Level of satisfaction in patients with maxillary full-arch fixed prostheses: Zygomatic versus conventional implants

International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants

Volumn 22, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 769-773

  Peñarrocha, Miguel ^a,b   Carrillo, Celia ^a   Boronat, Araceli ^a   Martí, Eva ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VALENCIA   (Spain)

^b Medical and Dental School ^*  (Spain)

Author keywords

Patient satisfaction; Zygomatic implants

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL CARE; DENTURE; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; MALE; MASTICATION; MAXILLA; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; MOUTH HYGIENE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; SELF CONCEPT; SPEECH; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TOOTH PROSTHESIS; ZYGOMA;

ADULT; AGED; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; DENTAL IMPLANTATION, ENDOSSEOUS; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; DENTAL PROSTHESIS, IMPLANT-SUPPORTED; DENTURE DESIGN; DENTURE RETENTION; DENTURE, COMPLETE, UPPER; ESTHETICS, DENTAL; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MALE; MASTICATION; MAXILLA; MIDDLE AGED; ORAL HYGIENE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; SELF CONCEPT; SPEECH; ZYGOMA;

EID: 35648967076     PISSN: 08822786     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Sorní M, Guarinos J, García O, Peñarrocha M. Implant rehabilitation of the atrophic upper jaw: A review of the literature since 1999. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2005;10:45-56.
2. Malevez C, Abarca M, Durdu F, Daelemans P.Clinical outcome of 103 consecutive zygomatic implants: 6-48 months follow-up study.Clin Oral Implants Res 2004;15:18-22.
3. Aparicio C, Brånemark P-I, Keller EE,Olive J. Reconstruction of the premaxilla with autogenous iliac bone in combination with osseointegrated implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1993;8:61-67.
4. Bedrossian E, Stumpel III L. Immediate stabilization at stage II of zygomatic implants: Rationale and technique. J Prosthet Dent 2001;86:10-14.
5. Stella J, Warner M. Sinus slot technique for simplification and improved orientation of zygomaticus dental implants: A technical note. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000;15:889-893.
6. Boyes-Varley J, Howes D, Lownie J, Blackbeard G.Surgical modifications to the Brånemark zygomaticus protocol in the treatment of the severely resorbed maxilla: A clinical report. Int J Oral Maxillofacial Implants 2003;18:232-237.
7. The Zygomaticus Fixture:Clinical Procedures Nobel Biocare. Goteborg, Sweden: 1998.
8. Kronstrom M,Trulsson M, Soderfeldt B. Patient evaluation of treatment with fixed prostheses supported by implants or a combination of teeth and implants. J Prosthodont 2004;13:160-165.
9. Sonoyama W, Kuboki T, Okamoto S, et al. Quality of life assessment in patients with implant-supported and resin-bonded fixed prosthesis for bounded edentulous spaces. Clin Oral Implants Res 2002;13:359-364.
10. De Bruyn H, Collaert B, Linden U, Bjorn AL. Patient's opinion and treatment outcome of fixed rehabilitation on Brånemark implants. A 3-year follow-up study in private dental practices. Clin Oral Implants Res 1997;8:265-271.
11. Heydecke G, Boudrias P, Awad MA, De Albuquerque RF, Lund JP, Feine JS. Within-subject comparisons of maxillary fixed and removable implant prostheses: Patient satisfaction and choice of prosthesis. Clin Oral Implants Res 2003;14:125-130.
12. Landes CA. Zygoma implant-supported midfacial prosthetic rehabilitation: A 4-year follow-up study including assessment of quality of life. Clin Oral Implant Res 2005;16:313-325.
13. Nakai H,Okazaki Y, Ueda M. Clinical application of zygomatic implants for rehabilitation of the severely resorbed maxilla: A clinical report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003;18:566-570.
14. Hirsch J, Ohrnell L, Henry P, et al. A clinical evaluation of the zygoma fixture: One year of follow-up at 16 clinics. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2004;62:22-29.
15. Farzad P, Andersson L, Gunnarsson S, Johansson B. Rehabilitation of severely resorbed maxillae with zygomatic implants: An evaluation of implant stability, tissue conditions, and patients'opinion before and after treatment. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2006;21:399-404.
16. Pjetursson BE,Karoussis I, Burgin W, Bragger U, Lang NP. Patients'satisfaction following implant therapy. A 10-year prospective cohort study.Clin Oral Implants Res 2005;16:185-193.
17. MacEntee MI, Walton JN, Glick N. A clinical trial of patient satisfaction and prosthodontic needs with ball and bar attachments for implant-retained complete overdentures:Three-year results. J Prosthet Dent 2005;93:28-37.
18. McDowell I, Newell C. Measuring health: A guide to rating scales and questionnaires, ed 2. New York: Oxford University Press, 1996:341-345.
19. Tang L, Lund JP, Tache R, Clokie CM, Feine JS. A within-subject comparison of mandibular long-bar and hybrid implant-supported prostheses:Psychometric evaluation and patient preference. J Dent Res 1997;76:1675-1683.
20. De Grandmont P, Feine JS, Tache R, et al. Within-subject comparisons of implant-supported mandibular prostheses: Psychometric evaluation. J Dent Res 1994;73:1096-1104.
21. Lundqvist S, Haraldson T. Oral function in patients wearing fixed prosthesis on osseointegrated implants in the maxilla: 3-year follow-up study. Scand J Dent Res 1992;100:279-283.
22. Magne P, Belser UC. Rationalization of shape and related stress distribution in posterior teeth: A finite element study using nonlinear contact analysis. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2002;22:425-433.