinary incontinence treatment decision-making specifically. Patient Educ Couns (in press).