High-resolution computed tomography with single-slice computed tomography and 16-channel multidetector computed tomography: A comparison regarding visibility and motion artifacts

Acta Radiologica

Volumn 48, Issue 9, 2007, Pages 956-961

  Vikgren, J ^a   Bath M ^a   Johnsson, A A ^a   Flinck, A ^a   Milde, H ^a   Thilander Klang, A ^a   Kheddache, S ^a  

^a SAHLGRENSKA UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

Author keywords

CT technique; High resolution CT; Lung structures; Thorax

Indexed keywords

CHANNEL CAPACITY; DATA ACQUISITION; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE QUALITY; PULMONARY DISEASES;

CHANNEL MULTIDETECTOR; HIGH RESOLUTION COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; MOTION ARTIFACTS;

COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ARTIFACT; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERSTITIAL LUNG DISEASE; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; MOTION; OBSERVER VARIATION; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RADIOGRAPHY; SPIRAL COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY;

ADULT; AGED; ARTIFACTS; FEMALE; HUMANS; LUNG DISEASES, INTERSTITIAL; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOTION; OBSERVER VARIATION; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; TOMOGRAPHY, SPIRAL COMPUTED; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 35648980603     PISSN: 02841851     EISSN: 16000455     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02841850701545813     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Aziz ZA, Wells AU, Bateman ED, Copley SJ, Desai SR, Grutters JC, et al. Interstitial lung disease: effects of thin-section CT on clinical decision making. Radiology 2006;238:725-33.
2. Beigelman-Aubry C, Hill C, Guibal A, Savatovsky J, Grenier PA. Multi-detector row CT and postprocessing techniques in the assessment of diffuse lung disease. Radiographics 2005;25:1639-52.
3. Börjesson S, Håkansson M, Båth M, Kheddache S, Svensson S, Tingberg A, et al. A software tool for increased efficiency in observer performance studies in radiology. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 2005;114:45-52.
4. European Commission, European guidelines on quality criteria for computed tomography. Report, 1996:EUR 16262 EN. Luxembourg: Commission of the European Communities.
5. Kelly DM, Hasegawa I, Borders R, Hatabu H, Boiselle PM. High-resolution CT using MDCT: comparison of degree of motion artifact between volumetric and axial methods. Am J Roentgenol 2004;182:757-9.
6. NEMA. Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) part 14: grayscale display and standard function. Tech. Rep.; 2004:PS 3.14. Rosslyn, VA: National Electrical Manufacturers Association.
7. Remy-Jardin M, Remy J, Deffontaines C, Duhamel A. Assessment of diffuse infiltrative lung disease: comparison of conventional CT and high-resolution CT. Radiology 1991;181:157-62.
8. Schoepf UJ, Becker CR, Bruening RD, Helmberger T, Staebler A, Leimeister P, et al. Electrocardiographically gated thin-section CT of the lung. Radiology 1999;212:649-54.
9. Schoepf UJ, Bruening RD, Hong C, Eibel R, Aydemir S, Crispin A, et al. Multislice helical CT of focal and diffuse lung disease: comprehensive diagnosis with reconstruction of contiguous and high-resolution CT sections from a single thin-collimation scan. Am J Roentgenol 2001;177:179-84.
10. Studier U, Gluecker T, Bongartz G, Roth J, Steinbrich W. Image quality from high-resolution CT of the lung: comparison of axial scans and of sections reconstructed from volumetric data acquired using MDCT. Am J Roentgenol 2005;185:602-7.