First-order and second-order statistical analysis of 3d and 2d image structure

Network: Computation in Neural Systems

Volumn 18, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 129-160

  Kalkan, S ^a   Worgotter F ^a   Kurger N ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GÖTTINGEN   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN DENMARK   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Natural scenes; Visual system

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; DEPTH PERCEPTION; HUMAN; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

DEPTH PERCEPTION; HUMANS; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; NEURAL NETWORKS (COMPUTER);

EID: 35648984136     PISSN: 0954898X     EISSN: 13616536     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09548980701580444     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Anderson BL, Singh M, Fleming RW. 2002. The interpolation of object and surface structure. Cognitive Psychology 44(43):148-190.
2. Barrow HG, Tenenbaum JM. 1981. Interpreting line drawings as three-dimensional surfaces. Artificial Intelligence 17:75-116.
3. Bolle RM, Vemuri BC. 1991. On three-dimensional surface reconstruction methods. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 13(1):1-13.
4. Bruce V, Green PR, Georgeson MA. 2003. Visual perception: Physiology, psychology and ecology. 4th ed. East Sussex, UK: Psychology Press.
5. Brunswik E, Kamiya J. 1953. Ecological cue-validity of proximity and of other Gestalt factors. American Journal of Psychologie, LXVI:20-32.
6. Collett TS. 1985. Extrapolating and Interpolating Surfaces in Depth. Royal Society of London Proceedings Series B 224:43-56.
7. Coxeter H. 1969. Introduction to geometry. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley & Sons.
8. Elder H, Goldberg R. 2002. Ecological statistics of gestalt laws for the perceptual organization of contours. Journal of Vision 2(4):324-353.
9. Elder JH, Krupnik A, Johnston LA. 2003. Contour grouping with prior models. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 25(25):1-14.
10. Felsberg M, Krüger N. 2003. A probablistic definition of intrinsic dimensionality for images. Pattern Recognition, 24th DAGM Symposium. Springer Berlin/Heidelberg.
11. Field DJ, Hayes A, Hess RF. 1993. Contour integration by the human visual system: Evidence for a local association field. Vision Research 33(2):173-193.
12. Gallant JL, Essen DCV, Nothdurft HC. 1994. Early vision and beyond, chapter: Two-dimensional and three-dimensional texture processing in visual cortex of the macaque monkey. MA: MIT Press. pp 89-98.
13. Grimson WEL. 1982. A computational theory of visual surface interpolation. Royal Society of London Philosophical Transactions Series B 298:395-427.
14. Grimson WEL. 1983. Surface consistency constraints in vision. Computer Vision, Graphics and Image Processing 24(1):28-51.
15. Guzman A. 1968. Decomposition of a visual scene into three-dimensional bodies. AFIPS Fall Joint Conference Proceedings 33:291-304.
16. Hoover A, Jean-Baptiste G, Jiang X, Flynn PJ, Bunke H, Goldgof DB, Bowyer K, Eggert DW, Fitzgibbon A, Fisher RB. 1996. An experimental comparison of range image segmentation algorithms. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 18(7):673-689.
17. Howe CQ, Purves D. 2002. Range image statistics can explain the anomalous perception of length. PNAS 99(20): 13184-13188.
18. Howe CQ, Purves D. 2004. Size contrast and assimilation explained by the statistics of natural scene geometry. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 16(1):90-102.
19. Huang J, Lee AB, Mumford D. 2000. Statistics of range images. CVPR 1(1):1324-1331.
20. Hubel D, Wiesel T. 1969. Anatomical demonstration of columns in the monkey striate cortex. Nature 221:747-750.
21. Kalkan S, Calow D, Wörgötter F, Lappe M, Krüger N. 2005. Local image structures and optic flow estimation. Network: Computation in Neural Systems 16(4):341-356.
22. Kalkan S, Wörgötter F, Krüger N. 2006. Statistical analysis of local 3d structure in 2d images. CVPR 1:1114-1121.
23. Kalkan S, Wörgötter F, Krüger N. 2007. Statistical analysis of second-order relations of 3d structures. Int. Conference on Computer Vision Theory and Applications (VISAPP), Barcelona, Spain.
24. Kellman P, Arterberry M, editors. 1998. The cradle of knowledge. Cambridge, Mass: MIT-Press.
25. Knill DC, Richards W, editors. 1996. Perception as bayesian inference. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
26. Koenderink J, Dorn A. 1982. The shape of smooth objects and the way contours end. Perception 11:129-173.
27. Krueger N. 1998. Collinearity and parallelism are statistically significant second order relations of complex cell responses. Neural Processing Letters 8(2):117-129.
28. Krüger N, Felsberg M. 2003. A continuous formulation of intrinsic dimension. Proceedings of the British Machine Vision Conference, Norwich, UK.
29. Krüger N, Lappe M, Wörgötter F. 2003. Biologically motivated multi-modal processing of visual primitives. Proc. the AISB 2003 Symposium on Biologically inspired Machine Vision, Theory and Application, Wales, pp 53-59.