Finessing and hybridizing: Innovative literacy practices in reading first classrooms

Reading Teacher

Volumn 61, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 146-154

  Kersten, Jodene ^a   Pardo, Laura ^b  

^a CALIFORNIA STATE POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b HOPE COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 35648977151     PISSN: 00340561     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1598/RT.61.2.4     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Bisplinghoff, B.S. (2002). Teacher planning as responsible resistance. Language Arts, 80, 119-128.
2. Britzman, D.P. (2003). Practice makes practice: A critical study of learning to teach. Albany: State University of New York Press.
3. Coburn, C.E. (2001). Collective sensemaking about reading: How teachers mediate reading policy in their professional communities. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 23, 145-170.
4. Cohen, D.K. (1990). A revolution in one classroom: The case of Mrs. Oublier. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 12, 311-329.
5. Cohen, D.K., & Ball, D.L. (1990). Relations between policy and practice: A commentary. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 12, 331-338.
6. Coles, G. (2003). Reading the naked truth: Literacy, legislation, and lies. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
7. Delpit, L. (1995). Other people's children: Cultural conflict in the classroom. New York: New Press.
8. Florio-Ruane, S. (2002). More light: An argument for complexity in studies of teaching and teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 53, 205-215.
9. Holdzkom, D. (2001). Low performing schools: So you've identified them-now what? Charleston, WV: Appalachia Educational Laboratory.
10. Kersten, J. (2006). Hybridization, resistance, and compliance: Negotiating policies to support literacy achievement. The New Educator, 2(2), 1-20.
11. Lampert, M. (1985). How do teachers manage to teach? Perspectives on problems in practice. Harvard Education Review, 55, 178-194.
12. Lanier, J.E., & Little, J.W. (1986). Research on teacher education. In M.C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 527-569). New York: Macmillan.
13. Lashway, L. (2003). The mandate to help low-performing schools. Eugene, OR: ERIC Clearinghouse on Educational Management.
14. Luke, A. (2000). Critical literacy in Australia: A matter of context and standpoint. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 43, 448-461.
15. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel. Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction (NIH Publication No. 00-4769). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
16. Nieto, S. (1999). The light in their eyes: Creating multicultural learning communities. New York: Teachers College Press.
17. Pardo, L. (2005). Beginning teachers learn to teach writing: Finessing teaching context shapes evolving practice. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI.
18. Routman, R. (1996). Literacy at the crossroads: Critical talk about reading, writing, and other teaching dilemmas. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
19. Smagorinsky, P., Lakly, A., & Johnson, T.S. (2002). Acquiescence, accommodation, and resistance in learning to teach within a prescribed curriculum. English Education, 34, 187-213.
20. Symonds, K.W. (2003). Literacy coaching: How school districts can support a long-term strategy in a short-term world. San Francisco: Bay Area School Reform Collaborative.
21. Taylor, D. (1998). Beginning to read and the spin doctors of science: The political campaign to change America's mind about how children learn to read. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
22. Tyack, D., & Cuban, L. (1995). Tinkering toward Utopia: A century of public school reform. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.