Changes in contraceptive method mix in developing countries

International Family Planning Perspectives

Volumn 33, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 117-123

  Seiber, Eric E ^a   Bertrand, Jane T ^b   Sullivan, Tara M ^b  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b JOHNS HOPKINS BLOOMBERG SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONTRACEPTIVE USE; DEMOGRAPHIC SURVEY; DEMOGRAPHIC TREND; DEVELOPING WORLD;

ARTICLE; DEVELOPING COUNTRY; FEMALE; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; MALE; REPRODUCTION; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR;

CONTRACEPTION BEHAVIOR; DEVELOPING COUNTRIES; FEMALE; HEALTH SURVEYS; HUMANS; MALE; REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE;

AFRICA; ASIA; ATLANTIC ISLANDS; ATLANTIC OCEAN; CARIBBEAN ISLANDS; EURASIA; LATIN AMERICA; SUB-SAHARAN AFRICA;

EID: 35648959700     PISSN: None     EISSN: 01903187     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1363/3311707     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Population Reference Bureau, Family planning worldwide 2002 data sheet, Washington, DC: Population Reference Bureau, 2002.
2. Lande R and Richey C, Expanding services for injectables, Population Reports, 2006, Series K, No. 6.
3. Sullivan TM et al., Skewed contraceptive method mix: why it happens, why it matters, Journal of Biosocial Science, 2006, 38(4):501-521.
4. Centro Paraguayo de Estudios de Población (CEPEP), Encuesta Nacional de Demografía y Salud Sexualy Reproductiva, 2004, Informe Final, Asunción, Paraguay: CEPEP, 2005.
5. Ross J et al., Contraceptive method choice in developing countries, International Family Planning Perspectives, 2002, 28(1):32-40.
6. Johnson JT and Macke BA, Estimating contraceptive need from trends in method mix in developing countries, International Family Planning Perspectives, 1996, 22(3):92-96.
7. U.S. Bureau of the Census, International Data Base, 2005, , accessed Aug. 17, 2007.
8. Aytekin NT et al., The comparison of reproductive health data in a rural district in Turkey (1981-2001), European Journal of Contraception and Reproductive Health Care, 2002, 7(4):234-237.
9. Magadi M and Curtis S, Trends and determinants of contraceptive method choice in Kenya, Studies in Family Planning, 2003, 34(3):149-159.
10. Donaldson PJ, The elimination of contraceptive acceptor targets and the evolution of population policy in India, Population Studies, 2002, 56(1):97-110.
11. David HP, Incentives, reproductive behavior, and integrated community development in Asia, Studies in Family Planning, 1982, 13(5): 159-173.
12. Bertrand JT et al., Skewed method mix a measure of quality in family planning programs, working paper, Chapel Hill. NC, USA: MEASURE Evaluation Project, Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina, 2000, No. 23.
13. Choe MK and Tsuya NO, Why do Chinese women practice contraception? the case of rural Jilin Province, Studies in Family Planning, 1991, 22(1):39-51.
14. UN Millennium Prcject, Public Choices, Private Decisions: Sexual and Reproductive Health and the Millennium Development Goals, New York: United Nations Development Programme, 2006.
15. World Health Organization, Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS and United Nations Population Fund, Position statement on condoms and HIV prevention, 2004, , accessed June 7, 2006.
16. Sinding S, Does 'CNN' (condoms, needles, negotiation) work better than 'ABC' (abstinence, being faithful and condom use) in attacking the AIDS epidemic? International Family Planning Perspectives, 2005, 31(1):38-40.
17. Maharaj P and Cleland J. Condom use within marital and cohabiting partnerships in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa, Studies in Family Planning, 2004, 35(2):116-124.
18. Salem R and Gardner R, HIV/AIDS survey findings, supplement to Men's surveys: new findings, Population Reports, 2004, Series M, No. 18, , accessed May 22, 2006.
19. Salem R, Men's surveys: new findings, Population Reports, 2004, Series M, No. 18.
20. Zlidar V et al., New survey findings: the reproductive revolution, continues, Population Reports, 2003, Series M, No. 17.
21. Caldwell JC and Caldwell P, Africa: the new family planning frontier, Studies in Family Planning, 2002, 33(1):76-86.
22. Biddlecom A and Fapohunda BM, Covert contraceptive use: prevalence, motivations, and consequences, Studies in Family Planning, 1998, 29(4):360-372.