Identifying potential biomarkers in LC-MS data

Journal of Chemometrics

Volumn 21, Issue 7-9, 2007, Pages 292-302

  Daszykowski, M ^a   Wu, W ^b   Nicholls, A W ^b   Ball, R J ^b   Czekaj, T ^a   Walczak, B ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SILESIA   (Poland)

^b GLAXOSMITHKLINE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Background removal; Noise reduction; UVE PLS; Variable selection

Indexed keywords

BIOMARKERS; LEAST SQUARES APPROXIMATIONS; LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY; MASS SPECTROMETRY; MONTE CARLO METHODS;

BACKGROUND REMOVAL; CHEMOMETRIC ANALYSIS; DATA ORGANIZATION; MASS SPECTROMETRY DATA; MONTE CARLO APPROACH; PARTIAL LEAST-SQUARES; PARTIAL LEAST-SQUARES METHOD; UNINFORMATIVE VARIABLE ELIMINATION-PARTIAL LEAST SQUARE; UNINFORMATIVE VARIABLE ELIMINATIONS; VARIABLES SELECTIONS;

NOISE ABATEMENT;

EID: 35648974371     PISSN: 08869383     EISSN: 1099128X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/cem.1066     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Listgarten J, Emili A. Statistical and computational methods for comparative proteomic profiling using liquid chromatography - tandem mass spectrometry. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2005; 4: 419-434.
2. Available from http://www.waters.com/WatersDivision/pdfs/720001056EN.pdf
3. Idborg H, Zamani L, Edlund P-O, Schuppe-Koistinen I, Jacobsson SP. Metabolic fingerprinting of rat urine by LC/MS. Part 2. Data pretreatment methods for handling of complex data. J. Chromatogr. B 2005; 828: 14-20.
4. Idborg-Björkman H, Edlund P-O, Kvalheim OM, Schuppe- Koistinen, Jacobsson PJ. Screening of biomarkers in rat urine using LC/electrospray ionization-MS and two way data analysis. Anal. Chem. 2003; 75: 4784-4792.
5. Jonsson P, Bruce SJ, Moritz T, Trygg J, Sjöström M, Plumb R, Granger J, Maibaum E, Nicholson JK, Holmes E, Antti H. Extraction, interpretation and validation of information for comparing samples in metabolic LC/MS data sets. Analyst 2005; 130: 701-707.
6. Karjalainen EJ. The spectrum reconstruction problem. Use of alternating regression for unexpected components in two-dimensional spectroscopies. Chemometr. Intell. Lab. Syst. 1989; 7: 31-38.
7. Barker M, Rayens W. Partial least squares for discrimination. J. Chemometr. 2003; 17: 166-173.
8. Idborg H, Edlund PO, Jacobsson SP. Multivariate approaches for efficient detection of potential metabolites from liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry data. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 2004; 18: 944-954.
9. Bylund D, Danielsson R, Malmquist G, Markides KE. Chromatographic alignment by warping and dynamic programming as a pre-processing tool for PARAFAC modelling of liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry data. J. Chromatogr. A 2002; 961: 237-244.
10. Samskog J, Bylund D, Jacobsson SP, Markides KE. Miniaturized on-line proteolysis-capillary liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry for peptide mapping of lactate dehydrogenase. J. Chromatogr. A 2003; 998: 83-91.
11. Storey JD, Tibshirani R. Statistical significance for genome-wide studies. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2003; 100: 9440-9445.
12. Wagner M, Naik D, Pothen A. Protocols for disease classification from mass spectrometry data. Proteomics 2003; 3: 1692-1698.
13. Breiman L, Friedman JH, Olshen RA, Stone CG. Classification and Regression Trees. Wadsworth International Group: Belmont, CA, 1984.
14. Lucasius CB, Kateman G. Genetic algorithms for large-scale optimization in chemometrics: an application. Trends Anal. Chem. 1991; 10: 254-281.
15. Leardi R. Genetic algorithms in chemometrics and chemistry: a review. J. Chemometr. 2001; 15: 559-569.
16. Petricoin EF, Ardekani AM, Hitt BA, Levine PJ, Fusaro VA, Steinberg SM, Mills GB, Simone C, Fishman DA, Kohn EC, Liotta LA. Use of proteomic patters in serum to identify ovarian cancer. Lancet 2002; 359: 572-577.
17. Baggerly KA, Morris JA, Wang J, Gold D, Xiao LC, Coombes KR. A comprehensive approach to the analysis of matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization-time of flight proteomics spectra from serum samples. Proteomics 2003; 3: 1667-1672.
18. Li T, Tanh H, Wu Z, Gong J, Gruidl M, Zou J, Tockman M, Clark RA. Data mining techniques for cancer detection using serum proteomic profiling. Artiff. Intell. Med. 2004; 32: 71-83.
19. Centner V, Massart DL, de Noord OE, de Jong S, Vandeginste B, Sterna C. Elimination of uninformative variables for multivariate calibration. Anal. Chem. 1996; 68: 3851-3858.
20. Vandeginste BGM, Massart DL, Buydens LMC, de Jong S, Lewi PJ, Smeyers-Verbeke J. Handbook of Chemometrics and Qualimetrics, Part B. Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1998.
21. Frosch Møller S, von Frese J, Bro R. Robust methods for multivariate data analysis. J. Chemometr. 2005; 19: 549-563.
22. Rousseeuw PJ, Croux C. Alternatives to median absolute deviation. J. Amer. Stat. Assoc. 1993; 88: 1273-1283.
23. Nielsen N-PV, Carstensen JM, Smedsgaard J. Aligning of single and multiple wavelength chromatographic profiles for chemometric data analysis using correlation optimised warping. J. Chromatogr. A 1998; 805: 17-35.
24. Kennard RW, Stone LA. Computer aided design of experiments. Technometrics 1969; 11: 137-148.
25. Barnes RJ, Dhanoa MS, Lister SJ. Standard normal variate transformation and de-trending of near-infrared diffuse reflectance spectra. Appl. Spectrosc. 1989; 43: 772-777.